chaos215bar2

chaos215bar2

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Apr 12, 2008

Comments

Total: 43, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Gesture: Don't care if I get panned. USPS is superb. The speed packages go cross-country and the local delivery person knows you and watches for your items. The "deficits" are because of the way USPS must fund pension and health care obligations vis a vis other nonprofit organizations, as I understand it.

I find less "crush" issues when USPS and FedEx deliver a package. A great postal system is an important part of a democracy.

USPS is great in terms of getting a package from one post office to another, but the experience from there depends a lot on the local delivery person. Where I am, UPS and Fedex always deliver to the door. USPS might leave a notice in the mail box if you're lucky, and good luck getting them to actually pickup the notice if you want to request redelivery. Basically, you need to just track the package and deal directly with the post office when it arrives.

What I find USPS is really good for is international orders. UPS and Fedex frequently make a big deal about customs and fees. I've never had a problem with the handoff between USPS and the local postal service in the origin / destination country. Of course there are some countries where the local postal service itself can be problematic.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 1, 2014 at 03:40 UTC
On Nikon D810: What You Need to Know article (142 comments in total)
In reply to:

jnxr: Nikon need 2 tries to get it right for every FF model:
D4 ---> D4s
D600 ---> D610
D800 ---> D810
Moral of the story, don't buy their first model, wait for the fixed version.

I've been pretty happy with my D800 for the past 2 years. The only thing I really wish they'd add is 2 and 3 stop bracketing (which the D600 has, amusingly), but I'm not sure even the D810 addresses that.

I did always think it was kind of silly that phones released around the same time as the D800 could do 1080p60, but it couldn't, though.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 27, 2014 at 15:27 UTC
On Nikon D810: What You Need to Know article (142 comments in total)

"Naturally though [the slight blurring due to the OLPF] also means that in terms of raw resolution, you're never quite seeing the potential of your camera's pixel count"

That isn't entirely accurate. The true resolution of a 36 MP Bayer sensor is 18 MP in green and 9 MP in red and blue. You could store the result in a standard 18 MP file without losing anything and still have 50% more pixel data than you need. A 36 MP sensor does not have the potential to produce an accurate, sharp 36 MP color image.

The point of the OLPF is to distribute each color of light over the corresponding pixels so there are no holes. That means you won't get super sharp, aliased lines, but you also won't end up with artifacts (moire) by trying to imagine details that the sensor can't actually resolve. Without the OLPF, you're just taking the 36 MP grayscale image, throwing away some colors at each pixel, and hoping you don't lose anything important.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 27, 2014 at 07:05 UTC as 40th comment | 6 replies
On Nikon announces full-frame D810 with no OLPF article (98 comments in total)
In reply to:

backayonder: So is this a poor man's D4s ? And good enough for sports

No, this is a very different camera from the D4/D4s.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 19:11 UTC
On Nikon announces full-frame D810 with no OLPF article (98 comments in total)
In reply to:

MarshallG: Anybody else a little leery about this trend of removing the low pass and anti-aliasing filters? Surely there were good reasons to use them in the first place.

And when you're trying to shoot a scene that does generate moire at 36 MP, using a lens that can resolve the detail?

The reasons for adding an AA filter at 4 MP are just as valid at 36 MP. If your scene doesn't have the detail, it will make little difference unless you like to view images straight out of the camera at 100% and marvel at how sharp aliased lines can be. If it does, an AA filter avoids nasty sampling artifacts (moire) that software can really only guess at how to resolve. Once you capture the image without an AA filter, the information needed to correctly disambiguate true low frequency detail from false detail created by high frequencies the camera isn't equipped to capture anyway is gone.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 19:08 UTC
On Leica M Monochrom now available in grayscale (sort of) article (137 comments in total)
In reply to:

samfan: I just calculated that if I'd shot a roll of Tri-X every day, and had it developed and scanned, even the mono Leica M would pay for itself in just 18 months (probably sooner if you factor in the cost of a decent film M body).

Buying bulk and developing and scanning yourself - and the M pays for itself much sooner in saved time.

I don't know why are so many people so confused. Film is bloody expensive.

Sure, but so is this camera.

Direct link | Posted on May 27, 2014 at 00:07 UTC

This is neat, but I can't figure one thing out. Did they intentionally vary the exposure and shutter trigger time slightly, or could they not actually figure out how to synchronize the cameras correctly? I don't dislike the effect (it kind of goes with the theme of street photography), but I wouldn't mind if it looked more intentional.

Aside from that, it would be nice if this was a bit more than just a Microsoft / Lumia ad.

Direct link | Posted on May 24, 2014 at 17:44 UTC as 45th comment
On Melt: Portrait of an Iceberg article (40 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael Piziak: Very good photos of icebergs. #7 is very large I think.

You think?

Direct link | Posted on May 18, 2014 at 18:04 UTC

So, how does the capacity compare to a regular battery?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 11, 2014 at 15:19 UTC as 14th comment
On Up close: The beauty of butterfly wings article (47 comments in total)
In reply to:

ozimax: Astonishing images. And just think, it took a Creator God to make these impossibly complex animals. He not only makes things work, He makes them beautiful at the same time.

Kudos to the photographer.

