Nice photo, but terrible image quality ... It shows how bad are compact cameras under a bit complicated conditions ..
neatnclean: I don't see a real advantage in using white OLEDs with colour filters instead of RGB-colored OLEDs. White OLEDs will inevitably also show some variation in their light emission/spectrum, just the same as RGB-coloured OLEDs. The colour filters themselves are just an additional element in the light path, gobbling up some of the light emitted by the OLEDs = less brightness, less brilliance. Even more importantly: why are the pixels *rectangular* with 9.9x3.3um? In a high-res OVF I definitely expect to get equal resolution vertically and horizontally! So why not 3.3x3.3um pixels?And the resolution itself, while better than most current, utterly disappointing low-res EVFs is nothing to really brag either. 2.4M subpixels translats into a measly XGA resolution of 1024x768 real pixels = not even "Full HD" resolution. 10 years ago that would have been quite spectacular, but certainly not in 2011. All in all, this is still at least one product generation away from "good enough for me" EVFs.
> why are the pixels *rectangular* with 9.9x3.3um?
because there are three (R-G-B) beside ?
overall nice photos, but here it seems like a bit blooming on white handrail ?
SKolijn: Title should probably read SX 150 IS.....
the same camera as SX130 with 14Mpx (not better as 12Mx on so small chip)