aramgrg

aramgrg

Joined on Nov 19, 2013

Comments

Total: 15, showing: 1 – 15

Seems like fuji is going to supply the rest of its cameras with the same sensor. It reminds the 18mp aps-c canon :)

Direct link | Posted on Sep 10, 2014 at 05:11 UTC as 22nd comment | 5 replies
On Niko announces service advisory for D810 'bright spots' article (378 comments in total)

Oh!
Appears to be Nikon also has customer support. Interesting, good to know after 'dark spots' on D600

Direct link | Posted on Aug 20, 2014 at 18:49 UTC as 17th comment
On DxOMark recommends best lenses for the Nikon D800E article (72 comments in total)
In reply to:

JKP: I have been looking for an affordable WA lens for Canon EOS 6D, and it looks like Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical would be a good deal. At about 250€ (inc VAT) the sharpness/price ratio is excellent, as again shown also with Nikon D800E body by DxO.

The DxO tested it also on 6D, although I am convinced their Canon copy was sub-par, as the same lens on d600 shines.
I have one and I really enjoy it, a great lens. MF is sometimes limiting, but just putting f8 and near inf works as quick setup.

Direct link | Posted on May 22, 2014 at 22:33 UTC
On Pentax K-3 Review preview (489 comments in total)
In reply to:

EdBov: It was 86% minus 3% because of us laughing about DPR.......:-)

A 83% score is unbelievable and they cannot mean this score to be "serious".
The more I believe that Nikon, Olympus and Fuji are paying better than Ricoh (who do not pay for getting good or just even better reviews).

Even the Canon 7D (about 4 years older) has a score of 84%.

Goodbye DPR!. There was once a time I took you serious ................

Canon 7d is quite demanded camera up till now, let's wait 3 more years, and then we'll see what happens with k-3. If the k-3 have been announced in 2010, it should have got more than 7d, I agree. But my point is that time mqtters

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2014 at 20:33 UTC
On Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II real-world gallery article (132 comments in total)

Amazing results. If I am not mistaken, equivalent FF with pixel size should be around 42mp. I want an FF 40 mp with this kind of low light performance.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2014 at 22:26 UTC as 43rd comment | 2 replies
On IMG_0068 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (3 comments in total)

Is this an out of camera jpeg?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2014 at 22:25 UTC as 2nd comment
On Mockups emerge of new Olympus OM-D 'OM-G' article (334 comments in total)

Yeah, and new Canon WTF with 2MP sensor is also released+ Nikon answered it with D400F medium format pocketable camera, which can use human eyes as lens, reading the data from any possible socket that can fit optional P adapter.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 1, 2014 at 17:00 UTC as 194th comment | 1 reply
On I, Igla i konac in the A To Z - Letter I challenge (5 comments in total)

что такая igla? :)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 28, 2014 at 17:34 UTC as 3rd comment
On Nikon D610 Review preview (332 comments in total)

Gold? Come on guys, nothing is changed within a year and so, but your ranking still is gold!
For instance, the same kind of changes has been made from T2i to T3I (even more substantial), but the first received gold, the second one silver, which is logical.
Would you give a gold star another t2i announced this year, say t5? I don't think so(even considering price category change).
So it will be logical to change either d610 to silver, or give no award, saying D610 is a continuation of D600 with fixed bags.
Secondly, your comparing tool at the conclusions page is totally irrelevant. Comparing D600 vs D610 nothing changes substantially, besides the value row. How will you explain me the fact that D610 received gold award, nothing has changed upon D600 to the worse, but it is half the value(even the announced price,maybe by 100$, but they have been fairly similarly priced when announced)?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 14, 2014 at 21:50 UTC as 45th comment | 5 replies
On Stunning 360-degree view from One World Trade Center article (70 comments in total)
In reply to:

aramgrg: With such costs, why haven't they bought(or at least rented) D800E, I think the difference would have been visible!

Yeah, but with the same effort ,D800 would have delivered 1.7 times more resolution, which means more detail.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 11, 2014 at 16:02 UTC
On Stunning 360-degree view from One World Trade Center article (70 comments in total)

With such costs, why haven't they bought(or at least rented) D800E, I think the difference would have been visible!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 10, 2014 at 22:51 UTC as 34th comment | 6 replies

Well, it's too late, I have already bought 6d :)

Direct link | Posted on Feb 26, 2014 at 06:27 UTC as 138th comment | 3 replies
On Meet 'The Archivist' at National Geographic article (41 comments in total)

Wow , the cover music is Armenian duduk!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 22, 2014 at 22:34 UTC as 12th comment

You mean T2i?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 12, 2014 at 19:05 UTC as 12th comment
On Enthusiast interchangeable lens camera 2013 roundup article (281 comments in total)

I am a Canon shooter(also Olympus), but this roundup definitely wins D7100, for best quality available. The only things I do not like are oddly positioned buttons (Nikon users may argue the opposite) and live view mode(objectively). Also, to me , images from Nikon look softer(talking about RAW), otherwise one can find plenty of reasons to go with D7100. To me the 24mp Toshiba sensor is the only one.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 23, 2013 at 19:07 UTC as 66th comment
Total: 15, showing: 1 – 15