latifron: Dpreview, this is too generous rating this om-d for 80%. This camera does not perform well not even comparable to nex 5n and others Frankly, Om-d has good design, speed and built is nice but picutre quality is not GOOD!!.. There is no way for SMALL sensor can beat larger sensor( nex5n, K1, Fuji xpro1, nex7).
I tested this camera, and what i find is bad high iso( usable until iso 800), bad color rendition and iQ; even epl1 has better color rendition.
Prove your points like dpreview did, or no one will take your comment seriously. The fact that you're criticizing a professional review with samples, data, and thoughtful justification, and the only way you're countering it is with your own opinion - that just makes me shake my head...
I've been waiting a long time for this review and it was, as is always the case with dpreview, well worth the wait. Thanks for your thorough work! I am convinced this is my next camera - just need to make sure I pick it up in the US.
I don't really care if it's best in class or whether the sensor is new or the same as some other Panasonic camera. What I care about is that the E-M5 is *significantly* better than my current E-PM1. Its ISO 6400 output even rivals the E-PM1s ISO 1600 images! Plus, it has better dynamic range, higher resolution, and a seemingly very impressive image stabilization system. I'm sold. The E-M5 is no doubt going to be my next camera as soon as I can pick one up!
Get a weekly update of all that's new in the digital
photography world by subscribing to the Digital Photography Review