s mcintosh

Lives in Canada Canada
Joined on Mar 10, 2010

Comments

Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (617 comments in total)
In reply to:

JustDavid: @Jorge, how come you focus all your comments on the Pentax articles? You don't like or use the brand, yet, you've spent three days now 'moderating the user's enthusiasm' (which starts to look a lot more like trolling now). Are the Canon or other announcements not worth your attention? Or do you really have an agenda?

It will also work with my Pentax 1200/8. Sadly, my Nikon bodies won't.

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2016 at 09:04 UTC
On article Hands on with the Pentax 645Z (707 comments in total)
In reply to:

mike kobal: Sorry, but a sensor size of 44x33mm cannot be called medium format by traditional definition.
This is a APMFS-C sized sensor (Advanced Photo Medium Format System type-C)

Ignoring the what is "Small Format" vs. what is "Medium Format" debate, labeling the camera 645 is indicative of the film camera these digitals have replaced and the lenses they use.

Link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 19:23 UTC
On article Hands on with the Pentax 645Z (707 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ian Worthington: Will people please stop moaning that the sensor is not 6x4.5? The sensor is what it is. If you want a larger one go spend the extra money on something else.

For me this makes an interesting alternative to a 5D3 at about twice the price, though it clearly can't share my existing lenses, for the same reason I don't always want to shoot with my 7D: low light iso noise and resolution.

The proof of the pudding is going to be in the lens options and their quality though.

To be fair, Medium Format is officially 4x4 through 6x9, just like Small Format is 110, 35mm etc.....

Link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 19:15 UTC
On article Ricoh announces medium-format Pentax 645Z (161 comments in total)
In reply to:

gsum: This camera isn't medium format - it is MFDX. To describe it as MF is misleading. Looks good though and is almost free of the usual useless 'features' that afflict modern cameras.

MFDX? Where did that come from? DX as in Nikon?.....except they don't have MF. The thing is almost twice the sensor size of FF and it still isn't big enough?

Link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 13:42 UTC
Total: 4, showing: 1 – 4