djst

djst

Lives in Sweden Sweden
Joined on Apr 26, 2010

Comments

Total: 3, showing: 1 – 3
On Just Posted: Olympus OM-D E-M5 review article (577 comments in total)
In reply to:

latifron: Dpreview, this is too generous rating this om-d for 80%. This camera does not perform well not even comparable to nex 5n and others Frankly, Om-d has good design, speed and built is nice but picutre quality is not GOOD!!.. There is no way for SMALL sensor can beat larger sensor( nex5n, K1, Fuji xpro1, nex7).

I tested this camera, and what i find is bad high iso( usable until iso 800), bad color rendition and iQ; even epl1 has better color rendition.

thanks

Prove your points like dpreview did, or no one will take your comment seriously. The fact that you're criticizing a professional review with samples, data, and thoughtful justification, and the only way you're countering it is with your own opinion - that just makes me shake my head...

Direct link | Posted on May 2, 2012 at 09:39 UTC
On Just Posted: Olympus OM-D E-M5 review article (577 comments in total)

I've been waiting a long time for this review and it was, as is always the case with dpreview, well worth the wait. Thanks for your thorough work! I am convinced this is my next camera - just need to make sure I pick it up in the US.

Direct link | Posted on May 2, 2012 at 09:36 UTC as 28th comment
On Just Posted: Olympus OM-D E-M5 test samples article (458 comments in total)

I don't really care if it's best in class or whether the sensor is new or the same as some other Panasonic camera. What I care about is that the E-M5 is *significantly* better than my current E-PM1. Its ISO 6400 output even rivals the E-PM1s ISO 1600 images! Plus, it has better dynamic range, higher resolution, and a seemingly very impressive image stabilization system. I'm sold. The E-M5 is no doubt going to be my next camera as soon as I can pick one up!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2012 at 12:26 UTC as 41st comment | 5 replies
Total: 3, showing: 1 – 3