Joined on Mar 26, 2012


Total: 11, showing: 1 – 11
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II Review (1308 comments in total)
In reply to:

JohnEwing: "No touch screen" is actually a point in its favour.

the 'one hit zoom to 100% of your focus point preview' button is a lot faster than touching and pinching.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 17, 2014 at 02:04 UTC

I feel Slater has been wronged. Wasn't it Slaters intention to have the monkey take some pictures. Take Slater out of the picture = no monkey selfie = no pictures for Wiki to exploit.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 23, 2014 at 05:14 UTC as 33rd comment | 4 replies
On Preview:canon-eos-70d (1311 comments in total)


Posted on Aug 21, 2013 at 05:32 UTC as 210th comment | 1 reply


Now even more excited for 7D2

Direct link | Posted on Jul 2, 2013 at 06:30 UTC as 62nd comment
In reply to:

chlamchowder: The Nikon AF-S 200-400/4 VR II is $6750, and the TC-14E is $500. Together, they would cost $7520.
So, the question is, is the convenience of having the teleconverter built in worth $4480?

where as the Nikon add-on teleconverter will degrade the image a bit due to it being an afterthought piece, there is no image degradation in Canon's built-in version. It was engineered to operate with it's teleconverter without compromise.

It's a specialty lens, for the time when a photographer is shooting in a snowstorm, sandstorm, hostile environment, etc and attaching the teleconverter is out of the question.

But i do agree, it's too pricey.

Direct link | Posted on May 14, 2013 at 05:00 UTC
On photo ISO-102400-IMG_0066 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (4 comments in total)

wow, that's very nice for that high of an ISO

Direct link | Posted on Nov 21, 2012 at 13:20 UTC as 1st comment
On a photo in the Canon EOS 6D Beta preview samples gallery sample gallery (4 comments in total)

wow, that's very nice for that high of an ISO

Direct link | Posted on Nov 21, 2012 at 13:20 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

Mssimo: Added the Canon.

Nikon 35mm F1.4G vs Canon 35mm f1.4L vs Sigma 35mm F1.4

Elements 10 vs 11 vs 13
Groups 7 vs 9 vs 11
Filter 67mm vs 72mm vs 77mm
Weight 600g vs 580g vs 665g
Special Elements (one aspherical) vs (1 aspherical) vs(1 FLD and 4 SLD elements)
Price $1620 vs $1329 vs $899 (current amazon price)

Canon stops down to F22, sigma and nikon go to F16.
Canon has 8 Blades, Sigma and nikon have 9

Canon has red ring, nikon has gold ring, sigma has no rings.

Sigma has a 67mm filter thread

Direct link | Posted on Nov 10, 2012 at 18:43 UTC
On article Photokina 2012: Sigma Stand Report (40 comments in total)
In reply to:

samfan: So does the 35/1.4 replace the 30/1.4? Guess I should get the old version quickly then. Sigma has a weird habit of upgrading great oddball lenses to crappier mainstream versions (usually from EX to OS).

The new 35 1.4 is made for full frame sensors. 30 1.4 is crop only.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2012 at 22:11 UTC

not sure what all the complaint is about, but given the price point to sensor size, lens compatibility, accessories, image quality, other camera comes close. And all this at a small package.

I myself probably won't buy it (my 5d3 does me wonders) but i can see this heading in a potentially great direction.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 25, 2012 at 04:44 UTC as 30th comment | 8 replies

these are decent samples but don't do any justice to the 5D3. my experience with it has been a great deal of joy. I still can't believe how clean high iso images look.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2012 at 02:23 UTC as 20th comment | 1 reply
Total: 11, showing: 1 – 11