TEBnewyork

TEBnewyork

Lives in United States New York, NY, United States
Works as a Investment Managment
Has a website at terrybanet.com
Joined on Nov 5, 2006

Comments

Total: 53, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1197 comments in total)
In reply to:

2eyesee: I've seen multiple sources (PhotoLint and Imaging Resource) state that the screen is NOT a touchscreen. This need clarification and correcting if necessary.

yeah because it is pretty clear that the preview says touch and it gets into detail here but I've seen in other spots where touch isn't listed. Touch is important to me

From the preview:

Spec-wise, the LX100's LCD is typical for an enthusiast compact. It's 3" in size and has 921k dots (640 x 480 pixel resolution). It's also touch-enabled and has the usual features that you'd expect, such as touch focus/shutter, menu navigation, and swiping through images in playback mode.

A feature borrowed from the GX7 and GH4 allows you to select a focus point using the touchscreen while looking through the EVF. You can tap a spot on the LCD on which to focus or 'swipe' to move relative to the currently selected point. It's not quite as impressive as the GH4, where the articulated screen can be folded out for use as a focus-point touchpad, but it's still a well thought-out implementation.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 16, 2014 at 00:34 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1197 comments in total)
In reply to:

princecody: I don't see a P mode? Anybody know whats the deal?

Think about what A in both means. It is telling the camera to pick both the aperture and shutter speed. That's exactly what P mode does.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 16, 2014 at 00:32 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1197 comments in total)
In reply to:

princecody: I don't see a P mode? Anybody know whats the deal?

set shutter and aperture to A and you have P mode

Direct link | Posted on Sep 16, 2014 at 00:19 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1197 comments in total)
In reply to:

zoranT: Please explain the reasoning behind wanting to buy this, provided that 'pocketability' is not the main criterium (which it isn't, as mentioned in the review). Why wouldn t you go for Fujis or Sony NEXes mirrorless etc. that also are not pocketable? Certainly bigger lenses etc., but remember, pocketability is not the criterium. Yet, much bigger sensors and thus better IQ. I simply fail to understand why someone wouldn t prefer bigger sensors including a comparable price range, when size is not the main sales point.

Full external controls that while not totally pocketable still very small.

Aperture ring on lens
Shutter speed dial
Ex. Comp dial
Aspect ratio switch
Focus method switch.

What compares with those control other than the Fuji X-T1 which is a very different camera and not really meant as a comparison?

Oh and for me USB charging is a big plus as one less thing to take on the road and I have a charging dock that that can do phone, iPad, camera etc.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 15:37 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1197 comments in total)
In reply to:

jkoch2: The LX7 has time lapse, built-in ND filter, 120fps 720p video, and currently sells for $260 at Amazon. The sensor is only 1/1.7, but the lens is a fast f/1.4 at wide and f/2.8 at long. It fits in a large pants pocket or any coat pocket.

Is it really worth another $600 to get a m4/3 sensor and 4k? Hard to think up a good lie that will persuade SWMBO.

That mechanical lens cover looks a bit vulnerable in the open mode, as if it could be circumcised accidentally.

Also depends on how much you value the external controls. That's what sealed the deal for me.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 15:11 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1197 comments in total)
In reply to:

Lonnie Janzen: Since i do not worship at The Temple of Low Light . Does anyone know what the MINIMUM aperture is? Without a built in ND You will have to use external ones. Also no word if the lens supports screw-in threads for filters and if so what size.

All that said, I am starting to be REAL happy I didn't pull the trigger on the Sony!

isn't it 1/4000 for mechanical shutter and 1/16,000 for electronic (from the dial on top) and the preview

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 13:40 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1197 comments in total)
In reply to:

rhlpetrus: Only neg so far for me: it's ugly when lens is in use, those "petals" look awful and possibly easy to break and even a hazard as they could hurt someone.

Isn't that lens cap optional?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 13:14 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 First Impressions Review preview (1197 comments in total)

Digilux2/LC1 was one of my favorite ever cameras.
So, when the rumors started flowing about this camera I got excited.
Love the aperture on the lens.
Yeah I wish the lens were a bit longer but I like keeping it small.
Looking forward to getting one....already placed a pre-order.

