cameramen

cameramen

Lives in Uruguay Montevideo, Uruguay
Joined on Mar 22, 2005

Comments

Total: 11, showing: 1 – 11
In reply to:

cameramen: Where are the specifications?

thanks

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2012 at 04:54 UTC
In reply to:

Mike Cialowicz: $1400 and they make you spend an extra $225 for a tripod collar... ridiculous. I was really looking forward to this lens, especially since it's lighter and smaller than the 2.8 version, which makes it great for hiking. However, at $1625, looks like it's a big skip.

Can't wait to see what the Tokina 70-200 f/4 is like.

Yep it is lighter for hiking; would you carry a tripod when hiking? which weight it has?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2012 at 04:28 UTC
In reply to:

Combatmedic870: Took them a while.....I wonder if it will be better then the legendary canon 70-200 F4 IS L

Yep it took six years more. And the Canon is the first with four stops for Canon, while the Nikon is the first with five stops for Nikon! It seems they were serious at the time introducing the lenses.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2012 at 04:26 UTC

Where are the specifications?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2012 at 04:22 UTC as 89th comment | 2 replies
On Photokina 2012 Roundup article (102 comments in total)
In reply to:

Retzius: And the only Photokina in recent history where Nikon and Canon released NOTHING for DX, thereby neglecting the segment that accounts for 90% of their camera sales.

Yeah, they ignored 90% of their base. Smart move.

True they didn't announce a crop camera. However what I said about lenses is valid both for crop and full frame! (and they announced full frame cameras, why not at least a full frame lens to accompany it?)

Direct link | Posted on Sep 26, 2012 at 23:02 UTC
On Photokina 2012 Roundup article (102 comments in total)

It's the Photokina with less DSLR lens announcements: no one for the two most important players: Nikon, Canon. Canon even didn't officialy announce the 200-400.
Nice in announcements from full frame, compact, mirrorless bodies.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 26, 2012 at 22:35 UTC as 38th comment

FTMF says the release for two lenses, but the spec list says only for the pancake

Direct link | Posted on Jun 8, 2012 at 04:36 UTC as 76th comment | 1 reply
On Sony DSC-RX100 preview (544 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ivan Lietaert: Dpreview gives wrong information.
Is it f1.8-f4.9, as is in the comparison table.
Or is it f1.8-f5.9 as is in the specs table.

just look at the pic: 4,9

Direct link | Posted on Jun 6, 2012 at 06:11 UTC
On Nikon announces D4 'multi-media' DSLR article (231 comments in total)

here it says: "Articulated LCD Tilting" but I don't find it in official sites

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2012 at 04:45 UTC as 70th comment

*1 means ISO less than 3200?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 18, 2011 at 05:11 UTC as 183rd comment | 8 replies

Isn't a mistake in the weight at 143g?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 27, 2011 at 19:05 UTC as 45th comment | 1 reply
Total: 11, showing: 1 – 11