Fotogeneticist

Fotogeneticist

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Mar 27, 2011

Comments

Total: 78, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 Review preview (825 comments in total)
In reply to:

Fotogeneticist: An amazing camera with every function that a photographer needs and more. Yeah, a tilt screen would've been useful, touch screen... etc. Personally, I don't use those, so not a problem for me. The 4/3rd sensor is somewhat misleading, but I see the benefit of the suboptimal use of the sensor area in that it allows the use of different aspect ratios, which provides better results than cropping the main intended format... HOWEVER, what is with the 1:1 aspect ratio? The 1:1 aspect ratio mode is merely a crop of the 4:3. While I rarely shoot 1:1 except with my old Hasselblad, I could see a use for it with some of my subjects. It's a shame the 1:1 ratio was so poorly implemented.

The dimension of the native sensor could have accommodated a higher resolution crop than it does, at least based on the diagram above.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 20, 2014 at 04:37 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 Review preview (825 comments in total)

An amazing camera with every function that a photographer needs and more. Yeah, a tilt screen would've been useful, touch screen... etc. Personally, I don't use those, so not a problem for me. The 4/3rd sensor is somewhat misleading, but I see the benefit of the suboptimal use of the sensor area in that it allows the use of different aspect ratios, which provides better results than cropping the main intended format... HOWEVER, what is with the 1:1 aspect ratio? The 1:1 aspect ratio mode is merely a crop of the 4:3. While I rarely shoot 1:1 except with my old Hasselblad, I could see a use for it with some of my subjects. It's a shame the 1:1 ratio was so poorly implemented.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 20, 2014 at 01:43 UTC as 76th comment | 3 replies
On Readers' showcase: Landscape photography article (90 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael Piziak: I wish HDR was never invented.

Poorly done HDR can be an eyesore, but HDR used to overcome the disadvantage sensors have compared to the eye is a necessity in some scenes. With all tools, you must fight the tendency to misuse it.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 28, 2014 at 05:53 UTC
On Ricoh GR comparative review preview (37 comments in total)

Here's the advantage most people don't notice:
Flash sync speed: 1/2000 sec!!! This means you can use fill flash in bright daylight without a neutral density filter! You can capture things no other camera can. This is better than every professional D-SLR on the market. And with the standard hotshoe (unlike my Nikon V1), you can do some off-camera flash using a wireless transmitter like a Pocket Wizard. This is a professional's tool. Perhaps once my Nikon V1 dies, I'll get one of these.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 24, 2014 at 05:24 UTC as 2nd comment
On Ricoh announces Pentax K-3 Prestige Edition article (165 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marty4650: Ricoh clearly lacks the vision needed to cash in on commemorative editions.

They bundle a $1,000 camera with a $215 battery grip, and two Pentax batteries worth another $100, and then give the whole package a stunning finish. Then they sell this gorgeous $1,315 bundle for only $1,399!

That's right. A lousy $84 more than an off the shelf regular version.

Hassleblad would have given it an exotic wood grip, named it "The Constellation Edition" and sold it for $9,000.

Leica would have sold this for $20,000, or roughly a $10,000 premium over their usual price, and had a waiting list for it.

But Ricoh only tacks on 84 bucks!

(Seriously, this is a great deal. If I was in the market for a K3, I'd order one of these special editions immediately.)

I wish I was back in the Ricoh camp. I've been a fan of Ricoh since the original film GR21 cameras. They know how to make cameras for photographers, not just pixel peepers or hipsters. I got into digital with a Ricoh RDC almost 17 years ago. Then I jumped on the GRD and GRD2 10 years later as soon as they were released. If I wasn't spending all my money on cycling these days, I'd probably be purchasing a Ricoh GRD APS-C. And Ricoh knows how to do firmware updates. You buy a Ricoh and it's firmware support doesn't necessarily end when the latest camera comes around. They actually listen to their customers. I still remember when we were asking for a full press snap mode and not so long afterwards, it showed up in a firmware upgrade.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 24, 2014 at 04:12 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (646 comments in total)
In reply to:

DuxX: A good camera with incompetent sensor. The minimum size of the sensor for any serious camera should be APS-C. Sorry Nikon.

DuxX, as Andy points out, the word "never" is where you are wrong. My APS-C from 12 years ago is nowhere as good as the quality of my 1" sensor from 2 years ago. You're missing a key element, and that is technology improves. And the cycle of improvement has gotten so fast. With my old Nikon V1, I'm taking photos that are giving my D700 full frame camera a run for its money. Not quite the same at high ISO, but close enough to get me high quality landscape photos that I would feel comfortable printing at 13x19. See my V1 photos at https://www.flickr.com/photos/fotogeneticist

Direct link | Posted on Jul 20, 2014 at 22:13 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (646 comments in total)
In reply to:

MikeReidDesign: Why do cameras cost so much these days? Seems like the prices keep rising every year.

