Blipomatic

Blipomatic

Joined on Jan 11, 2012

Comments

Total: 3, showing: 1 – 3
On Preview:canong1x (1044 comments in total)
In reply to:

mikeyphoto: I've been an enthusiast photographer for about 45 years, using mainly Canon for 25 years, I honestly cant believe the inept, uninformed comments from so many "fellow enthusiasts", I have a 1d mk3, 7d, and g12, each camera excels in its own way, -I am sure I won't be making a comment on this new camera until I actually PICK ONE UP!Frankly it looks great on paper, I dont think Canon are claiming it will solve the worlds problems, so just relax,, enjoy your hobby, no camera is going to make a crap photographer better, look at the photos taken by REAL Photographers with old equipment 30 plus years ago.By the way, 2.8 is fast eneough for 90% of photos, who are you people? Cave dwellers?

Further, I agree about the harshness of some of the opinions stated here for a camera none of us have touched. Further, I am not aware of one reviewer whom has shot with the camera so, I laugh when I read all the Bravado of some of these posts when "we haven't tasted the pudding." Let's what to see how good or bad this design is.

Posted on Jan 11, 2012 at 16:05 UTC
On Preview:canong1x (1044 comments in total)
In reply to:

mikeyphoto: I've been an enthusiast photographer for about 45 years, using mainly Canon for 25 years, I honestly cant believe the inept, uninformed comments from so many "fellow enthusiasts", I have a 1d mk3, 7d, and g12, each camera excels in its own way, -I am sure I won't be making a comment on this new camera until I actually PICK ONE UP!Frankly it looks great on paper, I dont think Canon are claiming it will solve the worlds problems, so just relax,, enjoy your hobby, no camera is going to make a crap photographer better, look at the photos taken by REAL Photographers with old equipment 30 plus years ago.By the way, 2.8 is fast eneough for 90% of photos, who are you people? Cave dwellers?

When a manufacturer produces a camera, they have to balance a number of items AT A TARGETED GIVEN PRICE POINT. In this case, Canon shot for sub 800 dollars which meant it had to trade off dream features vs achievable features AT THE GIVEN PRICE POINT Sure, you can put it all the dream specs in if proce is no object ala the M9 and the X-pro 1. Unfortunately, camera specs sell better than lens specs for most of the camera population. How many "enthusiasts" have you seen which have really crappy glass strapped onto really great cameras. Canon balanced the specs based on what will sell and the notion of planned obsolescence.
Do you actually think Sony could have not launched the NEX 7 when it did the 5. Or Fuji the X-Pro when it did the X-100. Surely the G2X is in the wings at a higher price point. But for 795 dollars, the sensor and chips on board the G1x looks intriguing.

Posted on Jan 11, 2012 at 16:01 UTC
On Preview: Canon PowerShot G1 X large sensor zoom compact article (791 comments in total)
In reply to:

Aleksandr Milewski: A wonderful camera permanently attached to a totally uninteresting lens. 4x zoom is fine, if it were 25-100 equivalent at f2-f2.8. Yes, that would be a large lens, but it would be worth it.

I applaud Canon for a large-sensor compact, and I hope they'll be doing more interesting things with that sensor in the future. But this camera... pass.

I'll be over in the corner drooling over the X-Pro1.

When a manufacturer produces a camera, they have to balance a number of items AT A TARGETED GIVEN PRICE POINT. In this case, Canon shot for sub 800 dollars which meant it had to trade off dream features vs achievable features AT THE GIVEN PRICE POINT Sure, you can put it all the dream specs in if proce is no object ala the M9 and the X-pro 1. Unfortunately, camera specs sell better than lens specs for most of the camera population. How many "enthusiasts" have you seen which have really crappy glass strapped onto really great cameras. Canon balanced the specs based on what will sell and the notion of planned obsolescence.
Do you actually think Sony could have not launched the NEX 7 when it did the 5. Or Fuji the X-Pro when it did the X-100. Surely the G2X is in the wings at a higher price point. But for 795 dollars, the sensor and chips on board the G1x looks intriguing.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 11, 2012 at 15:46 UTC
Total: 3, showing: 1 – 3