mumintroll

I think opposite. D7100 has 24Mp and result on high ISO same as 16Mp Pentax. And + 8Mp is quite big advantage. And for me is more important IQ, than body design.

It looks pretty good. For zoom with 1.8 aperture? What you want more? I'm very satisfied with samples.

Wow this look very interesting. Thank you for posting it.

Of course not going back to Raw from jpg. I meant keeping Raw files for future needs.

Why? Because better quality of jpegs than from camera. Also faster work with jpg and browsing thousands pictures and viewing them on monitor is much better and faster in jpg, than in raws....

Why? Because better quality of jpegs from Raw, than from camera. Also faster work with jpg and browsing thousands pictures and viewing them on monitor is much better and faster in jpg, than in...

HowaboutRAW

Actually viewNX2 is superior in quality making jpgs from nikon Raw. I compared output from many others programs and capture NX2 with viewNX2 have best result when you converting raw...

I'm same. I have D200 and I need upgrade. I'm wondering between D5200 and D7100. Thank you for your inputs. Probably I will wait till D7100 goes down in price a little bit.

rb59020
I'm same. I have D200 and I need upgrade. I'm wondering between D5200 and D7100. Thank you for your inputs. Probably I will wait till D7100 goes down in price a little bit.

Agree. I just tried DxO for Raws and comparing with ViewNX 2. Even with ViewNX2 are Raws a lot better in quality then from DxO. I know, DxO has much more options to editing, but quality conversion...

Actually is for 70$. Now. And looks very promising.

Actually is for 70$. Now. And looks very promising.

Don't worry guys I have strong feelings that Adobe will come back with normal licenses, when they realize how stupid step it was. They profit is gonna fell down rapidly.

Maybe this will be slow end for photoshop and new alternatives will arrive. I hope so. Because this is really stupid idea.
Maybe GIMP will shine or others.

Ok guys. Every1 has some valid points. So just do your best.
Also if you have time to tests phone cameras, you should find time to test DPxM properly too. :-)

AND if you cannot use full potential...

E_Nielsen.
Fully agree. Then potential of DP1 was idle.
And agree again. We should see DPxM review with notice of using converter by manufacturer. And everything would be clear a nice.

This same...

E_Nielsen.
Fully agree. The potential of DP1 was idle.
And agree again. We should see DPxM review with notice of using converter by manufacturer. And everything would be clear a nice.

This same...

If you using universal converter for every camera, you will NEVER able to bring independent and real results, how good is camera.
You suppose to use original converter from manufacturer. And set...

So you didn't put Sigma raw's because you cannot use it in your converter? Why you din't use sigma converter? JEEEZUS So you shouldn't use sigma at all. You just killed best advantage of sigma...

Zvonimir. You don't have to have side by side comparison. Just open images in full resolution. There is obviously huge difference in IQ between sigma and ricoh.
And no, I don't have sigma camera....