That being said, for me, the J4 may be the way to go. IQ looks on par with the other 1" sensor (RX100) except in shadows, which is OK with care in your exposure (a basic photography skill). Most importantly, it's priced right.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 19, 2014 at 02:35 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (646 comments in total)
In reply to:

MikeReidDesign: Why do cameras cost so much these days? Seems like the prices keep rising every year.

It all boils down to "biggest capability, smallest size". Capability can be measured in many ways. Image quality, responsiveness, user interface, etc. Even image quality itself can be measured in different way (high ISO performance, low ISO performance, dynamic range, color). For most people, image quality is the main capability they want. Given similar pixel counts and sensor technologies, larger sensor equals better image quality. Thus, there is no way around it. The market wants a full frame camera in a compact (perhaps V3 sized) body with DSLR responsiveness. The first one to get there wins. Don't waste time on compromises. Start developing the inevitable end state.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 19, 2014 at 02:32 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (646 comments in total)
In reply to:

Banhmi: Puked in my mouth when I saw the low light IQ at ISO 3200.

Look at RAW Sony RX100 Mk III side by side with RAW V3 at all ISOs greater than 1600.

The RAW images at the higher ISOs look nearly identical, with the V3 resolving more detail. The real problem here is the JPG engine. They need a better one. A little less aggressive NR in JPGs would be welcome. I think the problem is more in the color detail. The NR for color noise is "muddying" the colors. I could easily use this camera's RAW images.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 19, 2014 at 00:24 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (646 comments in total)
In reply to:

Thematic: Bummer. I was interested in this camera. Seemed like fun...

But those sample photos are worse than apsc cams costing half as much.

I will rent one and try to keep an open mind.

The JPG samples have some heavy handed NR for sure, but I'm happy with how the RAW images look, especially in comparison to the other 1" sensors at high ISO. The difference between the Sony RX 100 and V3 decreases as ISO increases. Low ISO is already acceptable. It's the detail in shadows where the others have the advantage, which is only a problem if you do extensive post processing. For landscapes, I blend exposures so it wouldn't be a problem for me. I do miss the latitude I had with my D700 though, although I'm very happy with the decrease in the weight of my entire kit.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 18, 2014 at 01:37 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (646 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kay Fisher: I was excited to see the V1 but couldn't understand or live without bracketing.
I watched for firmware update for bracketing but...
Then the V2 came out - still no bracketing..
Then the V3 came out and still no bracketing and now they took off the viewfinder.
Go figure.

Richard, just for the record, I don't wear belt-and-suspenders. ;-)

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 19:37 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (646 comments in total)
In reply to:

Scottelly: Thank you DPreview! I was amazed to see that the V3 has superior resolution to the Nikon D7100 in the corners of the image, especially as the center of the V3 image shows there is not as much resolving power as the D7100. It looks like the V3 lens produces better resolution in the corners than the lens that was used on the D7100, which indicates to me that it is not so much the camera's limitations as the lens limitations. I was very surprised to see how good the images from this little 18 MP camera seem to be. Now I KNOW I want a V3.

Actually I've looked at images from the camera on Imaging Resource and image quality in RAW (not JPEG) seriously look great all the way up to ISO 1600. The limitations of shadow detail, however, leaves little room for post processing, so that is where the IQ difference is apparent, not in out of camera photos. That's my take on this. If you expose for the shadows and don't need to post process, out of camera photos are perfectly acceptable. This is a tool that has a good blend of acceptable image quality (minus post-processing latitude), blazing fast AF, and silent operation. So, image quality is not the reason I would not buy this camera. For me, it is the fact I already have a V1 and the things I am waiting for like CLS compatibility or standard hot shoe, bracketing, are still not there. Oh yes, and the price--it's approximately $300 more than I'd pay for with the kit lens. Actually, I wouldn't even buy the kit lens if I had a choice.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 19:00 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (646 comments in total)
In reply to:

sadatoni: What an ugly camera.

Not as "ugly" as the V2. But it's all in the eye of the beholder. For me, aesthetics is a function of utility. Something becomes uglier the more "decorative" it gets, where the exaggerated curves serve no purpose. Those curvaceous lumps that some companies call cameras are an example. I prefer the utilitarian aesthetics of cameras like the Olympus OMD, old film cameras like the Nikon F3, rangefinders like the Contax G, Leicas, etc. But like you, I only represent one segment of consumers.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 18:45 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (646 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kay Fisher: I was excited to see the V1 but couldn't understand or live without bracketing.
I watched for firmware update for bracketing but...
Then the V2 came out - still no bracketing..
Then the V3 came out and still no bracketing and now they took off the viewfinder.
Go figure.

