J A C S: A mixture of some great and unique images, like 4, 7, 8, and 11 and some overdone ones, like 1, 9 and 2 (is that a nuclear explosion in #2?).
As Ednaz said: #2 shows a sundog. I've seen them that pronounced as well. There's nothing overdone or "nuclear" about it.
Are we going to be seeing a full review of this camera before we see one for the Panasonic GX8? Just curious...
TN Args: Just goes to show that compact cameras are not dead if you show innovation.
@Karroly, Profit is profit; if Casio is succeeding where many of its competitors aren't, good on them. And I'm saying this as someone who has never taken a single selfie.
Speaking of the GX8, is the full review coming soon? Before Christmas perhaps?
Now if only Fuji would put a Bayer sensor in a higher end model...
They appear to be finished in Canada as well, at least according to the Camera Store, which was one of the few places that actually stocked Samsung gear.
I really hope Panasonic comes through with this 100-400, and sometime in the next year would be nice too.
My guess is that Americans will get some awesome deals but us Canadians will continue to get shafted.
I still don't understand why Panasonic isn't offering electronic first curtain shutter. Heck, my Samsung NX20 has EFCS and it was announced more than three years ago. Other than that, though, I don't really see much to nitpick about with this camera. It looks like a solid offering.
JakeB: When are we going to see a Nikon D400, the true replacement to my D300s???
Sorry. Wanted to post that before someone who was serious made that tired post.
What does Nikon have to compete with the NX1? Umm, how about lenses?
Some lovely work. I especially like #9.
I thought it was kind of humorous, though not nearly as humorous as this comment section. Why is everyone so bloody serious? C'mon, people, it's just a spoof ad.
Looks pretty good to me. I'd love to know what the buffer size is.
forpetessake: When will DPR stop publishing misleading numbers? It's NOT "a mind-blowing F2.8-6.5 24-2000mm equivalent zoom".
You either provide conversion for both f-stop and focal length, which are mind-blowing F14.6-33.8 24-2000mm FF equivalent. Or provide the physical parameters, which are F2.8-6.5 4.6-385mm.
It's hard to believe DPR continues making honest mistakes -- writing a F14.6-33.8 4.6-385mm would have been an honest mistake, and I've never seen that.
I swear some people live for comment section equivalency debates. Give it a rest already.
#8 is particularly beautiful.
rallyfan: Why harass the three elderly women in Spain?
Is it the end of the world that a photographer took a picture of three old women who obviously didn't want to be photographed? Certainly not, but that doesn't change the fact that a considerate person would have lowered his camera instead of pressing the shutter button.
No bracketing option at all? Seriously?
Why isn't there a performance page in this review? I'm having trouble finding info on buffer depth, specifically.
Kurt_K: I see that the regular studio comparison was done with the Oly 45mm and that the high-res comparison was with the Panny 42.5mm. Are there any plans to use the latter lens for regular studio comparisons in the future?
I see that the regular studio comparison was done with the Oly 45mm and that the high-res comparison was with the Panny 42.5mm. Are there any plans to use the latter lens for regular studio comparisons in the future?