PaulDavis, this comment and a couple of the responses are akin to trying to show someone just how wonderful a perfectly baked pie is by throwing it in their face. Throwing beliefs (presented as truths) that can never be rationally argued in other people's faces is extremely disrespectful to whatever beliefs they might already have and rarely leads to any productive discussion.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 7, 2014 at 05:26 UTC
On Nikon D4s and Lexar 400x or 1000x memory card problems article (37 comments in total)
In reply to:

dwill23: there's also a problem with this camera taking good pics

I think that's a problem with the photographer, not the camera.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2014 at 22:53 UTC
On Chinese government orders Nikon to stop selling D600 article (228 comments in total)
In reply to:

Karl Summers: I own a D610 and have had zero issues thus far. Just wanted to put that out there. Nikon makes a fine camera, they could use some lessons in PR and customer service.

Yes, the camera that was arguably released specifically to address the design problems with the D600 shutter. Nikon does generally make great cameras, but the D600 obviously had issues and a lot of people are quite understandably unhappy with the way Nikon handled them.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2014 at 20:38 UTC
On Stunning 360-degree view from One World Trade Center article (70 comments in total)
In reply to:

stromaroma: The irony is that Americans actually believe they have freedom... "One World", yeah right, this building is a great way to stick it in the face of the rest of the world that the Wall Street bankers enslave the world via the One Bank.

It's "One World Trade Center", as in the primary building of a complex proposed in the 40s, originally built in the 60s and 70s, and recently rebuilt. But go ahead and intentionally misinterpret the name.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 12, 2014 at 06:30 UTC
On Wyoming's stunning weather and landscapes in time-lapse article (231 comments in total)
In reply to:

LensBeginner: Astonishing!
How'd he manage to move the frame? camera movement on a slow-moving rig or PP?

So what about the vertigo effect? Slider plus post processing for the zoom? (It was really smooth!)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 16, 2014 at 06:15 UTC
On Wyoming's stunning weather and landscapes in time-lapse article (231 comments in total)
In reply to:

Biological_Viewfinder: Nicolaus Wegner,

Hey, one thing kept bothering me about this video shoot from a technical standpoint. And I'm not talking about your rail. It could be any single image from the entire video.

So my problem with it is that I can't explain the aperture to myself in your photography. As a Landscape Photographer, I am very well aware about how difficult taking a good picture outside actually is. Most people look at stuff like yours and say, Man that guy was lucky, look at the lighting he got! What they fail to realize is that you have to act so very quickly during light that is changing by the minute! Just a passing cloud can change everything.

One of the things about Landscape Photography that is different than almost anything else is bokeh is mostly meaningless. It's all about depth of field. So I know that you have your aperture closed down. But after so much, it starts diffracting. But EVERYTHING is so sharp from stuff you could touch out to infinity. HOW are you doing THAT?!?!?

Keep in mind these videos are scaled down significantly from the original photos. Even at f20, the kind of effects your describing will only be visible at near 100% scale with most lenses. (In other words, don't be afraid to stop down if it's the only way to get the depth of field you want. You won't be losing that much sharpness, and it might be just what you need to capture the shot.)

Direct link | Posted on Jan 16, 2014 at 06:09 UTC
In reply to:

Patco: Dear Nikon,

Please exert less effort on engineering 3rd party incompatibilities, and more effort on creating a high-end DX D300 replacement.

Thank You

If, as Patco and others are implying, Nikon engineered this incompatibility intentionally, then people have every right to be upset (even if Nikon does arguably have every right to do what they did). That would mean Nikon was intentionally devaluating people's existing lens collection, which sounds like a great reason to think about switching to another system.

Even if this wasn't intentional, Nikon has to be aware that breaking computability with existing lenses, even third party lenses, isn't exactly an encouraging move for people who've bought into the system or are thinking about doing so.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 4, 2013 at 06:12 UTC
On Nikon Df combines classic design with modern technology article (313 comments in total)

It would be nice if you could post just one article for new product launches, so all the comments ended up in the same place. Three is a little ridiculous (though I realize each one is technically something different).

Direct link | Posted on Nov 5, 2013 at 04:05 UTC as 148th comment | 5 replies
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1396 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: Making it only shoot photographs doesn't mean it shoots better photographs. It just means you took out something(Video) that every other manufacturer wouldn't dream of leaving it out and called it retro.

People will buy this camera but they will be wasting their money.

I don't see any good reason to leave out video functionality at this point. On the D800, it only adds a couple extra controls which really don't get in the way when you're not using them, and the functionality is nice to have on occasion.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 1, 2013 at 18:51 UTC
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1396 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jogger: Looks like a D700 successor. Also, love the retro NIKON lettering.

Why do you say that (implying the D800 isn't really a D700 successor)? I would say it looks like a redesigned D800, which is fine. If this looks like what I imagine and at least has feature parity with the D800, I would certainly buy it over a D800.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 1, 2013 at 18:50 UTC
On Can computer corrections make simple lenses look good? article (162 comments in total)
In reply to:

ZAnton: I assume there are too many variables to calculate good result.
For example LoCAs are distant dependent, so unless we know the distance to ALL objects on the photo, we can't calculate back the initial image.
Similar with non-flat focus-plane (field curvature). If the object is blurred by that, one must know the distance to the object for the reverse calculation of the "ideal" image.

You don't even have accurate distance information within the focus "point", since it's actually a region of the image, some of which is likely to be out of focus.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 20, 2013 at 18:22 UTC
Total: 43, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »