mumintroll

Actually is for 70$. Now. And looks very promising.

Actually is for 70$. Now. And looks very promising.

Don't worry guys I have strong feelings that Adobe will come back with normal licenses, when they realize how stupid step it was. They profit is gonna fell down rapidly.

Maybe this will be slow end for photoshop and new alternatives will arrive. I hope so. Because this is really stupid idea.
Maybe GIMP will shine or others.

Ok guys. Every1 has some valid points. So just do your best.
Also if you have time to tests phone cameras, you should find time to test DPxM properly too. :-)

AND if you cannot use full potential...

E_Nielsen.
Fully agree. Then potential of DP1 was idle.
And agree again. We should see DPxM review with notice of using converter by manufacturer. And everything would be clear a nice.

This same...

E_Nielsen.
Fully agree. The potential of DP1 was idle.
And agree again. We should see DPxM review with notice of using converter by manufacturer. And everything would be clear a nice.

This same...

If you using universal converter for every camera, you will NEVER able to bring independent and real results, how good is camera.
You suppose to use original converter from manufacturer. And set...

So you didn't put Sigma raw's because you cannot use it in your converter? Why you din't use sigma converter? JEEEZUS So you shouldn't use sigma at all. You just killed best advantage of sigma...

Zvonimir. You don't have to have side by side comparison. Just open images in full resolution. There is obviously huge difference in IQ between sigma and ricoh.
And no, I don't have sigma camera....

I can see clearly from samples, that Sigma DP1 is still a light year ahead in IQ.

Con. Sigma bad on high ISO.
Pro. Sigma has no moire thanks to its' chip.

I can see clearly from samples, that Sigma DP1 is still a light year ahead in IQ.

Con. Sigma bad on high ISO.
Pro. Sigma has no moire thanks to its' chip.

If you want ultimate sharpness go for Sigma Merrill.

What do you think? Why they NEVER compare Sigmas Merrill with other cameras? Because all cameras would be shamed.

Not bad all. I can imagine to have this camera in my pocket. When price will be 700$.

Fuji X-E1 not bad. But personally I think much better IQ have Sigmas DP1,DP2,DP3. I would really like to compare them in Raw.
For studio, where is lot of light, for landscapers are Sigmas the best...

@rusticus

NO WAY. You never will reach with X100 or OM-D so good IQ. Just compare resolution per pixel on those images. Sharpness on sides and corners, etc. Just put 2 pictures beside each other...

@olypan

No I'm just realistically compared pictures. If you are not blind you have to see much better IQ of sigma over RX-1.
And I don't have Sigma. I just see much better IQ on Sigma than RX-1.

This camera NEVER can reach picture quality of Merrill DP2 on basic ISO. NEVER. You don't believe? Check this images and compare with RX1.
Images are in discussion from...

But you can still work with Merrill camera till it writing down the RAW. It going to the buffer. So it's not that bad. You can make couple of Raw pictures till buffer is full. For landscape...

Exactly. Capture NX2 has far more best results for image quality from RAW.