Had the RX100 for a little while....hated using it.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 12:35 UTC as 310th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

marike6: Another camera choice for "Gear of the Year" based mostly on convenience for walking around?

This new DPR theme of staff exaggerating DSLR size and the amount of effort it takes to shoot a DSLR is getting a bit old.

When you consider all the great cameras released this past year to have an untested, unreviewed camera that is Pentax Q tiny, and really TOO SMALL for even average sized hands is truly puzzling. Add the fact that it has no eye level viewfinder or the possibility to add one, makes this "Best of the Year" choice suspect at best.

If convenience for walking around and size/weight have become the new criterion for judging "the best of the best" cameras on DPR, I'll be inclined to seek out other review sites more focused on actual photography and less focused on ease of use and portability.

Why not wait and see ALL of their picks for the year before ranting about this pick. Did they say this was the best camera? NO. Does it serve some needs very well, YES. Did it break new ground, YES. Did you read what was written and that the writer still has a dslr? Gear of the year doesn't mean that it is the pinnacle of image quality. Would you say an iPad wasn't groundbreaking because a full laptop still had more computing power?

Direct link | Posted on Nov 20, 2013 at 15:02 UTC
On Panasonic DMC-GM1 preview (631 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jogger: Pana should have just gone with a fixed lens compact with the m43 sensor; they could have made the lens faster. Right now, the RX100 is so much better: faster lens, far better video capability, true pocket-ability, option for flash/evf, better interface, better lens, etc, etc. If you are never gonna change lenses (the target market will likely never), this camera doesnt make any sense.

Landscape and street. No flash needed. Doesn't need same battery for me. Doesn't need external flash.

Not sure I understand your AF comments.

I've purposely not bought a second EM5 because I can rent one if I need the same camera as a backup. That's why this is intriguing to me. It CAN serve as a backup but its primary use case is different.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 17, 2013 at 13:50 UTC
On Panasonic DMC-GM1 preview (631 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jogger: Pana should have just gone with a fixed lens compact with the m43 sensor; they could have made the lens faster. Right now, the RX100 is so much better: faster lens, far better video capability, true pocket-ability, option for flash/evf, better interface, better lens, etc, etc. If you are never gonna change lenses (the target market will likely never), this camera doesnt make any sense.

Interesting perspective as I would have no interest in the camera you describe. For me this is tiny with the kit lens or a pancake and serves the great p&S purpose and can be in my bag as the backup to my bigger kit on a bigger trip.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 17, 2013 at 13:33 UTC

Any info on when it will be released?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 17, 2013 at 12:09 UTC as 19th comment

I look forward to the launch!

Thanks for continually adding features and improving the site!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 28, 2012 at 00:21 UTC as 296th comment
On Just Posted: Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH3 preview article (80 comments in total)
In reply to:

Andy Spawn: What is the point to make a M4/3 camera as big as a SLR camera?

The point is you have choices in m4/3 bodies as to what size you want.... but what stays consistent is the size of the lenses and a whole kit is still much smaller than a dslr kit.

Try and put together a kit in m4/3 with the 12-35 and 35-100 along with a few primes and compare that to other fast glass from Canon, Nikon, Sony, etc.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 12:11 UTC
On Just Posted: Fujifilm X-E1 hands-on preview article (277 comments in total)

Great addition of a second body to join my X-pro 1.

Super happy that the external controls are essentially the same. Makes using the two bodies in tandem very appealing.

The external controls on the x-pro1 seem to be in all the "right" spots for me. Really good ergs like that make the camera melt away so you think more about the shot vs. operating the controls.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 6, 2012 at 07:50 UTC as 62nd comment | 1 reply
On Just Posted: Fujifilm X-Pro1 review article (271 comments in total)
In reply to:

keepreal: "There is a school of thought that using software corrections counts as 'bad' design, and that all lenses should be fully optically-corrected for distortion in the traditional fashion. We simply don't agree. This approach was essential when shooting film simply because there was no other option; there's no sensible way of correcting distortion on slide film or when printing a negative. Likewise, SLRs ideally need fully-corrected lenses so that the viewfinder image allows accurate composition (distortion correction inevitably discards parts of the recorded image)."

"Because of this, it makes perfect sense for lens designers to leave a little distortion behind..." I think he meant excessive distortion, not a little.

