crsantin

Lives in Canada Canada
Works as a Teacher
Joined on Nov 1, 2006

Comments

Total: 38, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

PPierre: And no affordable lens to go with it... Well done Sony !

PS: Releasing 3 FF lenses with this camera is either a proof that Sony needs to rethink its marketing department hiring policy, or an insanely rude way to tell Nex users that Sony doesn't care about Aps-c lenses anymore.

Exactly. When was the last time Sony released a NEX lens? How about any lens that was less than 1k?

Link | Posted on Feb 3, 2016 at 21:41 UTC
On article The travel photography of HDR guru Trey Ratcliff (235 comments in total)

That first image is nice. The rest of them are nauseating. Not a fan.

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2015 at 14:49 UTC as 94th comment
On article #1 in France: Hands-on with DxO ONE (278 comments in total)

Looks incredibly awkward and a real pain in the backside to actually use. No thanks.

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2015 at 14:35 UTC as 143rd comment
On article Meta35 pulls metadata from film cameras (38 comments in total)

I still shoot with my F100 so this is very nice. Definitely picking one up in the very near future.

Link | Posted on Jun 15, 2015 at 22:39 UTC as 15th comment
On article Field Test: Sigma 19mm, 30mm and 60mm F2.8 DN lenses (167 comments in total)

The Sigma 60mm is my portrait lens for my Sony Nex 6. It delivers wonderful results. I also have the 19mm and while I do not use that focal length often, it too is a very good lens. I'll purchase the 30mm next. This 3 lens set-up is very familiar to me as my Contax G1 and 28mm, 45mm, and 90mm are very close in aperture and FL to the Sigma set (yes I still shoot film). Why no Nikon mount?

Link | Posted on May 9, 2015 at 00:34 UTC as 51st comment | 2 replies

Let's see what they mean by competitive and accessible. It looks like a Samsung mated with a Leica. I'm curious.

Link | Posted on Feb 24, 2015 at 22:43 UTC as 110th comment
On article Opinion: The myth of the upgrade path (1595 comments in total)

A sensible and logical outlook and very contrary to a lot of the nonsense that gets posted in the forums on this very website. A much needed reminder for many who visit here.

Link | Posted on Jan 8, 2015 at 20:51 UTC as 402nd comment

Quiet and simple, the equipment isn't that important. That might be the only sensible thing I've ever read on this site. I really need to see the rest of the images to have an informed opinion, some of these are nice but others seem very random and off-topic.

Link | Posted on Sep 27, 2014 at 17:00 UTC as 17th comment

More affordable e mount lenses please. The Zeiss options are nice but I can't afford them.

Link | Posted on Sep 24, 2014 at 13:20 UTC as 48th comment
On article Hands-on with Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX100 (442 comments in total)

I just found my next digital camera. Time to unload some older gear and raise some funds.

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2014 at 02:35 UTC as 62nd comment

I'm glad they are making the MA. I can't afford one but if I could I would buy one. I still shoot film, 35mm and 120mm. Digital is nice, film is still special to me. I will own a M2 or M3 one day, the prices have come down to affordable levels.

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2014 at 23:18 UTC as 19th comment | 2 replies

Hopper did some very good work with a camera, glad his stuff is getting some recognition.

Link | Posted on Jun 24, 2014 at 22:12 UTC as 14th comment
On article Leica T (Typ 701) First Impressions Review (2257 comments in total)

Looks like a shiny Samsung NX300. Almost 2k for an APS-C sensor? No thanks. There are much much better buys out there.

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2014 at 23:00 UTC as 426th comment | 2 replies
On article Mockups emerge of new Olympus OM-D 'OM-G' (333 comments in total)

The ground glass focusing screen is what tipped it off, otherwise I would have believed this. I would buy this camera btw if it were real.

Link | Posted on Apr 1, 2014 at 22:45 UTC as 95th comment | 3 replies
On article Am I missing something here? (627 comments in total)
In reply to:

NCB: What will make or break this camera is the pic quality. Period. And as yet nobody knows what that is. 1" isn't a tiny sensor; a "premium" compact would be considered brilliant with this sized sensor. And this is a rather special sensor. So, let's see how it actually does in real world shooting.

I'm surprised that this article has actually appeared when it has. It's somewhat pre-empting a serious review.

No I think it will be price and price alone. Image quality and performance will be quite good, but at +1k this camera makes absolutely no sense. I honestly can't see Nikon selling very many of these. The original V1 and soon to be slashed V2 will offer good value I think. I'll probably wait to see the V2 prices come down then I could see myself getting into this sysem.

Link | Posted on Mar 16, 2014 at 20:38 UTC

I used to be a DX shooter for many years but left this year for mirrorless and won't be going back. I got really tired of Nikon offering up the same camera time after time, no new DX lenses, especially primes, and the recent push they've been giving customers to move to full frame. I grew tired of it and it is time to move on. So many interesting and truly excellent cameras to explore.

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2014 at 13:17 UTC as 63rd comment | 1 reply
On article Have Your Say: Best Lens of 2013 (88 comments in total)
In reply to:

Theelderkeynes: You missed the bargain of the decade - the Sigma 60mm F2.8 A very sharp very well built but nice and light portrait/short telehoto and all for £129 or say $200. It cannot bre beaten, anywhere.

Agreed, it is a special lens. Just dynamite on my Nex 6.

Link | Posted on Dec 19, 2013 at 22:54 UTC
On article Niki Feijen's haunting images of abandoned houses (218 comments in total)
In reply to:

crsantin: Is he is trespassing to get these photos? That concerns me more than anything. Did he get permission from the property owners to publish these images? I wouldn't want someone trespassing on my property to take pictures. It doesn't matter if I'm living there or not.

I can abandon my house but still own it. That doesn't give you the right to walk onto my property and start taking pictures. My point is, someone must own these properties...someone's estate, the government, whatever. Abandoned doesn't mean trespassing laws don't apply...not where I'm from.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2013 at 18:20 UTC
On article Niki Feijen's haunting images of abandoned houses (218 comments in total)

Is he is trespassing to get these photos? That concerns me more than anything. Did he get permission from the property owners to publish these images? I wouldn't want someone trespassing on my property to take pictures. It doesn't matter if I'm living there or not.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2013 at 14:37 UTC as 89th comment | 3 replies
On article Nikon video hints at long-desired 'digital FM' (551 comments in total)

This is probably the digital camera I've been waiting for since, well, the beginning of digital cameras, but it is way out of my budget. Too bad they don't offer a version of this that regular people can afford. I would buy one immediately.

Link | Posted on Oct 25, 2013 at 19:26 UTC as 215th comment
Total: 38, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »