PIX 2015
dpreview review samples

dpreview review samples

System Account
Joined on Jan 29, 2010

Comments

Total: 79, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On a7RII-RS-DSC09509-ISO_100 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

Digimat: @dpreview guys did you touch the colors in ACR or is out of cam? the examples look much more pleasing than the "regular" yellow/greenish color cast in skin tones of old sonys.

The current ACR profile for this camera is yields a very flat rendering in Adobe Standard, and yes the Sony Camera Standard profile in ACR is exactly as you say: a bit too yellow/greenish for my taste. Therefore, colors are balanced to my taste in ACR.

That said, out-of-camera JPEGs have quite nice color, so I think this is really an ACR thing. We should do a side-by-side conversion comparison!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 7, 2015 at 06:55 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

Digimat: @dpreview guys did you touch the colors in ACR or is out of cam? the examples look much more pleasing than the "regular" yellow/greenish color cast in skin tones of old sonys.

The current ACR profile for this camera is yields a very flat rendering in Adobe Standard, and yes the Sony Camera Standard profile in ACR is exactly as you say: a bit too yellow/greenish for my taste. Therefore, colors are balanced to my taste in ACR.

That said, out-of-camera JPEGs have quite nice color, so I think this is really an ACR thing. We should do a side-by-side conversion comparison!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 7, 2015 at 06:55 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (3 comments in total)
In reply to:

Digimat: @dpreview guys did you touch the colors in ACR or is out of cam? the examples look much more pleasing than the "regular" yellow/greenish color cast in skin tones of old sonys.

The current ACR profile for this camera is yields a very flat rendering in Adobe Standard, and yes the Sony Camera Standard profile in ACR is exactly as you say: a bit too yellow/greenish for my taste. Therefore, colors are balanced to my taste in ACR.

That said, out-of-camera JPEGs have quite nice color, so I think this is really an ACR thing. We should do a side-by-side conversion comparison!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 7, 2015 at 06:55 UTC
On a7RII-RS-DSC08595-ISO_100 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (18 comments in total)
In reply to:

whumber: Just curious, what focus mode was used for this shot? Seems to be significantly front focused.

Really? *significantly*?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 6, 2015 at 23:58 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (19 comments in total)
In reply to:

whumber: Just curious, what focus mode was used for this shot? Seems to be significantly front focused.

Really? *significantly*?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 6, 2015 at 23:58 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (18 comments in total)
In reply to:

whumber: Just curious, what focus mode was used for this shot? Seems to be significantly front focused.

Really? *significantly*?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 6, 2015 at 23:58 UTC
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: Outdoor raws?

Not "raws" processed to jpeg with ACR.

@HowaboutRAW

This is something we're working on and it should be available really soon now (tm)

Direct link | Posted on Jul 30, 2015 at 22:12 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

deep7: Looking at the leaves on the left, it seems Canon has the same problem with this sensor that Sony does - very harsh clipping of highlights. Lens seems nice though.

Sorry about that, the permissions were set wrongly. Try again now. Should be visible.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2015 at 22:19 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

deep7: Looking at the leaves on the left, it seems Canon has the same problem with this sensor that Sony does - very harsh clipping of highlights. Lens seems nice though.

Sorry about that, the permissions were set wrongly. Try again now. Should be visible.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2015 at 22:19 UTC
On bb_ISO125_f5.6_IMG_0089 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

deep7: Looking at the leaves on the left, it seems Canon has the same problem with this sensor that Sony does - very harsh clipping of highlights. Lens seems nice though.

Sorry about that, the permissions were set wrongly. Try again now. Should be visible.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2015 at 22:19 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

deep7: Looking at the leaves on the left, it seems Canon has the same problem with this sensor that Sony does - very harsh clipping of highlights. Lens seems nice though.

Sorry about that, the permissions were set wrongly. Try again now. Should be visible.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2015 at 22:19 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

deep7: Looking at the leaves on the left, it seems Canon has the same problem with this sensor that Sony does - very harsh clipping of highlights. Lens seems nice though.

Sorry about that, the permissions were set wrongly. Try again now. Should be visible.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2015 at 22:19 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

deep7: Looking at the leaves on the left, it seems Canon has the same problem with this sensor that Sony does - very harsh clipping of highlights. Lens seems nice though.

Did you look at the Raw conversion from this image? (previous picture in this gallery).

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2015 at 18:11 UTC
On bb_ISO125_f5.6_IMG_0089 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

deep7: Looking at the leaves on the left, it seems Canon has the same problem with this sensor that Sony does - very harsh clipping of highlights. Lens seems nice though.

Did you look at the Raw conversion from this image? (previous picture in this gallery).

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2015 at 18:11 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

deep7: Looking at the leaves on the left, it seems Canon has the same problem with this sensor that Sony does - very harsh clipping of highlights. Lens seems nice though.

Did you look at the Raw conversion from this image? (previous picture in this gallery).

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2015 at 18:11 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

deep7: Looking at the leaves on the left, it seems Canon has the same problem with this sensor that Sony does - very harsh clipping of highlights. Lens seems nice though.

Did you look at the Raw conversion from this image? (previous picture in this gallery).

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2015 at 18:11 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

deep7: Looking at the leaves on the left, it seems Canon has the same problem with this sensor that Sony does - very harsh clipping of highlights. Lens seems nice though.

Did you look at the Raw conversion from this image? (previous picture in this gallery).

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2015 at 18:11 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

JEROME NOLAS: Nice feet, eh? Why is the sky is blown so much? :(

Because you're looking at a JPEG, which is exposed for the mid tones on a very sunny day.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 21, 2015 at 19:58 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

JEROME NOLAS: Nice feet, eh? Why is the sky is blown so much? :(

Because you're looking at a JPEG, which is exposed for the mid tones on a very sunny day.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 21, 2015 at 19:58 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

JEROME NOLAS: Nice feet, eh? Why is the sky is blown so much? :(

Because you're looking at a JPEG, which is exposed for the mid tones on a very sunny day.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 21, 2015 at 19:58 UTC
Total: 79, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »