Collett

Collett

Lives in United States CA, United States
Joined on Mar 25, 2010

Comments

Total: 39, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On Harmony of Colours in Nature challenge (2 comments in total)

Lots of very high quality images in this challenge!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 19, 2014 at 01:00 UTC as 1st comment
On sundown all around in the Harmony of Colours in Nature challenge (10 comments in total)

Fantastic!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 19, 2014 at 00:57 UTC as 1st comment
On . in the water fight challenge (6 comments in total)

Very nice! I see you used the 135L, my favorite lens :-).

Direct link | Posted on Aug 10, 2014 at 14:05 UTC as 2nd comment | 1 reply
On Fern Spring Leaf in the One Yellow Leaf challenge (7 comments in total)

Fantastic image!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 5, 2014 at 16:05 UTC as 2nd comment
On Monterey 17 mile drive in the My Best Photo of the Week challenge (1 comment in total)

Also used a Lee Big stopper for the long exposure

Direct link | Posted on Jun 14, 2014 at 17:43 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

Collett: Looks like a sweet walk around combo. Significantly lighter than my 5dIII plus 50L.

Because the Zeiss will likely be as good (and perhaps better) as the 50L at F1.8, while the Canon 50F1.8 is not and is not even close. I am thinking any new Canon 50F1.8 is going to weigh significantly more than the nifty fifty, have better IQ but doubtful it will be as good as this Zeiss, and have a price tag closer to the Zeiss. Also, Canon does not have a FF body that comes close to the weight of the Sony - nor one that is 36mp. Add the saving in weight of the body AND the lens - and it is significant.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 3, 2014 at 20:34 UTC

Looks like a sweet walk around combo. Significantly lighter than my 5dIII plus 50L.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 3, 2014 at 18:36 UTC as 15th comment | 5 replies
On 20140105_1085 photo in Collett's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Hyw 1 Big Sur

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 06:16 UTC as 1st comment
On 20140105_1052 200dpi photo in Collett's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Hyw 1 Big Sur

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 06:16 UTC as 1st comment
On 20140105_1147 photo in Collett's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Hyw 1 Big Sur

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 06:16 UTC as 1st comment
On 20140105_1138 photo in Collett's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

Hyw 1 Big Sur

Direct link | Posted on Jan 6, 2014 at 06:15 UTC as 1st comment
On Timeless Splendor in the City of Rome – Italy II challenge (4 comments in total)

Very nice!

Direct link | Posted on Dec 11, 2013 at 18:20 UTC as 1st comment
On Golden Harvest in the Prairie Harvest challenge (8 comments in total)

Very nice capture!

Direct link | Posted on Oct 21, 2013 at 18:08 UTC as 6th comment
On Underwater challenge (7 comments in total)
In reply to:

HGFGKM: Are photos from aquaria allowed in this challenge?

Wondering the same thing.

Direct link | Posted on May 9, 2013 at 20:36 UTC
On The hand of the climber in the F1.4 challenge (1 comment in total)

Very nice!

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2013 at 01:16 UTC as 1st comment
On Canon EOS 100D/Rebel SL1 Hands-on Preview preview (355 comments in total)

Looks interesting to me - as a complement to my other Canon DLSR's. This form factor will be sweet when coupled with a 24-28mm pancake lens. Too many issues with Canon's mirrorless, especially w/r/t focus. The size and weight is small enough to keep many Canon DSL shooters from trying 4/3's, Sony Nex, Oly, Fuji - etc. as a supplement to their DLSR. Why not have the functionality of a DLSR, small size, and the ability to swithch lenses with your other Canon bodies compaired to the alternatives? I have an older Rebel that my wife uses and I use when I want to travel light, and this or its successor will likely be that camera body's successor - if they don't come up with a FF version of the same (understadably a bit larger) :-)

Direct link | Posted on Mar 21, 2013 at 13:47 UTC as 101st comment | 1 reply
On Feet challenge (18 comments in total)
In reply to:

Collett: THIS CHALLENGE SHOULD BE THROWN OUT. INCONSISTENT AND ABRITRARY RULES HAVE BEEN APPLIED.

No - you made the comment that they would be allowed and left many entries alone that were clearly not the photographers POV - and relying upon that I entered the challenge (only one entry). Then my entry got disqualified andthe others were still in at that point. It appears you dumped the others in an attempt to be consistent. Look - the problem is you changing the rules as you go alongbecause you were not so clear initially. If you change your rules - you should err on the side of being overly inclusive and letting the voters decide as was you INITIAL decision. However, these discussions would have likely been spoilers for entrys such as mine with the poll vaulters feet anyways regardless of what the initial rules said.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2013 at 20:24 UTC
On Feet challenge (18 comments in total)
In reply to:

Collett: THIS CHALLENGE SHOULD BE THROWN OUT. INCONSISTENT AND ABRITRARY RULES HAVE BEEN APPLIED.

See your statement below "I just cancelled the disquallification on this photo and a couple others. On reassessment I decided that technically it meets the criteria of it being your feet with a background and I will leave it up to the voters to decide how fantastic it is." You did not cancel the others when I made the statement and instead you changed your mind again in stating that you disqualified all of these - hence the term abritrary at the time I made the post.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2013 at 17:32 UTC
On Feet challenge (18 comments in total)

THIS CHALLENGE SHOULD BE THROWN OUT. INCONSISTENT AND ABRITRARY RULES HAVE BEEN APPLIED.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2013 at 02:50 UTC as 2nd comment | 5 replies

Very nice!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 18, 2013 at 01:59 UTC as 5th comment
Total: 39, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »