Uwe Steinmueller

Uwe Steinmueller

Lives in United States South of San Jose, CA, United States
Works as a Photographer
Has a website at www.outbackphoto.com
Joined on Oct 24, 1999
About me:

Editor of Digital Outback Photo

Comments

Total: 10, showing: 1 – 10
On article Fujifilm XF 55-200mm F3.5-4.8 R LM OIS review (142 comments in total)

> And we can't totally ignore the fact that at around $700 / £580, this is one of the most expensive 'small' telephoto zooms on the market.

What would be a small zoom at the same price point that could match it in quality? I find the good Panasonic 35-100mm expensive. This zoom seems fair priced for the quality it delivers (I own and love it).

And yes, AF sucks . Not that big deal for me as I like to use tele on more static objects.

By the way the lens hood is not that great for mounting. Feels like these older Canon lens hoods.

Link | Posted on Sep 25, 2013 at 11:54 UTC as 53rd comment | 10 replies

Why is the excellent Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM missing.

Link | Posted on Apr 29, 2013 at 22:36 UTC as 10th comment | 1 reply
On article DxOMark examines lenses for the Canon EOS 5D Mark III (60 comments in total)

>1. How can a 22.3 MP camera get a P-Mpix score of almost 23? See articles 1st Sharpness graph.

Interesting. But how would they rate a Sigma DP2M? It has more visual resolution than most 24MP cameras.

Link | Posted on Apr 6, 2013 at 21:28 UTC as 12th comment | 1 reply
On article DxOMark examines lenses for the Canon EOS 5D Mark III (60 comments in total)

Can anybody tell me what the posted diagram is about and what DxO is telling us.

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2013 at 23:37 UTC as 15th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Uwe Steinmueller: Interesting concept but one number will hardly tell it all (corners, f-stops)

Here is a shocking graph from the DxOMark document:

http://www.dxomark.com/itext/articles/intro-pmpix/03.jpg

Would like to know why the excellent Sigma 35mm f/1.4 perform that low on the 7D?

Now corrected. Now it makes sense to me.

Link | Posted on Dec 17, 2012 at 17:00 UTC

Interesting concept but one number will hardly tell it all (corners, f-stops)

Here is a shocking graph from the DxOMark document:

http://www.dxomark.com/itext/articles/intro-pmpix/03.jpg

Would like to know why the excellent Sigma 35mm f/1.4 perform that low on the 7D?

Link | Posted on Dec 17, 2012 at 16:40 UTC as 83rd comment | 3 replies

The TV shot is really great.

Link | Posted on Nov 17, 2012 at 02:06 UTC as 15th comment
On Connect post Samsung Galaxy S3 Camera Review (54 comments in total)

>The Galaxy S3 achieves a good DxO Mark score of 72 which is means it is trailing very slightly behind the iPhone 5, iPhone 4S and HTC One X in our list of the best smartphone cameras.

A link to these reviews would be helpful.

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2012 at 15:24 UTC as 28th comment
On article Samsung Galaxy S3 Camera Review (54 comments in total)

>The Galaxy S3 achieves a good DxO Mark score of 72 which is means it is trailing very slightly behind the iPhone 5, iPhone 4S and HTC One X in our list of the best smartphone cameras.

A link to these reviews would be helpful.

Link | Posted on Nov 2, 2012 at 15:24 UTC as 28th comment
On article Subway - Photographs by Bruce Davidson (6 comments in total)

Seems to be a very interesting book (title photo is excellent)

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2011 at 20:13 UTC as 6th comment
Total: 10, showing: 1 – 10