Tempting. Curious about tests of course. The 25mm in particular: optical design uses less elements than the 25mm f2 ZF2/ZE, focuses closer and is much lighter. If same or better performance, that would send yet another signal to the DSLR vs mirrorless FF debate. The 85 is not that much lighter than the 85mm f1.4 ZF2 despite the latter's old school build. The OLED idea is ingenious. The overall design is nicely contemporary. These and the Loxia make the Sony a7 range very tempting. But I still do not like the design of that Sony camera range: bland, semi-retro cues, annoying user interface, etc. Probably not for me yet, but keeping an eye on them. That system is now moving fast, and in the right direction.
JacquesBalthazar: That Sony FE range sure has some very attractive features, and most of the recent lenses are clearly best in class. Well done to all involved! That said, I do wish the Sony body designs and user interfaces were not what they are. I just do not like them. Would love that range to have the Fuji xt1 design for example. One day maybe. Part of the pleasure of photography is the interaction with the tools. I think they are getting the lens designs right, the body features are great, but the body design.....
@Zorak That is a big risk indeed! ;-)
That Sony FE range sure has some very attractive features, and most of the recent lenses are clearly best in class. Well done to all involved! That said, I do wish the Sony body designs and user interfaces were not what they are. I just do not like them. Would love that range to have the Fuji xt1 design for example. One day maybe. Part of the pleasure of photography is the interaction with the tools. I think they are getting the lens designs right, the body features are great, but the body design.....
Canon users should rejoice having the option of all that additional real estate: ultimate cropping flexibility.
Some will use that for billboards and advertisement in general, and skip more expensive investments in medium format, just like what happened with the D800. And that is great for young up and coming photographers confronted with the falling tariffs of an extremely competitive market.
Landscape fans will use the 50 MP for ultimate detail, and leverage the camera's anti-vibration features with wonderful Canon and Zeiss lenses.
Great news! All the complaining just seems weird from the distance (I never used Canon DSLRs). We are all so spoiled!
You make some fair points and ask some good questions. Just one correction: you forgot the 18.5mm f1.8 lens (equiv around 55mm FX), which is a gem in itself. For the rest, it is a matter of opinion indeed. For very many applications the 1" sensor size makes perfect sense. The Nikon 1 users are usually very enthusiastic about the reactivity and speed of the system, the video features and the quality of the stills output. I know I love the V1 and keep going back to it after having failed to enjoy the more trendy but sluggish mirrorless offers (Nex 7, Fuji xe1). The sarcastic comments that pop up every time the Nikon 1 is mentioned do no good to anyone and are usually completely off the mark. Nikon has produced a great system, with many highlights, and quite a few odd gaps, baffling user interface details and bizarre marketing choices. I will buy the V3, if the 18MP output is as good as the V1's 10MP. And the new long zoom. And the 32mm f1.2. And keep my DSLR outfit.
Beautiful machine! This is indeed a really impressive technological showcase of a tool.
Nice one Fuji! Hope lag is now gone. Very tempting....
JacquesBalthazar: The element that was cloned out was an important piece of information. It was telling the viewer that there were more than one reporter at that precise location. That brings insight and questions about the "PR" logistics around the photographed incident : how did the reporters get there? Who brought them there? Why? Did the gun carrying person in the picture know he was moving in front of reporters? Did he place himself in that way at that location because he knew the press was there?
By cloning out the camera, the photographer wanted to avoid such questions being raised by the viewer. He wanted to suggest exclusive intimacy between him, the fighter and the war surrounding the scene. That is not a minor act, and Mr Contreras knows that full well. AP did the right thing.
On the other hand, If I was running a news agency, I would probably hire the talented Mr Contreras now, as he has certainly realised the risks of doctoring such images and wil never be tempted again.
@LeitzKameraAktion: you are right. It did not cross my mind that the videocam might have been his own, simply lying there. Another proof that a picture does not necessarily tell the whole story, cloning or no cloning.... Does not change the fundamental issue though.
The element that was cloned out was an important piece of information. It was telling the viewer that there were more than one reporter at that precise location. That brings insight and questions about the "PR" logistics around the photographed incident : how did the reporters get there? Who brought them there? Why? Did the gun carrying person in the picture know he was moving in front of reporters? Did he place himself in that way at that location because he knew the press was there?
marike6: Locking exposure dials a la the Nikon Df? Any amount of money that DPR loves this camera and the dials from day one. :-)
Part of what makes the X cameras at least interesting is the rangefinder design, the whole poor man's Leica thing.
What is the point copying a DSLR body styling? It's has no bright Pentaprism so why the pseudo pentaprism housing?
This is a head scratcher move from Fujifilm that is for sure. No FF, just an X camera dressed up as a DSLR. Has anybody asked why?
"Locking exposure dials a la the Nikon Df?": unfortunately no lock on that dial it seems. On XE1/X100, EC dial is way too sensitive to unintentional manipulation (rubbing against clothing while carrying or just by holding camera in hand). Kept ruining opportunities. With Df, EC only happens when you want it to. The dial locks are features I truly love with the Df. For the rest, this new X sure looks nice. With the new 58mm f1.2 and Fuji's xtrans processing, this will be a killer portrait machine !
