rinsephotographic

That it would be awesome if it did...but it doesn't, unfortunately. m4/3 is a 2X crop factor and since the focal length of the 12-24mm is 12-24mm no matter which camera it is on, it would be a...

i'm going with omar. i considered hector, as it has a nice ring. me: i'm gonna go spend some time with hector.wife: you're always with hector. i'm feeling neglected. but i think that omar captures...

..because every single lens nikon makes will show MORE resolution on the d800/e. every one. it's how the whole game works. to get the last little tiny bit of detail out of the sensor you need the...

well they failed, zombie master. i'm fast at work creating an olympon or a nikympus cyborg that will destroy all with unending and arcane menu complexity...

most excellent. you have won me over...touche.

teo, you're like a child who wanders into a movie and wants to know...your obvious lack of even the most basic studio knowledge coupled with your bizarre insistence that you're right is almost...

no, not really. i have no interest in providing a raw photo. my interest was in taking you to task on your (ridiculous) assertion that one should just shoot jpegs in the studio. besides, imaging...

it doesn't seem like you've spent much time in a pro studio. the reason i'm currently in this forum is because one of the photographers i shared a studio with recently was shooting with an om-d and...

is that a joke? as a professional studio photographer i can tell you that i don't know a single studio pro who doesn't shoot in RAW. honestly, your assertion that jpegs are just fine is so wrong...

ok sport. wrong.wrong again.still wrong. honestly man, i'd argue with you if it wasn't so obvious that you've never done much commercial studio work. you don't even know why what you're saying is...

...and should only comment on aspects of photography with which you are familiar. f/8 - f/11 is very typical for professional studio work with big strobes. but you are right on one thing...a studio...

...is laughable. c'mon.

complaining about colour in digital is asinine. complaining about colours in AWB under mixed lighting even more so. my word.

i have noticed no difference in the speed of my computer. that said, d800 files are not overly large compared to some of the files i routinely work with (scans and MF). SSDs and lots of RAM, if you...

...you don't need either lens. the FOV and the subsequent 'look' each lens produces is so radically different that they shouldn't ever be considered as equal or equivalent. lenses  are like...

you don't. your shutter speed is irrelevant because the effective exposure time is the flash duration. for example, water drop photos are actually done at quite slow shutter speeds in rather dark...

agreed. i am having a hard time imagining where my photography would be limited by a 1/4000 shutter speed. in fact, i don't think i've ever looked at that specification or been aware of the top...

welcome to slr photography...you have just discovered vignetting! as you have just found out, it can be a pain and, as such, is one of the standard metrics by which lenses are judged...most lens...

solid and interesting advice. glad you took the time to post.

i like the skies...they look how vancouver feels. sun is tenuous; rain omnipresent. that said, i'm a bit like ansel adams: not one for literal interpretations, too little room left for art.