atone2

atone2

Lives in Norway Norway
Joined on Feb 6, 2010

Comments

Total: 8, showing: 1 – 8
In reply to:

BG_CX3_DPREVIEW: Well,

this is what you get after spending 4000 Usd on a full frame and pro lens.

135 mm, f2.8,full frame.

Look similar to Leica Noctilux 50/f0.95 on a M9.

Still,

i love them a lot.

I cannot believe heavy pp was used, maybe some vignetting, but the hardware she uses can generate these pics out of camera.

So indeed strange why she gets coverage at DPR, so many many other great ones on 500px?

Haha...no camera and lens can give results like that without post processing. I really like her photographs, but when having a closer look some of them are processed a little to much for my taste. Nevertheless these beautiful shots have inspired me both to use my SLR more often and putting some effort in PP.

BTW, it is a f 2 lens.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 27, 2014 at 10:23 UTC
In reply to:

atone2: If Fuji gave us an non X-trans option with OVF and EVF then I would be really excited. Meanwhile I´m considering the X-A1 (Bayer) + 14mm for landscapes. I did own the X-E1 but I did not like the output (raws in lightroom). Come on Fuji - I´m ready to use a lot of cash on your system, but I don´t want X-trans sensors....

The three year old Fujifilm X100 with bayer sensor is fantastic :-)

Problem it that I have a huge Lightroom library and I don´t want to mess around with other programs. I want a non X-trans option that works well in Lightroom. I´m pretty sure I´m not alone...

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2014 at 20:21 UTC

If Fuji gave us an non X-trans option with OVF and EVF then I would be really excited. Meanwhile I´m considering the X-A1 (Bayer) + 14mm for landscapes. I did own the X-E1 but I did not like the output (raws in lightroom). Come on Fuji - I´m ready to use a lot of cash on your system, but I don´t want X-trans sensors....

The three year old Fujifilm X100 with bayer sensor is fantastic :-)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 15:53 UTC as 11th comment | 4 replies
On Behind the Shot: Dark Matter article (52 comments in total)

Beautiful shot and processing. I loved every moment at that beach when I was there one week ago:

http://www.dpreview.com/files/t/efcac7803a4d4ad4856e6279be46a764

Direct link | Posted on Jun 7, 2013 at 21:28 UTC as 26th comment
On Fujifilm X100S Real-world Samples article (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

JohnCarolan: Something odd about the tonality on these images, both the ooc jpegs and ACR conversions look particularly 'digital', micro contrast and colour transitions are unsubtle and artificial looking, like the out of camera jpegs from a Sony p & s or something. Seen this on all of the relatively few samples I've found online so far. Hopefully firmware or raw converter updates will improve on this.

Agreed. They look artificial. I suspect NR, even at low ISO.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2013 at 22:47 UTC
On Fujifilm X100S Real-world Samples article (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

atone2: Definately not as good as the original X100. What are you doing Fuji??

Look at her eyes, her face, her hair... horrible rendering...

http://masters.galleries.dpreview.com.s3.amazonaws.com/2474386.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=14Y3MT0G2J4Y72K3ZXR2&Expires=1363645175&Signature=sVPOP1hoTbd7LtPA9lgW7qcZZZ4%3d

What´s going on here? I really don´t like the X-trans approach...

Pretty good high iso shot (but should not be compared with canon and nikon iso 6400 though, because of inflated ISO)

X-trans high iso is ok. Low ISO = underwhelming... I´ve owned the X-E1, and it looks like NR is beeing used also @ low iso. Pretty sick...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2013 at 22:21 UTC
On Fujifilm X100S Real-world Samples article (205 comments in total)
In reply to:

atone2: Definately not as good as the original X100. What are you doing Fuji??

Look at her eyes, her face, her hair... horrible rendering...

http://masters.galleries.dpreview.com.s3.amazonaws.com/2474386.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=14Y3MT0G2J4Y72K3ZXR2&Expires=1363645175&Signature=sVPOP1hoTbd7LtPA9lgW7qcZZZ4%3d

What´s going on here? I really don´t like the X-trans approach...

Yes, i did. But it´s not good anyway.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2013 at 22:15 UTC
On Fujifilm X100S Real-world Samples article (205 comments in total)

Definately not as good as the original X100. What are you doing Fuji??

Look at her eyes, her face, her hair... horrible rendering...

http://masters.galleries.dpreview.com.s3.amazonaws.com/2474386.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=14Y3MT0G2J4Y72K3ZXR2&Expires=1363645175&Signature=sVPOP1hoTbd7LtPA9lgW7qcZZZ4%3d

What´s going on here? I really don´t like the X-trans approach...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2013 at 22:06 UTC as 75th comment | 9 replies
Total: 8, showing: 1 – 8