It is a specialty lens. While 58mm is close to the 50mm "standard", the small reduction in angle of view and additional compression make it a very suitable indoor "action" portrait focal length. I see uses for this for low light photography in bars, at parties, weddings, etc. Sure the 50mm can do it as well but it is not exactly the same. The 60mm macro can do it from f2.8. The 85mm requires more distance, more room to back off. The 85mm makes it harder to get 2 people together in focus.
It is also a seductive specialty lens in its design, prioritising for a set of goals beyond "sharpness". The obsession for ultimate sharpness, outside of scientific applications and some landscape styles, is mainly self gratifying pixel peeping fun. Some of us prefer "mood" or "atmosphere" to "lines per millimetre".
I'd understand the hate if this lens replaced the standard 50mm f1.4, but it does not. As a specialty lens, the price might be right for the target users.
Wow! This is a gorgeous picture indeed!
AF is indeed not the strongest Df feature. I have been using mine for more than 2 weeks now, and, while I genuinely love the overall experience, I do find the Df's AF a bit less sure footed than the D800's. Specifically in very low light situations where this camera otherwise excels. In those situations, it hunts a bit more and sometimes does not lock on subjects that I feel the D800 would. Typical example is focusing on model eye at portrait distance in dark bar or dark street. That comes marginally easier with the D800. As per light sensitivity data for the AF module in spec sheet.
For the rest, I do find it very good at manual focusing. Not sure if there is any black magic going on in the viewfinder or if it just a placebo effect, but it works for me with MF lenses, including with the f1.2 50mm. Success rate around 90% wide open when careful.
A great companion for nostalgic old farts like me, or for the younger folks who crave for a more "analogue" interaction with the world.
CFynn: Wonder how this compares to the Voigtlander Nokton 58mm f/1.4?That lens is the same focal length and speed, but available at less than one third the price. Has nice bokeh too.
Nokton 58..... I am curious as well. That one is a jewel....
DaveE1: I like the design of old cameras. I can see why some people collect them.
But a modern camera mocked up to look retro? Personally, I don't quite get it. Maybe it is the modern screen on the back mixed with the vintage style that makes me wince.
This one looks particularly odd to my eyes; almost looks like a digital camera in a underwater housing from some angles. It's not ugly, and Nikon are perfectly right to test it in the marketplace.
Then again camera manufacturers are catering for people who run their high resolution photos through filters to make them look like they were taken with a film camera with faulty light sealing.
"Then again camera manufacturers are catering for people who run their high resolution photos through filters to make them look like they were taken with a film camera with faulty light sealing."
Uuno Turhapuro: I am surprised that the fact that iso and exposure compensation dials are on the left side of the camera has not been discussed here before?
I am using my left hand to support the camera and setting focal length, focus and maybe aperture ring. So if I am using manual mode and want to use fixed aperture and shutter speed and setting the correct exposure via ISO I have to move my left hand from its correct position. Same if I am using aperture or shutter priority I have to move my left hand again to change exposure compensation. So how is this exactly better than using command dials with and without simultaneous button press with my right hand to set all these important setting without moving my left hand?
@T3: absolutely right!
That said, I have been re-using my FM3A since the rumours started on the Df, and rediscovered it gave me the greatest pleasure to operate. A pleasure I have never found when using the D800, even if the latter is a very high performer, fast, accurate, responsive. The D800 is a tool so perfectly efficient, that it spoils my fun (I am not making a living out of pics). Go figure.
I also use my old M6 every once in a while, again with the same great pleasure. The digital Ms try hard to replicate that experience, but it is not the same: they are clunkier, heavier, slower, noisier. I tried to like them, but just not as much fun (and not really that good).
Tried the Fujis as well, and while they look good, they are just....clunky (cannot find a better word), and the command and control dials and buttons feel cheap and fragile. No fun for me either.
Maybe the Df then. Nothing to do with ergonomy. More to do with (the hope of) pleasure and fun. Looks solid and fast.
dprmja: No split screen for manual focusing!!
My Nikon FM, thanks to split screen, was way more comfortable to adjust focus than any DSLR I had.
I was waiting for a Digital FM, and ready to pay the price for that.But this is one of the key features that is missing here!
I don't know, like an iPad without multitouch!This makes absolutely no sense.
No ground glass, no optical focusing aid. Cannot use this reliably with fast manual focus lenses. Makes no sense to pitch AI and pre-AI metering capability, and deny the option of a good focusing screen. Never mind the "hybrid" viewfinder option that was rumoured a month ago, and that could have made this camera an absolute winner.... Disappointed. It is pretty though.
No ground glass, no split screen focusing aid, this means the Df is unfortunately as useless for the fast old or new manual focus lenses as the other Nikon DSLRs. What a shame!!!!
Fair review. I am one the crazy/lucky guys who ended up with both A and GR. always dreamt of an APS GR, but when the A came out I thought that was it, and had no idea the Ricoh was round the corner. So I have learned to use and love the A before splurging for the GR. in retrospect I was all wrong of course, and having both feels silly. All this to say is that, after time with both, I unexpectedly prefer the A. Despite the better ergonomics and UI of the Ricoh. Not sure why I do. It has to do with build and finish I think. The A is very well put together in all aspects. The materials used feel better, and the dials and buttons have great tactile feedback. Better for me than GR. and I just love the output and IQ. Finally, I like the "made in Japan" bit. It is noteworthy in today's age and a good thing for many fundamental reasons....
(Comment deleted by author)