atulag: I had RX 100. I was highly disappointed and wonder why so much hype about it. I had problems with focussing and exposure. I got rid of it .
Mark I is fantastic. But must be made in Japan. To see some photos I taken with my RX100, please visit:
To see the original full size you'd better log in.
After chequed the samples of M3 and could not understand why they are so moderate .
I quit happy with my rx100 (made in Japan). with no problems of focussing and exposure. The color of the pictures are very impressing especially in the low light condition.
You will be luckily enough finding that this is the only fault.
Thanks Robert. That makes sense.
Yes MK2 have more features than the original RX-100. But wonder why it is so expensive for a camera made in China?
utomo99: If it can produce good images, with $ 399 price I believe many people will buy this cameras. Now Panasonic must make sure that the images is good. and no other big problems.Good luck
41MP Nokia 808 has 1/1.2'' sensor (almost as big as the RX100's) and a great Carl Zeiss lens.
With the smallest 1/2.3 sensor, you can not expect the images is good.
Why the IQ of this RX100 II Samples is much worse then the previous RX100's ?Wonder what the Canon G2X will be.
Thank you for your advise.
I have few lenses for my old Oly OM film camera. I wonder if they can be use on the new Olympus OM-D E-M5 ?