sayed fares

sayed fares

Joined on May 25, 2012

Comments

Total: 7, showing: 1 – 7
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 5D Mark III review article (706 comments in total)
In reply to:

sayed fares: i ' m not fanboy of any manufacturer i have the 2 bodys now in my studio for my employees
my personal camera is Hasselblad
nikon is much more sharper but quality of picture are similar to aps-c sensor canon pictures are very clean and i m talking about image quality at lowest iso ( raw and jpeg )

D800 had a slight green screen color
on video mode the internal system recording is better on canon
canon is a little bit soft from d800 but you can add some perceived sharpness and picture still clean
Noise , moiré , recording time , Audio Control, headphone jack ,ALL-I Intra frame recording mode , aliasing , higher bitrate...advantage of the 5d 3
the d800 advantage is the sharpnes and the clean HDMI output

Direct link | Posted on May 29, 2012 at 05:01 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 5D Mark III review article (706 comments in total)
In reply to:

sayed fares: i ' m not fanboy of any manufacturer i have the 2 bodys now in my studio for my employees
my personal camera is Hasselblad
nikon is much more sharper but quality of picture are similar to aps-c sensor canon pictures are very clean and i m talking about image quality at lowest iso ( raw and jpeg )

at high iso raw in nikon is much more sharper and much more noisier
at high jpeg canon lose a little bit of sharpness ( reducing noise ) but pictures are very clean and color are great long way better from nikon
canon processing jpeg file much more better from nikon it's very easy to see that but pictures loose a little bit of sharpnes
nikon is much better in dynamic range
focus , buffering speed ,tracking ,continuous shooting frames per second , handling , body and desighn ,screen color ,holding in hand.... 5d is much better

Direct link | Posted on May 29, 2012 at 05:00 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 5D Mark III review article (706 comments in total)

i ' m not fanboy of any manufacturer i have the 2 bodys now in my studio for my employees
my personal camera is Hasselblad
nikon is much more sharper but quality of picture are similar to aps-c sensor canon pictures are very clean and i m talking about image quality at lowest iso ( raw and jpeg )

Direct link | Posted on May 29, 2012 at 04:59 UTC as 27th comment | 6 replies
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 5D Mark III review article (706 comments in total)
In reply to:

Halfdan Faber: Until rumors of the D800 started to surface I was seriously considering making the switch from Nikon to Canon. Once the high MP rumors were confirmed, I was still awaiting Canon's response. We now know that Nikon offered up a revolutionary step forward, approaching medium format quality at a surprisingly low price point, whereas Canon answered with a modest lower MP evolution at a higher price. Comparing the detailed ratings raises a number of questions. How on earth DPR is able to conclude that D800 represent a value point of 9, 1 point below average, and only 1 point higher than Canon, stands out in remarkable fashion. Overall DPR has lost significant credibility with this review. What are they going to do when the D600 comes out? Even if it's a fantastic camera, they will have to continue the farce. I suggest that DPR immediately retract the ratings for both cameras and spend some time reviewing their rating criteria.

nikon want create a new camera ( d600 ) to copy the option of the 5d 3 ... like usually
like the d7000 after the release of the 7d

Direct link | Posted on May 28, 2012 at 18:34 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 5D Mark III review article (706 comments in total)

dpreview is removed from My bookmarks...
I Feel like i m inside the nikon manufacturer with canon camera and see her review

Direct link | Posted on May 28, 2012 at 16:47 UTC as 31st comment
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 5D Mark III review article (706 comments in total)
In reply to:

Halfdan Faber: Until rumors of the D800 started to surface I was seriously considering making the switch from Nikon to Canon. Once the high MP rumors were confirmed, I was still awaiting Canon's response. We now know that Nikon offered up a revolutionary step forward, approaching medium format quality at a surprisingly low price point, whereas Canon answered with a modest lower MP evolution at a higher price. Comparing the detailed ratings raises a number of questions. How on earth DPR is able to conclude that D800 represent a value point of 9, 1 point below average, and only 1 point higher than Canon, stands out in remarkable fashion. Overall DPR has lost significant credibility with this review. What are they going to do when the D600 comes out? Even if it's a fantastic camera, they will have to continue the farce. I suggest that DPR immediately retract the ratings for both cameras and spend some time reviewing their rating criteria.

100%

Direct link | Posted on May 28, 2012 at 14:31 UTC
On Just Posted: Canon EOS 5D Mark III review article (706 comments in total)

hi all
i cant believe dpreview give the bad screen of d800 same rating of the 5d3....and more d800 win the movie review hahahhahaha ( Noise , moiré , recording time , Audio Control, headphone jack ,ALL-I Intra frame recording mode , aliasing higher bitrate...advantage of the 5d 3
JPEGs files at high iso (12800) lose 10% of sharpness but reduce 70% of noise...
jpeg in 5d 3 at 12800 is better than d4 and less noise
the build quality is better ,weather sealing 2 time better
autofocus and handling ,
the only advantage of the d800 over 5d3 is the sharpness and the clean HDMI output and Dynamic range
sorry dpreview but your credibility is gone from 4 last years d700 get credit score over 5d mak ii in your website...why ?
the reason is the good movie or the good resolution in d700 ...maybe for LiveView .... sheersssssssssssssssssssssssss

Direct link | Posted on May 25, 2012 at 15:31 UTC as 46th comment | 2 replies
Total: 7, showing: 1 – 7