MrTed

MrTed

Lives in United States Folsom, CA, United States
Works as a Photographer
Joined on Jan 19, 2011

Comments

Total: 2, showing: 1 – 2
On ACD Systems issues ACDSee Pro 6 and ACDSee 15 article (75 comments in total)
In reply to:

MrTed: Is ACDSee Pro 6 faster than Photo Mechanic in terms of initially launching the application, and then to cull a large number or RAW images?

ACDSee 5 Pro and prior versions have been slow to start for me. I'm running Windows 7, 64-bit with 8 GB RAM.

Any one feel ACDSee Pro 6 is faster than Pro 5 from an image browser perspective?

daniel fritzen - When I shoot Sports, I need to cull 400-500 images quickly to get 3 best shot to press after game. I want speed immediately to find the best images. Then I will load the rest 'keepers' into Lightroom's database for processing into a gallery for sale. So no, I don't want to wait for ACDSee to create a database of thumbnails... I want to quickly see the images immediately when first open the folder. For only 29.95, ACDSee 6 is tempting, but Photo Mechanic seems to be extreme faster than ACDSee 5 and lower at just image browsing. The Free ACDSee is good for browsing, but I can't tag images with that to make it easy to cull.

Per Gothmoth response, seems there is not improvement for browsing speed in ACDSee 6.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 29, 2012 at 04:15 UTC
On ACD Systems issues ACDSee Pro 6 and ACDSee 15 article (75 comments in total)

Is ACDSee Pro 6 faster than Photo Mechanic in terms of initially launching the application, and then to cull a large number or RAW images?

ACDSee 5 Pro and prior versions have been slow to start for me. I'm running Windows 7, 64-bit with 8 GB RAM.

Any one feel ACDSee Pro 6 is faster than Pro 5 from an image browser perspective?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 25, 2012 at 21:25 UTC as 26th comment | 6 replies
Total: 2, showing: 1 – 2