dmanthree

Let's face it, the pace of true innovation in digital cameras has slowed, and there's precious little advantage when buying the latest and greatest cams. SLRs, like the CaNikons, have a longer life...

You may hear that from a few vocal users, but most mirrorless users are far more realistic.

Good God, the constant clicking back and forth is incredibly annoying. I gave up. I'm pretty sure any camera could have taken any of the pictures.  :-)

If you want a fisheye, get the Panny. But only *after* you get the 7-14. It's far superior to the Oly 9-18. Not that the Oly is a bad lens, but the Panny is a lot better.

I can see the difference on paper and on screen. It's not theoretical, it's real. FF cameras are still better, and that's a fact. There is no m4/3 camera that is useful for actions sports that...

I shoot a GH3 because the sensor and camera are plenty good enough for me. But it's still no match for any FF Canon or Nikon. Forget the numbers, look at the images! m4/3 has *nothing* to match...

iPhones? Please. Let's see the PJ shots that require telephotos. Shots taken in low light. Action shots. Anything that required abilities beyond what a simple P&S cam can do. This is a joke....

Interesting, but the writer nearly ignores the advantages of Canon and Nikon DSLRs! First off, they produce better IQ. Larger sensors still mean better IQ, in general. Can't escape that any more...

So a Sony sensor would have been needed to shoot Mr. Ed, I guess. Here's the "proof." http://www.snopes.com/lost/mistered.asp

Agreed, I like the first shot better. The second is much too flat. Also, the original was underexposed fir the subject. Better to open up a little and reign in the highlights.

Ah. Gotcha.

Well, I think it's funny, if nothing else. Remember, sometimes a joke is just a joke.

That depends on your definition of what constitutes "all the basics." For me, that includes composition, and not just putting a properly exposed image file on a memory card. So, in my opinion, the...

And the death spiral of quality photography continues. What plagues professionals outside PJ has, apparently, spread to PJ, which is a shame. Now we'll see crappy photos, and even crappier videos....

Maybe, but that's a topic for another time and place.  :-) Let me re-phrase: it takes only a couple of minutes to learn how to create an image using a camera. Real photography is another matter...

Wait.... Isn't there a law that says you have to use a FF DSLR for this stuff? :-)

I see at least one every time I leave the house. Kidding aside, I do see more of them by the week. Not as many as DSLRs, but the numbers are increasing, no question.

Honestly, the vast majority of my prints are 13" x 19" and smaller. But it's nice to know you *can* go big if and when you want to. If all my prints were small I wouldn't be using a GH3. I'd...

Yes, but I misspoke. 4.5', not 4'. But it is 6 feet wide. I upsample the raw file in Photoshop CS6 so that it's 150dpi at that size, and send the file out for printing. If you upsample in steps the...

While "good enough" is a very subjective term, I can tell you that the first 4' x 6' print from my GH3 is up to par in every way, and comparable to similar size prints from my Canon FF cams. With...