Kjeld Olesen

4: Keep 18-55 but add EF 85/1.8Chez Wimpy wrote:Unless the GH3 sensor is much improved over the GH2, I an not agree with that. I have the GH2, and it does not smoke anything, not even my old 5D...

I also tried to get some interest going 21 hours ago, but it did not catch on then :-)http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/50544435

Still fun though : film link

Lets not get carried away by small details.I merely wanted to point to another review that seems to show that the 6D will have some rather good image quality in terms of noise and DR...

Well, for me the apparent low noise and high dynamic range parred with the GPS functionality makes it a much more attractive camera than then D600 - additionally that wont fit any of my lenses!But...

With the 6D to replace the "ancient" 5D soon - and a GPS enabled EOS M to replace that Panosonic stuff at the buttom :-) My 30+ years of gear history

Will, it is a matter of personal preferences, but I much prefer working with the DPP interface over LR. But it DO hope that DPP could match the LR noise performance and shadow rendering which is...

http://techrapid.co.uk/general/review-canon-6d/

Sigma 8 mm on EOS 10D Sigma 8 mm on EOS 5D

http://slrgear.com/reviews/showproduct.php/product/1482/cat/30http://slrgear.com/reviews/showproduct.php/product/1395/cat/30

OK, I am in a bit of a sarcastic mood I admit, so perhaps my reasoning is not up to normal standards. However, I never really followed the hype request for wide aperture normal focal length IS...

http://www.juzaphoto.com/article.php?l=en&article=81http://www.juzaphoto.com/article.php?l=en&article=110

Placed 5^th in the challenge.

Congratulations on the first place - and thank you for participating.

An excellent example to show that sharp cornes does not always make the image.

rgds/Kjeld

PS: I do think that you could have...

Just recall that when you see other peoples feather detail they may have applied more sharpening than you have - even another development software. I do assume that you are shooting RAW of...

Somewhat different from my own experienceObviously the 24/1.4 and 35/1.4 are sharper, but when considering the size, weight and cost, I'd say that the 28/1.8 is the best option of the 3 for what...

Without getting emotional, can you please elaborate on your definition of "total crap"?

How about 28/1.8 for some indoor wideangle low light shots?

I wish someone would make something like this for the EOS M - please :-)http://japancamerahunter.com/2012/10/the-nikkor-6mm-f5-6-fisheye-nikkor-aka-the-holy-grail/ I guess chances are slim, but you...

I automatically assumed the f/4.5 version having just read another postHere is a couple of links to follow: To Christian Rollinger's Canon Lens Work Book...