I imagine the author of this review would be happy with a Ferrari even if he has to put Fuller's Earth in the gearbox.

On second thoughts, maybe he'd insist on it.

If we can get good image quality after corrections AND software based corrections allow lenses to be smaller and more compact and at less expense then I have no issue with the lenses being designed with software corrections as part of the whole package.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 29, 2012 at 00:28 UTC
On Just Posted: Fujifilm X-Pro1 review article (271 comments in total)
In reply to:

marike6: Superb IQ. What's incredible is that at ISO 6400, the X-Pro1 is beating all of the other 3 cameras, including the 5D III. An amazing achievement for an APS-C sized sensor. In a way, I think it deserves Gold just beating the FFs in low-light raw performance.

It's about time we gave kudos to Fuji for innovating on the IQ front, and for making a photographers camera, with a compelling lens roadmap.

@corrander - Using what RAW converter? That is the whole point of the article I linked to. It appears NOT to be a noise reduction issue with LR/ACR but a demosaicing methodology problem. The article goes through this in detail with examples using the DPR studio images.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 28, 2012 at 22:46 UTC
On Just Posted: Fujifilm X-Pro1 review article (271 comments in total)
In reply to:

jenbenn: OF course this camera will be bought by hobbyists for their holiday snapshots because of its nice old-school looks. OF course you can take nice photos with it if conditions are favourable.

But for serious photography? No, sorry! If I do street or travel reportage photos (be it in good or low light) I need a fast (one-shot) AF more than I need low noise. A misfocused image is always unusable while a noisy one is in many cases very usable. In addition, the competitors are not that much noisier, that it would actually matter much in practical use .

Since MF is also very slow, I cant see how this cam can replace my dslr. (Not even talking about the slow shot-to-shot operation and slow wake up from sleep-mode).

What else? For landscape? Yes, maybe, but you dont need high iso there and other cameras are smaller, lighter and cheaper.
Actually I love the concept and I want to replace my 5D, but I have to get my shots, that's no.1 priority (low noise and IQ is a strong second)!!

Interesting - I find that the AF on the Fuji is faster than manual focus on a Leica - manual focus never stopped anyone from saying the Leica's were inept for reportage.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 28, 2012 at 21:00 UTC
On Just Posted: Fujifilm X-Pro1 review article (271 comments in total)
In reply to:

dotyman: I truly wish Fuji would hire an industrial designer/interface designer that understands how people use cameras. While the engineering in this camera is outstanding, the overall user experience is so incomplete that many potential buyers are simply not going to buy it. Especially at such a premium price. And it's SO CLOSE to being the perfect relatively-compact pro camera (which is why it's so disappointing).

The numerous quirks/performance failures of Fuji's X-series cameras is an indication that the company doesn't really care about putting out a fully refined product. Fuji's leadership still thinks like a manufacturer of mass-produced consumer-level products of compromise. What a let-down!

Get a CLUE Fuji!! The X100 was much less than it could have been because of its poor performance and half-a$$ed interface, and now the X-Pro1 is nearly as much of a let-down. And I really wanted to love this camera. It could have been a rock star!

I just completely disagree. The user interface is actually my favorite of any camera right now (except the M9). There are definitely items that can be improved like focus but that is not at all related to how I use the camera.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 28, 2012 at 20:30 UTC
On Just Posted: Fujifilm X-Pro1 review article (271 comments in total)
In reply to:

marike6: Superb IQ. What's incredible is that at ISO 6400, the X-Pro1 is beating all of the other 3 cameras, including the 5D III. An amazing achievement for an APS-C sized sensor. In a way, I think it deserves Gold just beating the FFs in low-light raw performance.

It's about time we gave kudos to Fuji for innovating on the IQ front, and for making a photographers camera, with a compelling lens roadmap.

@corrander - I think if you read up on the RAW converter issues you will find that Fuji isn't doing noise reduction on the RAWs. There are a number of very good articles written about this with comparisons between ACR/Silkypix and others.

http://chromasoft.blogspot.com/2012/06/fuji-x-pro1-lightroom-and-silkypix.html

Direct link | Posted on Jun 28, 2012 at 20:26 UTC
Total: 53, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »