munro harrap: The last time I tried this off-cloud trial of Photoshop it refused to work, saying I had already had it and needed to buy. I shall now attempt again, will let you know if it works... Do hope I dont have to be online all the time I'm working...Dont want my stuff getting to Adobe for free!! Does anyone?
There are things I fail in. I do not understand updates. Surely a competent designer is able to write down what we need globally, all of it, and then simply write all those needs and all those adjustments into Photoshop, or Windows, or Apple OS, or a Nikon, Canon, Pentax or Sony camera? Surely.
I agree there are technological advances in hardware, but in software? So far the only reason , me the old PJ has for even wanting Photoshop over Lightroom is they refuse to allow LR to sharpen at 0.2 pixels, forcing us to use 0.5 at least. Not an update then at all, a commercial tyranny.
munro. I do not like the subscription model any more than you do, however your post has a few flaws.1) It is already well documented that you do NOT need to be online 24/7 in order to use CC. It will periodically ping the Adobe server to make sure your account is up to date though.2) You do not understand updates? The world revolves around updates. Things are always being improved upon. 3) Software updates are probably more prevalent/important than hardware upgrades these days. Anything digital is essentially useless without software. One small example is how Google were able to significantly improve the image quality coming from the Nexus 5 camera through a software upgrade.
Mark Rosen: Just puchased standalone LR6. No haze elimination. Please bring this to LR6!
@rockclimber87 LR6 was just very recently released. You don't think this feature was well in the works before it's release? Is it a big, must have feature? No. Adobe are just using it as a tiny stick to whack those who refuse to adopt their cloud subscription. This type of behavior actually drives me further away as a potential subscriber.
Barend: I want to buy software and install it on my computer. No cloud for me, NSA knows allready enough :-))If LR is not supported anymore I go find an alternative.
@ PKB. Maybe I am mistaken but I have read elsewhere that the new features (such as Dehaze) are NOT available in the newly released perpetual version of LR6.
Bill Bentley: I look to the skies for low light sensor evaluation. For me, it appears ISO1250 is the maximum without needing to employ noise reduction in PP. I can live with that. For me, I'm usually on a tripod and ISO100 in those conditions anyway.
Absolutely! And trail mix too. :-)
Seriously though. To shoot the blue hour, you are usually anywhere from 2-45 seconds, so a tripod is essential.
I look to the skies for low light sensor evaluation. For me, it appears ISO1250 is the maximum without needing to employ noise reduction in PP. I can live with that. For me, I'm usually on a tripod and ISO100 in those conditions anyway.
Tilted Plane: I admire dpreview overall, but doesn't this seem small potatoes compared to the really interesting new lenses out there (some fast wide zooms, some terrific fast primes, etc.)? I mean, you complain that you don't have the resources to get reviews done faster, but now you have time to check out a f/1.8 50mm? Hmmm. Am I alone on this?
@Photomonkey I think the two cat images in the gallery go to show that cat loving FB'ers can actually step their game up with this lens. Look at those eyes. Those eyes! ;-)
Dave Oddie: I'm not into phones that much a photographic tool just using my Nexus 5 when I have forgotten the camera.
The one thing that would tempt me to charge my phone is one with a higher capacity battery. My phone is fine for day to day use when I am in work where I can plug it into the laptop to charge but i'ts not much use if I can't find a power source at some point if I have been using GPS etc.
So whenever I see a phone with a larger battery that grabs my attention. The trouble is they all seen to be phablet sized.
Why can't manufacturers put a top spec phone together that isn't a phablet more often?
It's the battery technology limitations at the moment. Some new fast charging technology lets you get to about 75%+ charge in about 10-15 mins now. But I'm sure that will affect the life of the battery. But if the phone allows for battery removal, and the batteries are not too expensive, then this may be the way of the future. Kind of like the Tesla car battery swapping stations.
Wow. Such big music for a macro solution.
The Squire: I always imagined Richard was more of a pop-to-the-cafe-for-a-latte-on-my-singlespeed sorta guy.
I think DPR need to have Von Wong pay a visit and make this hipster Victorian thing a reality.
T6s looks nice enough. But when, oh when, will Canon finally drop the Rebel name? Just go with 760D worldwide for crying out loud.
AD in KC: OK I really don't get this. It's a camera that sticks to your phone? So your phone is what then, the viewing screen and controls?
The phone is never physically connected. It only acts as remote controller. In image #1 you see two pieces. The back half is the camera attached to the lens.
I have no idea how you would handhold this and then control it with your phone at the same time though. Obviously on a tripod it's easy, but who wants to carry a tripod with this all the time.
Esign: Gloomy, boring, predictable – except for the horse, but this shot is unbalanced and should have been cropped and the horse placed slightly to the right of a vertical center line. Don’t mind the backgrund, this is a horse portrait.
In the horse image the light is falling to camera right. That light and the shadow of the horse adds to the image. Cropping as you suggested would take most of that away and add in more of the shadowed area to camera left. That would be a mistake in my opinion.
DonDown: I was silly to try it - total waste of money.
But the effects could be ok for 12yo girls.
Me too. Camera function was beyond useless.
chriscotec: A solid mirrorless system is probably vital for a manufacturer to stay at the top now. I'm afraid Canon and Nikon have been shuffled from the top to the bottom of the pack. It is difficult for them, as they are both heavily committed to their ageing DSLR systems. The lens systems they have will work on mirrorless bodies but they are not optimally designed for it. The allowance for the mirror depth makes the lenses creates optical challenges that just aren't there for dedicated mirrors lenses. The whole setup is much bigger than it needs to be. The'll work for now though. I work with a large Canon system, built up over many years but I am using my Panasonics on all video and more and more still shoots because of the performance to size ratio.
Canon hasn't released a significant pro camera for ages. If the next isn't a mirrors one, I think they can expect a much bigger sales drop. Nikon too.
@ sushieaterYour comment is a common one, and is frankly elitist and tiring. Thousands of creative images are made each day using cell phone cameras. And millions of crappy ones are made too. It's the same for any style of camera though, DSLR included. They are all just tools. Anybody can put paint on a canvas. Some just know how to do it better than others.
This article speaks exactly to me. I bought Canon 350D back in 2006 and bought the Canon EF 70-300 IS USM as soon as it became available with the thought of moving to FF in the future. I then bought the Canon EF-S 60 macro to complete my kit at the time. When I upgraded to the Canon 650D I bought a used Canon EF-S 10-22 since I was getting into more landscape shooting.
Tomorrow I will be picking up a Canon 6D body (bought last month with rebate). So the only lens I will have to use with it is the 70-300. But I fully expect to be able to sell the 10-22 and 60 for close to what I paid for them and put the money towards the excellent Canon EF 16-35 f4. In the future I plan to add a EF 50 and EF 85 f1.8 as well. This should serve me well for quite a few years I think.
noflashplease: There's nothing wrong with using a full frame coverage telephoto lens on an APS-C body to take advantage of the crop factor. Obviously, the crop factor works against wide angle lenses, but we all knew that at the beginning of the digital era, before there were any full frame DSLRs.
...... and Richard pretty much said exactly that in the article.
"The only lenses that usefully serve the same purpose on both formats tend to be telephotos..."
tt321: There is no discussion about the images taken with walking towards the camera high frame rate AF test? Hopefully it will be discussed in the full review.
I also asked that question and Barney replied that he was impressed with the tracking so far. Maybe so, but I find it puzzling why they included the beach clip but then never showed any images afterwards or really spoke about it.
JanMatthys: Whos is the buzz-kill representing DPreview? is it barney? In the excitement meter that guy is in 3rd place behind "watching paint dry" and "watching grass grow"
Sounds like a "time-lapse" opportunity in the making. ;-)
Bill Bentley: Hi Barney. I watched to the end but didn't really hear you guys talk about or see any images from your beach walk continuous focus test. How many of the dozens of images were sharp? For me this camera has to be able to track BIF reliably or its a nonstarter. Also, no back button AF is a huge oversight since they're targeting this to Pros/Prosumers. My Canon 600D has this for goodness sake.
Okay, good to hear. That "should" be a relatively easy firmware fix. Looking forward to your guys full review. Thanks for the video.
Hi Barney. I watched to the end but didn't really hear you guys talk about or see any images from your beach walk continuous focus test. How many of the dozens of images were sharp? For me this camera has to be able to track BIF reliably or its a nonstarter. Also, no back button AF is a huge oversight since they're targeting this to Pros/Prosumers. My Canon 600D has this for goodness sake.