HarrieD7000

HarrieD7000

Lives in Netherlands Utrecht, Netherlands
Works as a Retired technician
Joined on Aug 26, 2011
About me:

Amateur Photographer

Comments

Total: 89, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

We can analyse the anatomy of future cameras to death. We can write what we want, but that won't change what camera manufactures can sell. If in the near future something really revolutionary will happen, don't expect this to come from a established camera manufacturer. They try all kinds of stuff, in small steps, to see where the market is going to. Not as long as they are still selling enough, to survive and can make enough money to develop new cameras and lenses, they go on the way they do for years to come.
The phone market was not changed by Nokia, Motorola or Sony Ericsson but by a firm who had never made a phone before. I still remember every one saying in 2007 an some years to follow " it is no phone and it will be gone soon". How wrong were they?
And what camera we like or buy has less to do what others tell, and more with what we expect from it.
For a short while I have thought of buying a mirrorless, but only for a very short time. Perhaps the next time I buy a camera?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 20, 2015 at 05:17 UTC as 81st comment | 1 reply

I see, some could have done it better, but they don't show their results. This photo is great, and to my knowledge a first in this proportions. Great job, nice result. Creative mind and a tough job.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 6, 2015 at 06:45 UTC as 55th comment | 1 reply

It must be a h..k of a camera, but no matter what focal length, out of reach for me.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 3, 2015 at 05:09 UTC as 13th comment
On WH09_ISO200_f4.0_FX photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (5 comments in total)

Could have been staged, could be photoshop, or just a lucky shot. For me it does not matter, I like it very much.
Coming on the end of the whole series, I like most shots, independent what camera was used. This lens end on my wish list.

Direct link | Posted on May 13, 2015 at 09:10 UTC as 3rd comment
On photo in sample gallery (5 comments in total)

Could have been staged, could be photoshop, or just a lucky shot. For me it does not matter, I like it very much.
Coming on the end of the whole series, I like most shots, independent what camera was used. This lens end on my wish list.

Direct link | Posted on May 13, 2015 at 09:10 UTC as 3rd comment
On Let me try to address that... article (65 comments in total)
In reply to:

Stanny1: Wow, just think how bad a little 4:3 sensor is!

The size if a APS-C sensor is about 40 % of the full frame. The size of a Four thirds is only 26 % compaired to the full frame.
To get a 3 times 2 picture you only use 23 % compaired to the FF.
15 % less Then a APS-C looks not much, but absolute between the APS-C and the Four Thirds camera, you again loose about 40% light.

Direct link | Posted on May 4, 2015 at 08:17 UTC
In reply to:

HarrieD7000: The Transcend cards transfer RAW on my cam, for more than a year now. It is not done with a monster speed, but it works. The jpg files are transfered with more than a gigabyte a second to my iPad. 4 and iPhone.

You are right. I made a mistake it should be 1 mega byte a second. Sorry for that error. And respect you saw it. I think it is to late to change the error now.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 15, 2015 at 05:01 UTC

The Transcend cards transfer RAW on my cam, for more than a year now. It is not done with a monster speed, but it works. The jpg files are transfered with more than a gigabyte a second to my iPad. 4 and iPhone.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 13, 2015 at 06:16 UTC as 13th comment | 2 replies
On Sigma24mmF1.4_samples-04-F1.4 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (3 comments in total)

Great sharpness, good separation from the back ground. Bokeh could be better, but for a 24 mm it is great.
I hope all camera manufactures will be triggered to improve their lenses for a reasonable price, now the bigger sensors are demanding ever sharper glass.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 16:34 UTC as 1st comment
On photo in sample gallery (3 comments in total)

Great sharpness, good separation from the back ground. Bokeh could be better, but for a 24 mm it is great.
I hope all camera manufactures will be triggered to improve their lenses for a reasonable price, now the bigger sensors are demanding ever sharper glass.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 13, 2015 at 16:34 UTC as 1st comment
On Happy Holidays from dpreview article (125 comments in total)

