Hi Barney. I watched to the end but didn't really hear you guys talk about or see any images from your beach walk continuous focus test. How many of the dozens of images were sharp? For me this camera has to be able to track BIF reliably or its a nonstarter. Also, no back button AF is a huge oversight since they're targeting this to Pros/Prosumers. My Canon 600D has this for goodness sake.
vesa1tahti: No time lapse, no bulb = useless
What a stupid statement. Bulb is NOT for beginners. Beginners do not even know where the bulb setting is or what it is for.
Wye Photography: I like the ones with the big triangles in them.
For sure, and look, Francis even directed one of the Egyptians to stand like one too!
Michael Piziak: Nice historic photos.
Umm, the dawn of Egyptology started thousands of years before this.
This is actually worse than that failed piece of poop, Project 1709, or whatever it was called.
Not liking the low frequency Luma noise in some of these. Blue skies in particular look quite blotchy, both in daylight and dusk shots.30_ISO400_ISO400_P1000192 and 13_ISO200_P1000077.
I have an older Panny, and its true for that one also.
Nice idea, but how will the discount work once all the rentals are bought? I assume it will take at least 6-12 rentals before any significant discount is applied.
marc petzold: Photoshop Elements degenerates even more....from the marketing ad: "Stand Out with an Innovative Facebook Page" OMG, that's really a feature what the crowd needs! I'm glad for not using it - and when will Elements be/and allow full 16bit TIF file processing? there enough freeware Alternatives out there. At least after ages (since 2008) the little one, PSE is 64bit. I'd take Paint Shop X7 over PSE anytime, if i wouldn't had Photoshop.
@cgarrard - The horse is out of the barn now. We know there's no going back to boxed software for them. I've all but given up on the idea that there will be one more boxed version of Lightroom.
Marcelobtp: Ok, Fuji is the only one that found its correct niche in my opnion. Smaller, lighter, apsc sized with new sensor tech. smaller and lighter lenses as fast with very high quality, construction and performance.now nikon is going Full Frame. And for what i see, the 36mpx sensor is the limit for the actual lenses. Otus? 10% or less will buy it. As mpx goes up the border resolution diference from the center resolution, of affordable lenses, will rise, and its ugly. 24-25mpx is just enough for the lenses we have now. Lenses are dificult to produce no one wants to wait more 10 years to develop lenses at affordable price to put in our 54 or maybe 100mpx sensor.We want lighter lenses and bodys with the same or higher quality then our FFs now. Very light FF bodys don't balance well with not so light lenses. the proportion is already achieved in FF, now they need to maintain proportion and reduce size. Sony is not doint ic correctly and 4/3 is too small.
Panasonic too. Smaller and lighter, same as Fuji, except they focus more on video features. Both seem to love competing in the superzoom arena, although Panny is winning most battles there lately.
Sabud: This is a rather big lens, will be a nice range of 240-960mm on new 7DM2
No kidding. The poor barn swallow will never stand a chance against that combo. lol
johnvr1: Doesn't 'hands on' mean your hands on and you can tell us how it feels and performs?
They're talking about the pretty German girl.
"So tell me Fräulein, exactly how many inches long is this lens."
FrankS009: As someone who has moved into "enthusiast" photography from point and shoot, I am trying to come to grips with this camera. Actually, I should literally grip one to try a camera that weights more than twice my Panasoniic GX7 - plus a 24-200 lens. This is a design and cultural statement from an different and older world of photography.
In an age when IQ is becoming the same for practical purposes between m4/3rds, ASP-C and FF, I can now go much lighter with the new Panasonic GM5 at one end of the spectrum, or medium format at the other with the 645z. What is this then?
I conclude that a camera like this is a fashion accessory, something to make a statement of a particular kind. It says "big honking camera" to people who are impressed by big cameras in a similar way that big watches are impressive, or pickup trucks or SUVs. What what does it do - significantly - that a GH4 or a Sony A7R cannot do, or the GM5 for that matter? To each his or her own preferences and purposes.
This camera (and the 7D before it) are targeting people who need fast and accurate focusing, fast frame rates and the ability to balance high quality, heavy glass. None of the cameras you mentioned are up for that. It's a big honking camera for a reason. Weaklings need not apply.
Freeman-Jo: Some of you said this will be your next smartphone. i could be wrong but from the pictures shown here, I don't see any lens cap. And we know where we keep our cellphone, in the pants along with the keychains and whatever else that could scratch this big & awesome lens.Just a thought.
Nobody wants an aftermarket cap for this and the lens is not well protected by any means. This design is flawed. It should have a small built-in lens cap that opens and closes when the camera function button is activated. Especially for this NOT inexpensive price.
HomoSapiensWannaBe: $485 for yet another battery grip model -- which uses the same EN-EL15 battery as the D600/610. I doubt there was any need other than greed to change the battery grip from the D600/610. Oh well, in a few months we'll have one or more compatible 3rd party grips for $80 or less.
Even $385 for a hollow piece of screw on plastic is obscene.
tripodfan: The music on the promo video is outstanding.
LOL. Samyang just want to remind us they are not OEM.
Bill Bentley: I don't quite understand the Google connection. Is this a formal arrangement between them and Pics.io? And if yes, why? Google already has Snapseed and the Nik Collection they could develop further if they wanted to go in this direction.
Okay, so then if I understand correctly you are modelling your business plan like Adobe. PS/LR "online" bundle for editing and then upload to Adobe's Revel cloud service for storage. With monthly access fee of course.
I don't quite understand the Google connection. Is this a formal arrangement between them and Pics.io? And if yes, why? Google already has Snapseed and the Nik Collection they could develop further if they wanted to go in this direction.
Bill Bentley: Price = Ridiculous.
But I like that the tech is slowly edging in this direction. Soon enough we will have close to APS-C equivalent quality in a smartphone body for about $300-$350. That will be great.
Of course not this phone Lars, but I'm thinking of maybe 2-3 years from now. It's the same with the phones as it is with television sets.
Price = Ridiculous.
marc petzold: OMG..that's sooo.....exciting....zZzZzZzzzZzzzz....
Sorry... but who enters photo competitions like this anymore? It's become a game where they offer one major prize, a few smaller trinkets and then take ALL the rights to every photo submitted so they can turn around and sell them.
There are still worthwhile competitions out there. This just isn't one of them.