rrccad

Impressive showing by the 135L 2.0 against the newly developed for digital Zeiss.

I do believe it's canon's oldest L lens came out in 1996, 17 years ago - when high resolution digital cameras were...

from my understanding;  canon doesn't do any actual noise reduction, but it's simply a black frame offset - this assists with elimination of hot pixels, amp glow,etc that may occur for very long...

+2 on that one as well ... i use this or wireless regardless.

there are some aspects to canon RAW files that are generally most likely work "better" on canon supplied RAW converters. Canon CR2 files store black point offset values for both row and another for...

I'm sure you'll see some on the N side saying support is good .. however I'm with you on this when i see stuff like...

that's not innovation.

about the only innovative camera company is really Sony - who are really thinking outside of the box trying to get market share. adding elements such as SLT's and even NEX's SLT adapter are very...

it would be an entirely different design to account for the registration distance change.

the 24mm IS, 28mm IS, 35mm IS, 50mm 1.8, 40mm pancake, 18-55 EF-S and even really the 55-250 EF-S are at the last time i checked .. pretty small lenses.

allwe know is that it's 18mp.  there are also rumours that the sensor is new. just because it's 18mp doesn't mean it's an existing sensor.  even the 7D and 60D sensors were different.  had to be -...

why? there's so many variants the only thing that stays the same is the 18mp size.  7D is different from 60D which is different than T4i/EOS-M, which is probably different than this one if it uses...

probably one of the lightest DSLR's .. ever - if not the lightest. I don't even think sony makes an SLT that is this lightweight. not sure what you expect for an entry level model .. that is geared...

I wonder if it shares the same hybrid AF as with the EOS-b? the EOS-b rumour mentions a new hybrid AF sensor. could be the reason for the update? dunno .. seems weird there's usually a little more...

you know it's funny.canon admitted and did a recall/fix in oct announced in late sept.. the camera body wasn't really available to june-july.3-4 months really.in canon land that's slow.in nikon...

you're comparing pixel densities from a 12mp sensor to a 36mp and surprised?

diminishing returns on higher Mp cameras, which should come as no surprise.

even more diminishing returns if you don't...

i guess it depends on your definition of very very expensive.  but if it's a mini 1 series - I would expect it to be over 2500.that, btw, as the article went on to say was purportedly one...

actually in some cases the user's systematic IQ can be lowered enough that superior optics simply wont' matter.

my god are you still going on about the 24-85VR variable aperture zoom when compared to constant aperture zooms?beating dead horses are certainly your speciality.

if i recall your thread you sent your 24-105L for completely tuning and recalibration from canon.. so you got a very good 24-105 returned, but a stock 24-70/4.it originally from what i recalled was...

how redundant is your hard drive storage? do you have off site archival backups?to be honest, your hard drive and storage architecture is more of a concern than a card and they usually have more...