Merry Christmas to DPreview, staff, and all visitors of the site. Keep up the good (photography?) spirits.
Tanks for everything you all.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 26, 2014 at 05:36 UTC as 49th comment
On Nikon D750 Review preview (1933 comments in total)
In reply to:

Frank C.: dumbed down piece of photographic equipment for 2k$+... I don't think so! 1/8000 and 1/250 x-sync was around decades ago, srry today it's fuel injectors, not webers! LOL

My camera has 1/8000 but between the 30K shots I took last years I could not find one I took at that speed. And with my SB-900 I can use my flash up to 1/8000 of a second, but who needs that?

If you don't like a Nikon, please don't show it this way.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 24, 2014 at 21:29 UTC
On D750-DSC_0466-ISO_320.acr photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Great, even with 20 mm just a little depth of field. This is what I like from a FF camera. This is why I more and more start liking the D750.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 6, 2014 at 21:49 UTC as 1st comment
On photo in sample gallery (1 comment in total)

Great, even with 20 mm just a little depth of field. This is what I like from a FF camera. This is why I more and more start liking the D750.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 6, 2014 at 21:49 UTC as 1st comment

I do use he V700 for 5 years now, and I'm pleased about the result. I know I should not expect more than 2000 dpi when scanning negatives, but with SilverFast 8.1 Ai pro, I get very good results. Everyone is pleased when I show what can be made from an old picture or an old negative.
The 800 and 850, do have the same scaner, only the fluorescent light is replaced with LEDs, giving it a faster startup and perhaps a longer life?
For scanning negatives I should have bought a Nikon coolscan, when they were new, because now they cost twice as much. That would have been an investment.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 5, 2014 at 12:46 UTC as 11th comment
On A second glance: two takes on the Leica X article (400 comments in total)

I think it so a good camera, and will last for many years, but as an amateur I can't afford $ 2300 for a APS C camera. I'll use that money to buy a decent FF camera, on wich I can use my lenses. I can't make better pictures with another camera, but I think in detail my pictures will win from this camera.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 7, 2014 at 09:49 UTC as 86th comment
On Nikon D750 First-impressions review preview (1418 comments in total)

@HowaboutRAW.
Thanks, you are right. I wanted to include the D4s, but English is not my first language and with "since" I excluded it.
I'm saving up for a FF Nikon, but I do want to see if the 750 comes close to the 810. Not for detail, but for AF speed an accuracy, I don't think I need 36 mega pixel, but I hope the "newer" or perhaps "improved" or even the "downgraded?" autofocus system Multi-CAM 3500 II is as fast and accurate as in the D810. And works at least as good in lesser light conditions. If so, I could upgrade sooner to FF because the camera is less expensive.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 10, 2014 at 06:11 UTC as 87th comment | 1 reply
On Nikon D750 First-impressions review preview (1418 comments in total)

Is there a chance, DPreview will review and publish more about this camera? Or even any Nikon? I haven't seen any complete review from a Nikon, since the D4s.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 9, 2014 at 07:38 UTC as 89th comment | 1 reply
On 'See Impossible': Canon counts down to... something. article (1656 comments in total)

Now it looks they can copy Apples marketing style, I hope they at least can bring something in Apple quality.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 7, 2014 at 05:16 UTC as 570th comment
In reply to:

RolliPoli: I don't think these should be called "film scanners". They are flat bed scanners on which film can be scanned. Especially from a miniature format like 35mm, sharp, high quality results are best made with a dedicated film scanner. Unfortunately, there aren't many left on the market.

You are right. On my V700 I cant see the difference between scans from the films when I use 2400 dpi or I use more. 3200 dpi will give bigger files, but no extra detail in the result.
For my 6 by 6 negatieve the 2400 dpi is more than enoug, and the results are brilliant.
I have looked for real film scanners, but if you see one, second hand, they ask twice the price they costed new. For an amateur like me these prices are too high.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 28, 2014 at 03:49 UTC
Total: 89, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »