My 15 year old Kodak Brownie does a better job.NOT.So very many of the comments posted here sound like childish brand loyalty with no substance at all. Credibility is lost. You even wonder if many have really performed the side by side comparisons under identical circumstances that they claim they have.
tungsten hour: Why get this over say the LG G4, aside from brand loyalty?
Technology-wise the other makes seem to be leaving Apple in the dust these days.
technocamper: I have a 6 Plus and never take pictures with it unless there's no other choice. I hate the way it burns highlights. But images from the new sensor and this "deep trench" technology are on another level.
Tungsten...you seem to have brand loyalty making judgments assumptions without seeing real world evidence based statements ...
The new iSight camera bumps to 12 megapixels with more focus pixels for (theoretically) faster, more accurate focus. The photodiodes use something Apple calls Deep Trench Isolation Technology to minimize crosstalk; it looks like there are gaps between the wells to keep electrons from leaking into neighboring wells and contaminating the colors. Many posters are clearly having a bout of brand loyalty ...including brand loyalty to brands other than Apple .Many assumptions about actual performance without concrete evidence. Patience to see evidence based comments rather than assumptions based upon very very little.
The Nikon results look great. Very sharp.
I agree. The MK II seems like a much better and perhaps smarter value ...
So they have also changed the name to the Canon RX100 III. :).Now many more of you can tell us how really innovative , groundbreaking, fairly priced and superb this camera is....
Retzius: sony is seriously fearless
nikon and canon could learn something here
Waiting for real reviews...
If the name was changed to the Canon RX100 MK II ...this would be hailed as the ultimate ....innovative...unsurpassed ...fairly priced...
Mr Justice Cocklecarrot: Curious that the Panasonic LF1 is overlooked. It's an LX7 with a longer but slower lens, but with a EVF.And it has the same 1/1.7 sensor.
Currently top of my Christmas list.
LF-1. Wasn't overlooked. See the pocketable comparative test.It was not loved....nor liked...
Impulses: $400 mini vs $230 Nexus 7... Tough sale, I didn't think there'd be a price hike with the Retina display but I guess it makes sense if they're keeping the old one. Selling the old model well into 2014 would be rather odd tho... It's gonna start dragging a-- with updates.
Still reading about repeated reboot issues with the Nexus 7 (2013).After all these months you would think the Nexus 7 bugs would be fixed.....Not an encouraging sign.Is it a software/firmware problem, or a Nexus 7 hardware problem? Either way, Google has not done its job fully correcting this issue even after all this time with a widely known issue......
Every other test of the iPhone 5S has found its IQ significantly better than that of the iPhone 5.....
I think Dpreview has it totally wrong. Excellent sensor. MSRP $399 with kit lens. The A3000 will fly off the shelves no matter what the LCD/EVF resolution. The fact that it has both is an asset!
shadowz: Does the 3N have body / lense based steady shot .?..
"Up to ISO 16000 sensitivity with advanced noise reduction
With a new Exmor™ sensor that features the same adaptive noise reduction technology from Sony’s flagship SLT-A99V, the NEX-3N easily offers a wide range of sensitivity from ISO 100 to ISO 16000."
From the Sony USA website....
They missed mentioning the new to the NEX line, but available in the Sony FF camera the advanced special area linked NR system.
" Unlike the XZ-1, the little XZ-10 allows control over the noise reduction level being applied to JPEGs."
Interesting to note. Also MSRP US is $399. Available March.
Given the size, weight and price of the MX-1, a hot shoe and external EVF option should have been included. This is much larger than the Canon S series and the Sony RX where their is a size reason for not including a hot shoe and an EVF option.No excuse for these omissions on the Pentax MX -1.The smaller and cheaper Olympus ZX 10 lacks both, but it is smaller and cheaper.This Pentax will fall between the cracks. If you are going into the non pocketable grouping, the Fuji X 20 with a hot shoe with a built in EVF that has loads of information shown in the EVF and that had an extremely fast AF and an even larger sensor would be the way to go.The Fuji X 20 even weighs significantly less than the Pentax. If you want pocketable, this camera is too big and heavy and the Canon S and Sony RX are your choices.
NiallM: You buy this if you want ultra - compactness and better IQ than from one of the mass media compacts. It really that simple, and so it will be of interest to a lot of people who aren't going to whinge about lack of vf, zoom etc...it's just about having the camera with you to capture the moment with minimum fuss or inconvenience..my smallest compact is a Canon IXUS 70, which is very dated etc..yet it is so small and that's the lure and charm of it - this Oly is a big step up from it in specs and it will sell..when the price comes down a bit..
Ultra compact it is not.
NIK11: Thanks for the hands-on. I have high hopes of this camera.
The Sony 12mp sensor that we might assume the XZ10 sports has a good pedigree and I'd put money on it that its performance will be close enough to 1/1.7 not to matter(DOF ignored). With a fast lens, useful functionality, easy usability and comfortably pocketable, finally we have a niche camera that's been begging for some years. It's not breakthrough, but it has been missing from the line up of me too superzooms etc.
This looks like a winner, provided Oly prices it competitively.
The question is...does the faster lens (at the mid to longer focal lengths) and newer sensor technology challenge that tried and true correct equation?