Tape5: I invite people to download a few OM-D samples from this site and compare them on their computers at 100% magnification with some RX100 samples.
It is your right to know and to speak out! Join the '' All-This-OMD-Thing-Is-Getting-A-Bit-Silly'' party and exercise your right to express your opinion. And take it easy on the turkey.
The stylus ? I don't think so.
113x65.4x48mm --vs102x59x36 mm of RX100 and
346 grams --vs240 of RX100.
with the RX100's higher resolution and larger Sony sensor and the fine-tuned Zeiss lens?
I invite people to download a few OM-D samples from this site and compare them on their computers at 100% magnification with some RX100 samples.
I feel happy for all the OM-D EM-5 owners and how they think their camera is the best thing that has ever been manufactured.
But I feel sort of sad for them because they have not tried the RX100.
So there you go. Happiness and ignorance have always been intertwined.
Kendall Helmstetter Gelner: The Sigma DP-2M should have been included on this list. Nothing else in that form factor can match the lens and sensor combination for images. In that regard it's far more of a jump than the incremental improvements that all of the other cameras on the list exhibit.
Especially in the realm of print, the DP-2M is like having a D800E in your pocket - IF you can find a lens as sharp!
Only for ISOs below 10 for five minutes.
BillyShooter: Greetings one and all. I'm now an official member here and this is my first post. I've read many of your posts on "2012 Camera of the Year" and cannot pick anything as I have only a D7000. However, I will continue to read and learn about this craft as best I can. As a whole, the site has much more to offer than I could digest, even with the best spices. What an amazing time to participate in photography !
Greetings. If you have just joined you cannot be an official member yet. The official membership takes like 15 years. That is if you live in Seattle. If you are elsewhere it may take up to 40 years.
The other thing is that if you like to read and learn about the craft of photography you have come to the wrong place. Here you only learn how insomniacs defend cameras they have never used and attack cameras they love to use. ( Yeah it is the other way around because the brains are adversely affected by lack of sleep ).
And finally if you feel that the site has more to offer than you can digest, I don't know maybe you have a digestion problem, like irritable bowel or something.
webneep: Merry Christmas! Great to see little Olympus do so well. I voted for the RX100 as I have one (and a D800), but the mere fact that it fits in my shirt pocket and produces stunning images makes it my favourite. The D800 is great and I love the amazing detail it captures, but it means I have to carry a heavy backpack with huge lenses to get the quality results.
Most people who are bothered too much by the weight of their gear are probably fussing too much over them. If they are treated like junk, one is more likely to take them around. This expensive heavy equipment desensitisation can be helped by lending your camera to others for a week at a time or grabbing a nail and digging some deep scratches on its back or monitor.
Using this technique my 5D2 has become nearly weightless.
vassilis gazelos: Hi all, I'm trying to decide on a new compact/bridge camera and this review came out on time even though it doesn't inlcude the bridge/large zoom cameras! I don't have first hand real life experience of either of these so I'm trying to narrow down the selection from the reviews and comments. I'm looking for the best image quality, full manual control, widest angle 24mm/25mm, long exposure, braketing. I was considering the FZ200 or SX50HS however these have significnalty smaller sensors than the ones reviewed in this article. Could anyone assist me with some real life experience and regardless of the budget how these different types compare. Is the image quality (and Depth of Field) of the comeras here noticeably better? P.S> The only reference I have is via a friend's Canon older Gseries which produced some relay good results (I don't rememer the widest angle though). My experience ranges from a SLR Canon F1 (multiple lenses) to a point a shoot Sony DSC T7 Thank you
Go with the one that has been the most controversial, that has the highest megapixel count, the best video quality and is the most expensive and that is your best chance.
bildeb: thought I would use the D800e as a back-up to my beloved D3s, but since I got the D800e I have not used the D3s.. really amazed at what the D800e does as a portrait camera.
Good to see some people speak about their experiences of using the clear winner of this title for 2012. Keep taking great pictures.
bshelly42: The Olympus OM-D is nothing close to being a camera of the year. You're kidding, right?
That is like a carrot stick winning a competition, like for the most orange vegetable that can boil for an hour and still keep its shape.
Mike Brown: The only point here is to "shoot", so how can one be better than the others?Each to his own and to own any one of these fine cameras is the only true win for all. No point in shooting otherwise. I think I made a point but now I'm not sure. Just shooting the breeze. Is that possible? And which camera on this list can do that? None, so what's the point?
I thought you were making a point but since you showed some doubt makes me think maybe you were not making a point.
And yes I think a breeze can be photographed indirectly.
How about a poll that asks two questions from the participants:
What is your favourite current camera that you are using?
What would you like to swap it with if cost was not an issue? and to take three choices here not one.
The results can be tabulated in interesting ways.
The definition of a best camera for me is the one that is going to make a dent in photographic history. A camera that represents a turning point in some aspect of photography.
A bit weird that people have voted for the OM-D EM-5 to actually go past D800, not to mention winners like the RX1, RX100, A99 ( who on earth would have thought to see three Sonies here !) as well as the great GH3. A better camera than D800E? The MF for the masses? How?
The Oly has obviously sold a lot.
I will remember 2012 as the year in which you could finally place a full frame Sony-Zeiss camera with a 35 mm lens inside your jacket pocket.
Well forget about all your Canon and m43s and your monochrome Schmeicas of the world. Forget also all the phone jokes. My choice was between :
And in this final list RX100 wins because it is under 500 pounds and it is pocketable and it makes prints that can be shuffled into a pile of d800 prints without anyone noticing that they are from a P&S !!
RX1 loses because of its price.
Now give me a Phaseone please with a 35 mm lens and one IQ180. Talking to Santa here...
This is your last holiday season chance to choose one. And let me be extra nice and help you out here a bit in the good spirit of the new year coming up:
It is RX100 kids. Hands down. With a double twist.
Not my definition or unitor measurement or measurement devices ( if any ) or labor question or interest.
I am jealous. I have always wanted to define a unit and have the only device in town to measure it.
Why do people constantly talk about ''emotion'' in relation to photography? The problem with a pre-occupation with a desire to ''deliver emotional impact'' is that things get a bit cheesy. Because pro photographers will always be only pre-occupied with making more money and fame and winning more prizes than to deliver emotional impact free of charge. So we end up getting lame photographs of emotional impact being delivered to someone else. Art reduced to curiosity and voyeurism. The wounded citizen or Warren Buffett, take your pick.
The professional condition is their polite way of saying please, not everyone.
Obama inside the bus is good.
go up go down be perceptive be sweary but please please please don't be boring.