garyknrd

Lives in Thailand
Works as a Retired
Has a website at www.birdsthatfart.com
Joined on Jan 2, 2011
About me:

Retired. Hobby, bird photography

Comments

Total: 283, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »

Hard to imagine what is going on with Canon.
A very good article by the way. I enjoyed it, and agree.

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2015 at 14:07 UTC as 292nd comment

He looks like a very unhappy camper in this interview. Cheer up Chuck.

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2015 at 10:48 UTC as 16th comment

I haven't bought a Canon product in almost 3 years. I would love to try one of these out. But, I ain't going to buy one.
I agree with others I would buy the 810 instead without a doubt. And I am a Canon shooter.

Link | Posted on Feb 7, 2015 at 01:26 UTC as 22nd comment

If much improved AF I am in. If not I'm out.

Link | Posted on Feb 5, 2015 at 02:18 UTC as 109th comment
On article 3,200 megapixel LSST camera gets construction approval (257 comments in total)

Another fast action camera. For sports and wildlife photographers.
Where is my landscape camera folks..

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2015 at 05:34 UTC as 97th comment
On article 3,200 megapixel LSST camera gets construction approval (257 comments in total)
In reply to:

MXC: need to have good AF, high ISO capability, tons of native lens... and good price

Extremely poor selection of glass. Where is the 50mm 1.8, 35mm lens... I'll personally wait for the official review by DP... :)

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2015 at 05:29 UTC

Wow, they have addressed the main issues with out a doubt. Amazing.
These guys are the 800 lb. gorilla going after the market in a serious way.

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2015 at 02:50 UTC as 12th comment | 3 replies

My mirror less plan is getting one in the next 3 years. LOL.

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2015 at 02:40 UTC as 101st comment
On article Canon EOS 7D Mark II Review (1318 comments in total)
In reply to:

JMDean: 84%? That’s a little high IMO. This camera should rank down in the mid 70’s. Image Quality seems a little high on your scale. The only thing good about this camera is its build quality and performance. You couple in the poor image quality and the Value should go way down.
I purchased this camera and after shooting around 2000 images I can honestly say this is the worse Canon I have ever bought as far as image quality. That includes the Rebels I own. The quality of the images are so bad for the price range, that this will be the first camera I have ever returned. I hope Canon does better on its next release because this one sure left a bad taste in my mouth.
All the poor reviews about image quality are pretty spot on.

Personally I can live with little things that can be fixed by service. Or an eventual software update. But, you cannot fix a crummy sensor with either. On the plus side. If this keeps going on? I will pick up a new one for less than a thousand dollars soon.

Link | Posted on Dec 22, 2014 at 04:30 UTC
On article Nikon D750 Review (1986 comments in total)
In reply to:

garyknrd: What a camera! Insane sensor. If Nikon had the lenses I like to shoot with. I would make a lateral move in a heart beat.

I've got two Canon lightweight primes. Until they redo there 300/2.8 and 500/4. I am stuck with Canon. It is just a matter of time. They have started... the 800mm and 400mm are here. But, not the two lenses I use. All the best,Gary

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2014 at 11:01 UTC
On article Nikon D750 Review (1986 comments in total)

What a camera! Insane sensor. If Nikon had the lenses I like to shoot with. I would make a lateral move in a heart beat.

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2014 at 10:31 UTC as 443rd comment | 3 replies
On article Sony Alpha 77 II firmware update improves AF speed (153 comments in total)

Here is a camera I would love to get my paw's on. To run it threw it's paces....

Link | Posted on Dec 13, 2014 at 02:08 UTC as 36th comment
On article Canon EOS 7D Mark II Review (1318 comments in total)

I use a small and excellent Pentax K-3 for my landscape shots. For the life of me I cannot understand the stalling on the sensor fab? If this camera had a good sensor in it. I would pay the 1,800 bucks without hesitation. It would give me a good all around camera and an excellent sports camera.
Like it is I will just pass.

Link | Posted on Dec 12, 2014 at 12:28 UTC as 225th comment
On article Real-world test: Nikon D750 at the Museum of Flight (281 comments in total)

Very nice, and a big thanks. Reading and researching is just not enough. This real world example really puts it all in place for me.

Link | Posted on Dec 3, 2014 at 03:15 UTC as 81st comment

Awfully close to the 7d. Nice camera, but I still like the 7d, and it does a pretty good job. I think the sports guys will really like this camera. I am going to wait until the next ID and 5D series come out to make up my mind.
Next trip into town I will try one out though... :)

Link | Posted on Dec 2, 2014 at 11:12 UTC as 13th comment
On article Video: Capturing nature with the Canon EOS 7D Mark II (209 comments in total)

It made me realize how much of a scam the pics of wildlife are from so called famous wildlife photographers. Extremely poor IMO. What happened to the thrill of the chase?
But, I am impressed with DPreview. Very informative. Thanks

Link | Posted on Nov 11, 2014 at 04:20 UTC as 93rd comment
On article Canon EOS 7D Mark II: A professional's opinion (502 comments in total)

Kinda the way I felt after shooting the 7D for a year then getting the IV.

Link | Posted on Oct 23, 2014 at 08:20 UTC as 86th comment

Yea, very nice job Panasonic... Great travel camera...

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2014 at 05:03 UTC as 160th comment
In reply to:

garyknrd: I suggest the readers that want the 7D II to read this: http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Photography-Tips/canon-eos-dslr-autofocus-explained.aspx

It explains the AF systems very nicely and is easy to understand.
Marketing and the interviewers are driving this camera to unrealistic expectations. In Canons marketing I understand ( sales ). But for a reviewer to compare it to the 1Dx and then ask Canon? VERY misleading and untrue.

Compare it to the 1Dx...
http://cpn.canon-europe.com/files/education/technical/eos_1d_x_explained/AF_guide_EOS-1DX_eng.pdf

21 - F/2.8 dual cross type, 20 - F/4 cross type.

I will pick one up. But, I will wait until the price is much better.

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2014 at 12:58 UTC

I suggest the readers that want the 7D II to read this: http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Photography-Tips/canon-eos-dslr-autofocus-explained.aspx

It explains the AF systems very nicely and is easy to understand.
Marketing and the interviewers are driving this camera to unrealistic expectations. In Canons marketing I understand ( sales ). But for a reviewer to compare it to the 1Dx and then ask Canon? VERY misleading and untrue.

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2014 at 03:01 UTC as 16th comment | 3 replies
Total: 283, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »