misha marinsky4

Also, it cost $10 to process the film, and reload the camera with a fresh roll.

That would be ~$237.00, in constant dollars.

Buy a Kodak 1. No flash at all, nor batteries.

Kids these days.

Best comment on this thread.

Actually, it took Kodak 123 years to send DPR a camera for testing.

To all the naysayers: This is Moore's Law in action.

Think of it as a chart, with the lines of APS, FF and camera phone converging.

I have a G1X. I won't go to a smaller chip. I live the OVF, rather than an EVF.

As a licensed optician, who spent most of his time as a lab tech, I'm impressed.

Most of what is in the photographs, is what I am familiar with. Great story.

"a pair of Gucci or Rayban sunglasses with a SINGLE piece of UV-protected plastic can cost the same?"

I worked as a licensed optician for 22 years. Those sunglasses cost ~US $30.00 to manufacture....

What's your number?

Hush - you're going to spoil the gravy train.

"The app takes care of that."

Is there an app for the nervous breakdown, after all this?

The sixth step is throwing everything out the window.

Red safe-light? I used a Kodak OC filter safe-light, which is not red.

To quote John McEnroe, "you cannot be serious."

"A snap of the fingers turns off the smartphone image...Another snap of the fingers tells the smartphone to begin the image exposure."

Don't forget to wear your tap-dance shoes. You could make a...

Gimmick? It's a toy for hipsters.

First, someone wants to resurrect e-film again - an idea that died in 2001. Then, someone else wants to make a mobile phone into an enlarger.

Are these ventures of zombies?

I have a Cokin blue/yellow P173 polarizer. It's far less expensive than the Singh-Ray.

I use it with my dSLR and MILC. Thoughts/critique from others?

"A film camera is like a mortgage, with payments for life." - Pedro Meyer

"A film camera is like a mortgage, with payments for life."
- Pedro Meyer