For those of us who shoot high DR images (>11 stops DR), bracketing is VERY useful, and this camera, with it's limited dynamic range in the shadows makes it a requirement for some photographs. I often use the setting sun in my landscapes and even with my D700, used exposure blending to capture it simultaneously while capturing foreground detail. Bracketing is VERY useful for landscape photographers who want to go beyond the limitations of digital sensors. http://www.pbase.com/atmabini/image/111165379

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 03:31 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (646 comments in total)
In reply to:

Saldahna: I wonder how many of you guys have seriuosley tried to use the V3 and other cameras of the V series. I'm a SLR Shooter but my D800 and the holy trinity stay more an more at home, or will be used for Landscapes. Please try this camera by yourself before you judge.I've tried the Sony A6000 but the back screen is like a mirror....and the Lenses are to big. I want something small with power. That is the V3 with EVF and Grip. I love my DSLR but I also love these small V series cameras.

Take a look at Imaging Resource's test shots. They are much better... however, Nikon's JPEGs are terrible. RAW is the way to go with this camera--which works for me. They seriously need to do a firmware upgrade to improve their JPEG engine from the start. In the images on this site, at ISO 1600, the Nikon V3 RAW images look sharper than the Sony RX 100 Mk III RAW images.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 03:25 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (646 comments in total)
In reply to:

SammyToronto: Put the Sony RX sensor in this Nikon, take the grip and EVF off the kit (not everyone needs a grip/EVF) and bring the price down to the $700 range and it can be a contender. As it is, it's a very tough sell (unless bright light focus speed is your number one priority) with all the excellent competitors available with better image quality and at markedly lower prices.

So in other words, put the Sony RX sensor in the J4?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 17, 2014 at 03:11 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (646 comments in total)
In reply to:

Kay Fisher: I was excited to see the V1 but couldn't understand or live without bracketing.
I watched for firmware update for bracketing but...
Then the V2 came out - still no bracketing..
Then the V3 came out and still no bracketing and now they took off the viewfinder.
Go figure.

I agree completely. Bracketing is huge, especially when limited by dynamic range. Is it that hard to do this?

Here's another thing I've been waiting for in the V series: Creative Lighting System compatibility. Without off camera flash capability, a camera is in the point and shoot category. The ability to control lighting is one of the things that I think separates a camera suitable for professional use from a point and shoot (manual control being the most important feature of a pro camera, of course).
I can still work with the camera, but it would really be helpful if Nikon would listen up to its most faithful supporters and start including some of these basic features, otherwise, Nikon will continue to lose them. I'm on the fence now on this V3.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 16, 2014 at 20:23 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (646 comments in total)
In reply to:

grumpycat: who will buy this thing???

Lin,

I do the same, I often stitch photographs together, however, from my DSLR days, I wouldn't completely discount the advantages of ultra wide angle. I've made use of the 14mm FOV with an FX sensor in many of my photographs and I will say that I pretty much solely shoot in the 14mm-24mm range nowadays. I would welcome a Nikon CX lens with an equivalent FOV and wider constant aperture... the CX equivalent of the legendary 14-24mm f/2.8, which I still keep even though I don't have a DSLR anymore.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 16, 2014 at 19:58 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (646 comments in total)
In reply to:

grumpycat: who will buy this thing???

Hertz,

Changing this discussion from the apparent limitations of the V3 into a string of comments like "dumb people buy dumb things", or "this camera is for no-one with more then 4 functional braincells" is immature. I am a competent photographer and the Nikon 1 series has a place in my arsenal. I don't think I'll be buying the V3 (possibly the J4) due to the price, but if I did have a V3, I guarantee I could get over every one of its limitations, which I would be willing to do in order to reap the advantages of its fast AF and reach. I assure you, I have more than 4 functional braincells and I know how to use a camera.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 16, 2014 at 19:52 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (646 comments in total)
In reply to:

57even: Hmm, can't see many early adopters. Nikon, get a decent sensor, quick!

Better still, put all this excellent technology in an APSC body. You would probably sell millions.

I agree with HowaboutRAW... the JPEGs from this thing are not doing it justice. But I still think Nikon is 1-2 stops away from the perfect camera. I've been using a Nikon V1 to great effect as my D700 replacement. I've learned to work around its limitations in shadow details. I expose for the shadows rather than the highlights and use "other methods" to compensate for highlights.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 16, 2014 at 04:03 UTC
Total: 78, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous1234Next ›Last »