dpreview review samples

dpreview review samples

System Account
Joined on Jan 29, 2010

Comments

Total: 67, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
In reply to:

HowaboutRAW: Outdoor raws?

Not "raws" processed to jpeg with ACR.

@HowaboutRAW

This is something we're working on and it should be available really soon now (tm)

Direct link | Posted on Jul 30, 2015 at 22:12 UTC
On bb_ISO125_f5.6_IMG_0089 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

deep7: Looking at the leaves on the left, it seems Canon has the same problem with this sensor that Sony does - very harsh clipping of highlights. Lens seems nice though.

Sorry about that, the permissions were set wrongly. Try again now. Should be visible.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2015 at 22:19 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

deep7: Looking at the leaves on the left, it seems Canon has the same problem with this sensor that Sony does - very harsh clipping of highlights. Lens seems nice though.

Sorry about that, the permissions were set wrongly. Try again now. Should be visible.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2015 at 22:19 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

deep7: Looking at the leaves on the left, it seems Canon has the same problem with this sensor that Sony does - very harsh clipping of highlights. Lens seems nice though.

Sorry about that, the permissions were set wrongly. Try again now. Should be visible.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2015 at 22:19 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

deep7: Looking at the leaves on the left, it seems Canon has the same problem with this sensor that Sony does - very harsh clipping of highlights. Lens seems nice though.

Did you look at the Raw conversion from this image? (previous picture in this gallery).

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2015 at 18:11 UTC
On bb_ISO125_f5.6_IMG_0089 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

deep7: Looking at the leaves on the left, it seems Canon has the same problem with this sensor that Sony does - very harsh clipping of highlights. Lens seems nice though.

Did you look at the Raw conversion from this image? (previous picture in this gallery).

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2015 at 18:11 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

deep7: Looking at the leaves on the left, it seems Canon has the same problem with this sensor that Sony does - very harsh clipping of highlights. Lens seems nice though.

Did you look at the Raw conversion from this image? (previous picture in this gallery).

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2015 at 18:11 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

JEROME NOLAS: Nice feet, eh? Why is the sky is blown so much? :(

Because you're looking at a JPEG, which is exposed for the mid tones on a very sunny day.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 21, 2015 at 19:58 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

JEROME NOLAS: Nice feet, eh? Why is the sky is blown so much? :(

Because you're looking at a JPEG, which is exposed for the mid tones on a very sunny day.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 21, 2015 at 19:58 UTC
On bb_ISO125_f4.5_IMG_0085 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

JEROME NOLAS: Nice feet, eh? Why is the sky is blown so much? :(

Because you're looking at a JPEG, which is exposed for the mid tones on a very sunny day.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 21, 2015 at 19:58 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

JOrtiz: Why, if this picture was taken on full sun, the exposure was 1/200 - F4 at 100 ISO.

At ISO 100, 1/200 the aperture should has been around f/11.

Polarizing filter.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 7, 2015 at 16:32 UTC
On 1C3A5950 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

JOrtiz: Why, if this picture was taken on full sun, the exposure was 1/200 - F4 at 100 ISO.

At ISO 100, 1/200 the aperture should has been around f/11.

Polarizing filter.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 7, 2015 at 16:32 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

bicycle snap shooter: how do you get a 24mm focal length from a 14-42mm (gov = 28-84mm) lens?

The metadata is pulled from the camera, so it isn't taking equivalence in to account. It was taken @ the lens's 24mm position, which means this is a roughly 50mm equiv shot.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 16:01 UTC
On 010_LOWLIGHT_ISO12800 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (2 comments in total)
In reply to:

bicycle snap shooter: how do you get a 24mm focal length from a 14-42mm (gov = 28-84mm) lens?

The metadata is pulled from the camera, so it isn't taking equivalence in to account. It was taken @ the lens's 24mm position, which means this is a roughly 50mm equiv shot.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 16:01 UTC
On P1000319 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (8 comments in total)
In reply to:

Grigou: The focus is on the car's nose, not on the pilot ... is it the AF choice or the photographer's choice ?

Photographer's choice.

Direct link | Posted on May 29, 2015 at 20:01 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (8 comments in total)
In reply to:

Grigou: The focus is on the car's nose, not on the pilot ... is it the AF choice or the photographer's choice ?

Photographer's choice.

Direct link | Posted on May 29, 2015 at 20:01 UTC
On photo in sample gallery (6 comments in total)

For those asking why the high f/stop, I was walking from one area where I could see the track to another and just happened to see this happening on my way. I didn't think to change camera settings, I just lifted the camera up and shot real quick.

Direct link | Posted on May 28, 2015 at 17:09 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply
On P1010415 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (6 comments in total)

For those asking why the high f/stop, I was walking from one area where I could see the track to another and just happened to see this happening on my way. I didn't think to change camera settings, I just lifted the camera up and shot real quick.

Direct link | Posted on May 28, 2015 at 17:09 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply
On photo in sample gallery (5 comments in total)
In reply to:

armandino: Is this a real world example? to me this is badly underexposed. Still headroom for highlights.

I didn't have a live histogram up, but this shot is below clipping. The next shot/series is right when it clips, and the series after that is exposed more for the shadows. I wasn't being very scientific in my exposures here, I just did a quick above and below clipping.

Direct link | Posted on May 20, 2015 at 00:07 UTC
On 017A2829 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (5 comments in total)
In reply to:

armandino: Is this a real world example? to me this is badly underexposed. Still headroom for highlights.

I didn't have a live histogram up, but this shot is below clipping. The next shot/series is right when it clips, and the series after that is exposed more for the shadows. I wasn't being very scientific in my exposures here, I just did a quick above and below clipping.

Direct link | Posted on May 20, 2015 at 00:07 UTC
Total: 67, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »