Kurt_K

Kurt_K

Lives in Canada Saskatchewan, Canada
Joined on Nov 11, 2010

Comments

Total: 72, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On Nikon D7200 Review preview (526 comments in total)
In reply to:

JakeB: When are we going to see a Nikon D400, the true replacement to my D300s???

LOL.

Sorry. Wanted to post that before someone who was serious made that tired post.

What does Nikon have to compete with the NX1? Umm, how about lenses?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 3, 2015 at 23:11 UTC
On Readers' Showcase: Nicolas Alexander Otto article (35 comments in total)

Some lovely work. I especially like #9.

Direct link | Posted on May 31, 2015 at 15:42 UTC as 21st comment | 1 reply

I thought it was kind of humorous, though not nearly as humorous as this comment section. Why is everyone so bloody serious? C'mon, people, it's just a spoof ad.

Direct link | Posted on May 21, 2015 at 00:34 UTC as 94th comment
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 offers 4K video article (128 comments in total)

Looks pretty good to me. I'd love to know what the buffer size is.

Direct link | Posted on May 18, 2015 at 18:54 UTC as 19th comment
On Big Zoom: Nikon Coolpix P900 real-world samples article (154 comments in total)
In reply to:

forpetessake: When will DPR stop publishing misleading numbers? It's NOT "a mind-blowing F2.8-6.5 24-2000mm equivalent zoom".

You either provide conversion for both f-stop and focal length, which are mind-blowing F14.6-33.8 24-2000mm FF equivalent. Or provide the physical parameters, which are F2.8-6.5 4.6-385mm.

It's hard to believe DPR continues making honest mistakes -- writing a F14.6-33.8 4.6-385mm would have been an honest mistake, and I've never seen that.

I swear some people live for comment section equivalency debates. Give it a rest already.

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2015 at 05:05 UTC
On Readers' Showcase: Janne Voutilainen article (36 comments in total)

#8 is particularly beautiful.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2015 at 16:11 UTC as 29th comment
In reply to:

rallyfan: Why harass the three elderly women in Spain?

Is it the end of the world that a photographer took a picture of three old women who obviously didn't want to be photographed? Certainly not, but that doesn't change the fact that a considerate person would have lowered his camera instead of pressing the shutter button.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 13, 2015 at 01:14 UTC
On Nikon 1 J5 offers 20.8MP BSI sensor and revamped look article (152 comments in total)

No bracketing option at all? Seriously?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 3, 2015 at 06:16 UTC as 10th comment
On Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Review preview (814 comments in total)

Why isn't there a performance page in this review? I'm having trouble finding info on buffer depth, specifically.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 28, 2015 at 00:33 UTC as 49th comment
On Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Review preview (814 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kurt_K: I see that the regular studio comparison was done with the Oly 45mm and that the high-res comparison was with the Panny 42.5mm. Are there any plans to use the latter lens for regular studio comparisons in the future?

Fair enough.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 20, 2015 at 00:57 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M5 II Review preview (814 comments in total)

I see that the regular studio comparison was done with the Oly 45mm and that the high-res comparison was with the Panny 42.5mm. Are there any plans to use the latter lens for regular studio comparisons in the future?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 19, 2015 at 22:24 UTC as 93rd comment | 3 replies

Quality looks very good to my eyes. There might be a few shots where the point of focus is slightly off where it should be, but if you look at the areas that *are* in focus, the detail is excellent.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 17, 2015 at 02:48 UTC as 14th comment | 3 replies

Outstanding shots. Thank you for sharing.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 8, 2015 at 22:22 UTC as 20th comment
In reply to:

Kurt_K: Interesting interview. I think I would seriously consider a Fuji if it wasn't for the X-trans sensor. I see people on here who say that the smudgy looking files are down to poor conversions through Lightroom but, honestly, the files I've seen from Capture One conversions don't look any better.

No, sorry, I have not seen samples done through Iridient.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 1, 2015 at 14:57 UTC

Interesting interview. I think I would seriously consider a Fuji if it wasn't for the X-trans sensor. I see people on here who say that the smudgy looking files are down to poor conversions through Lightroom but, honestly, the files I've seen from Capture One conversions don't look any better.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 28, 2015 at 20:35 UTC as 52nd comment | 3 replies

Excellent pricing.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 11, 2015 at 19:35 UTC as 20th comment

Definitely an improvement over the KS1, style-wise, although still not particularly attractive from the top view. Seems like a decent value.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 9, 2015 at 23:22 UTC as 68th comment

So if Flickr is where all the phone-snappers hang out, where have the camera-using photographers migrated to? 500px?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 16, 2015 at 22:57 UTC as 98th comment | 1 reply
On Quick Look: The art of the unforeground article (85 comments in total)
In reply to:

Vergilius: You know, after reading some of the sour comments on this thread, I'm glad that I'm an amateur with little technical knowledge. That way I'm able to just enjoy these photographs just because I think that they are gorgeous. Thanks for sharing!

Sour grapes = sour comments

Direct link | Posted on Jan 11, 2015 at 22:38 UTC
On Quick Look: The art of the unforeground article (85 comments in total)
In reply to:

luxor2: These photos might look better with the unforeground cropped away.

That second shot wouldn't be anywhere near as interesting as it is currently with the "unforeground" sand cropped out. I think both compositions are excellent as they are. Great work, Erez.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 10, 2015 at 19:45 UTC
Total: 72, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »