jeerzz

sportyaccordy: That is like eye-wateringly expensive.

Sensors are priced exponentially based on area though due to the odds of defects increasing w/sensor area, so hopefully an FX sized equivalent would only cost $2K or so. Personally I would still rather have a bare-bones FX cam w/the form factor of an old SLR but a legacy mount for <$1000.

MM1: Hasselnex?

Tee1up: Seems like a nice set of specs but I rally hate touch-screens on cameras.

nawknai: That's the worst "con" list I've ever seen on DPReview.

Just say the camera is incredible and leave it at that.

topstuff: LOVE the red color !!

Whats with the negativity about the red version?

Hint to armchair camera gear nerds - using a black camera with a massive lens does not mean that people will look at you and think you look cool. Even if you had a 1dx and massive white zoom , you still don't look cool.

Pretending to be a pro? Secretly hope people seeing you may think you are a pro?

People still don't think you look cool.

Red ( or any coloured cameras ) are cool. They are cool because it means you don't care about looking serious. They are cool because some subjects tend to take you less seriously and this is useful when travelling.

The guy with the black cameras, photo vest, big bag, fast zooms. He will never be cool. I include myself in this category.

We should just face the facts. Looking like a serious photo freak is not cool.
For this reason alone, coloured cameras are cool because you are telling the world that you don't care and you are just having fun.

ingram98ab: Nobody seems surprised that Daniel Craig appeared in the samples... is he a regular in DPreview's Hands-on reviews??? Or photographers just dont care??