Summit_pg

Summit_pg

Lives in Canada British Columbia, Canada
Joined on Nov 15, 2006

Comments

Total: 21, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »

GoPro > that thing ;)

Direct link | Posted on Aug 15, 2014 at 01:38 UTC as 10th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Summit_pg: Nice to hear they're trying to work with some of the Fuji issues in ACR. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE do something to address the smearing of fine details (foliage). I love Lightroom, but I and many other Fuji users currently have to process landscapes in other programs (NoiseNinja or Iridient) because ACR's results are just...bad.

Grr, can't edit. I meant PhotoNinja, not NoiseNinja. Too many Ninja's, too few Adobe products that can process Fuji files.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 4, 2014 at 04:04 UTC
In reply to:

Summit_pg: Nice to hear they're trying to work with some of the Fuji issues in ACR. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE do something to address the smearing of fine details (foliage). I love Lightroom, but I and many other Fuji users currently have to process landscapes in other programs (NoiseNinja or Iridient) because ACR's results are just...bad.

From the X-T1. Latest version of Lightroom and ACR. To it's credit, sometimes Lightroom produces OK results with the landscapes. However, the only way for Fuji X-Trans shoots to maximize image quality for their cameras (mainly landscape shooting with foliage) is for them to process images via PhotoNinja or Iridient. Either of these programs produce noticeably better results when compared to Lightroom.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 4, 2014 at 00:38 UTC

Nice to hear they're trying to work with some of the Fuji issues in ACR. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE do something to address the smearing of fine details (foliage). I love Lightroom, but I and many other Fuji users currently have to process landscapes in other programs (NoiseNinja or Iridient) because ACR's results are just...bad.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 3, 2014 at 20:20 UTC as 17th comment | 7 replies
On Nikon AF-S Nikkor 58mm f/1.4G review preview (412 comments in total)

not-a-noct.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 30, 2013 at 18:23 UTC as 167th comment
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1396 comments in total)

This will look great with my skinny jeans!

Direct link | Posted on Nov 2, 2013 at 05:19 UTC as 245th comment | 1 reply

Classy.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2013 at 20:27 UTC as 61st comment

Pretty rad photos. Nicely done!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 13, 2013 at 04:29 UTC as 63rd comment

Insert "I boiled my D600 to clean the dust" comment here.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 19, 2013 at 03:17 UTC as 58th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Summit_pg: Hopefully this means that Nikon can finally kill off the ignorant '1' lineup of cameras.

Sorry, I should have been clearer. I was referring to the good sign that Nikon is squeezing in a DX sensor into smaller cameras. You are totally right about there being different market segments. I just can't help but feel that the '1' series is a mistake like the good old Pronea line.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2013 at 04:38 UTC

Hopefully this means that Nikon can finally kill off the ignorant '1' lineup of cameras.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 5, 2013 at 04:27 UTC as 56th comment | 4 replies
On Fujifilm firmware attempts to fix X10 white discs article (264 comments in total)
In reply to:

Summit_pg: I'm sooooo happy I sold my X10. Well over a month ago users already knew that the update would not be able to fix the issue. People need to realize that Fuji DOES NOT CARE about this camera or those who bought it. Sell yours while you can still get a decent return and buy a camera from a better company. I'll never buy another Fuji again.

That was exactly my issue. I tried to return it but was outside of he return period. I tried to get it fixed under warranty and was told that the camera is fine and within spec. So did I sell a broken camera to someone else? No! I re-sold the exact same thing that Fuji sold me!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2012 at 20:41 UTC
On Fujifilm firmware attempts to fix X10 white discs article (264 comments in total)

I'm sooooo happy I sold my X10. Well over a month ago users already knew that the update would not be able to fix the issue. People need to realize that Fuji DOES NOT CARE about this camera or those who bought it. Sell yours while you can still get a decent return and buy a camera from a better company. I'll never buy another Fuji again.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 10, 2012 at 02:47 UTC as 69th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

Almeida: "The firmware update [for X10], that addresses the hard-edged white discs or orbs generated when highlight regions clip, will reduce but not completely remove the effect."

That doesn't bode well...

I am pretty close to selling mine too. I'll wait for the new firmware to come out and give it a shot though. Even if the firmware is 'ok', I think I'm still going to terminate my ownership of the X10 and stop any further Fuji purchases. Its just not worth dealing with Fuji's HORRIBLE quality control.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 13, 2012 at 02:37 UTC
In reply to:

Summit_pg: Too bad this roadmap does not say when/if Fuji will fix the other broken cameras that they have on the market.

The new Fuji X10 and the Fuji XS1 have an issue with the sensor. It turns highlights in an image into completely white burned out orbs/ovals. Does the same in RAW. No way to save the image if it happens, no way to prevent it. Only thing that seems to slow it down is shooting at high ISOs. Fuji says its 'normal'.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 11, 2012 at 15:25 UTC

Too bad this roadmap does not say when/if Fuji will fix the other broken cameras that they have on the market.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 10, 2012 at 23:44 UTC as 72nd comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Summit_pg: This is cool and all, but honestly, why not fix the current cameras? Fuji has the X10 and the XS1 on the market right now and they are crippled by the white dot syndrome. Fuji has not done anything to fix it yet...

I will never buy another "new" Fuji camera. Apparently they do their quality control testing on actual consumers. Buyer beware.

Fuji needs to spend less time making things look pretty and more time making things work properly.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 10, 2012 at 03:21 UTC

This is cool and all, but honestly, why not fix the current cameras? Fuji has the X10 and the XS1 on the market right now and they are crippled by the white dot syndrome. Fuji has not done anything to fix it yet...

I will never buy another "new" Fuji camera. Apparently they do their quality control testing on actual consumers. Buyer beware.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 10, 2012 at 02:23 UTC as 65th comment | 5 replies

Sadly, I'm an X10 owner. I will never purchase another 'new' Fuji camera ever again.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 8, 2012 at 03:49 UTC as 8th comment

Queue the ORBs...it shares the same sensor, and same issues, as the Fuji X10.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 5, 2012 at 05:05 UTC as 20th comment | 1 reply
Total: 21, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »