Gazeomon

Gazeomon

Joined on Oct 8, 2010

Comments

Total: 58, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (586 comments in total)
In reply to:

beavertown: 1200 bucks for this IQ?

Why don't they just put a smartphone sensor in it?

@ Badi. Enjoyable piece of gear with that image quality? FOR THAT PRICE? What are You inhaling?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 16, 2014 at 06:08 UTC
On Nikon 1 V3 First Impressions Review preview (432 comments in total)

Judging by DPR's sample photos, I find the image quality rather poor for such an expensive little camera. They are soft with not much detail. I'd rather spend just that little bit more for a better system (Fuji, Olympus, Sony, Panasonic).

Direct link | Posted on Jun 30, 2014 at 23:37 UTC as 103rd comment
On Street photography tips with Zack Arias article (149 comments in total)

Enjoyed this video. I like his work and the way he works his street photography. Don't care what camera he shoots with. Could have been done with almost any camera.

Direct link | Posted on May 24, 2014 at 23:43 UTC as 37th comment
On Fujifilm X-T1 Review preview (564 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ijuf Nonac: This is an excellent camera for everybody who want trees to look like some funny computer generated things (or maybe a painting?).

Take a look at this image.....
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilm-x-t1/samples/lmo/DSCF3822.jpg

It certanly looks like a 'beautiful' painting and not something comming from a brand new camera. When this image is viewed at 100%, everything becomes a complete mess!!

@MJJ Sevilla. In order to enjoy the XT1 I have to buy another converter and radically change my workflow? Thanks, I'd rather stick with what I've got right now ( Pentax K3 & Lightroom ).

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2014 at 04:25 UTC
On Fujifilm X-T1 Review preview (564 comments in total)
In reply to:

Maverick2007: Perfect Water color effect!

https://www.flickr.com/photos/thegoosenoir/13276200455

Also Bonus is you can get Nice shadow too !!!!! Very impressed by post processing by Fuji! Wait a sec, there should have been button to add additional artifacts with one click of button like sweat or artificial rain etc? Hows that Fuji?

@Badi. Does one really have to subscribe Adobe Photoshop in order to get properly sharpened photos out of the XT1? I get pin sharp foliage out of my Pentax K3 in Lightroom 5.4 without a problem, and the K3 is not much larger than the XT1, especially with the Ltd. primes. Shooting RAW only!

Direct link | Posted on May 6, 2014 at 04:11 UTC
On Pentax K-3 Review preview (498 comments in total)
In reply to:

Josh Bailey: not the most attractive looking camera out there is it haha

@ Josh Bailey. But it takes pictures, har har

Direct link | Posted on Apr 28, 2014 at 00:07 UTC
On Updated: Creating the Leica T article (197 comments in total)
In reply to:

G1Houston: If you guys remember that the Apple head designer John Ivy designed a Leica for charity auction. It seems that his design must influence Leica's in a much broader way. This Leica not only shares Apple's aesthetics but its UIF of less is more. This is one nice and clean modern looking cameras with a great UIF. All other camera makers, please take note!

George W. Bush tried to break it.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 25, 2014 at 08:24 UTC
On Nikon D3300 Review preview (232 comments in total)
In reply to:

Gazeomon: I think there are more exciting 'entry level' cameras available than this lame plastic 'iteration of an iteration'. Look @ Fuji, Sony, Olympus, Panasonic, Samsung and Pentax.

Yes, I can see a lot of soccer mums hiring 80 to 4oo mm semi pro zooms for their 24mp entry level cams with that superb AF system to print super size piccies of their ball kicking kids chasing birds. Yeah, totally forgot that aspect of entry level photography.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 22, 2014 at 11:27 UTC
On Nikon D3300 Review preview (232 comments in total)

I think there are more exciting 'entry level' cameras available than this lame plastic 'iteration of an iteration'. Look @ Fuji, Sony, Olympus, Panasonic, Samsung and Pentax.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 22, 2014 at 00:59 UTC as 45th comment | 9 replies
On Hands on with the Pentax 645Z article (647 comments in total)
In reply to:

DonFenix: Dear DPR, I appreciated you finally completed the K-3 review. Can I humbly request you do review the 645z? Best regards!

If they would, I probably would not live long enough to know their findings.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 19, 2014 at 05:32 UTC
On Hands on with the Pentax 645Z article (647 comments in total)
In reply to:

Calvin Chann: Full review please.

Has DPREVIEW the 'experts' to competently review such a camera?

Direct link | Posted on Apr 19, 2014 at 05:19 UTC
On Pentax K-3 Review preview (498 comments in total)
In reply to:

wisep01: Some people here have the gall to assert that the D7100, the camera that single-handedly rewrote the dictionary definition of "pathetic," is in the same league as the K-3. As a Nikon user, trust me, it most certainly is not!

K-3 continuous shooting: 8.3 fps; buffer size: 23 shots
D7100 continuous shooting: 5.9fps; buffer size: 6 shots (yes, I double-checked)

And that's just one of the many areas where the D7100 falls so very short.

Keep whining bright spark. It's getting a bit dull.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 12, 2014 at 03:34 UTC
On Pentax K-3 Review preview (498 comments in total)
In reply to:

wisep01: Some people here have the gall to assert that the D7100, the camera that single-handedly rewrote the dictionary definition of "pathetic," is in the same league as the K-3. As a Nikon user, trust me, it most certainly is not!

K-3 continuous shooting: 8.3 fps; buffer size: 23 shots
D7100 continuous shooting: 5.9fps; buffer size: 6 shots (yes, I double-checked)

And that's just one of the many areas where the D7100 falls so very short.

@ hydrospanner. I think I have a pretty good idea what I am talking about. I was talking about the SIZE of the K3 not the WEIGHT. 70 grams don't bother me but SIZE is important to me. And PLEASE stop whining about alleged whiners. People make critical comments here. You are the whiner.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 11, 2014 at 20:58 UTC
On Pentax K-3 Review preview (498 comments in total)
In reply to:

wisep01: Some people here have the gall to assert that the D7100, the camera that single-handedly rewrote the dictionary definition of "pathetic," is in the same league as the K-3. As a Nikon user, trust me, it most certainly is not!

K-3 continuous shooting: 8.3 fps; buffer size: 23 shots
D7100 continuous shooting: 5.9fps; buffer size: 6 shots (yes, I double-checked)

And that's just one of the many areas where the D7100 falls so very short.

@ hydrospanner. The K3 body size is quite a bit smaller than the D7100. Better check facts before hitting the post button. I'll never go back to Nikon's clump gear.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 11, 2014 at 05:34 UTC
On Pentax K-3 Review preview (498 comments in total)
In reply to:

wisep01: Some people here have the gall to assert that the D7100, the camera that single-handedly rewrote the dictionary definition of "pathetic," is in the same league as the K-3. As a Nikon user, trust me, it most certainly is not!

K-3 continuous shooting: 8.3 fps; buffer size: 23 shots
D7100 continuous shooting: 5.9fps; buffer size: 6 shots (yes, I double-checked)

And that's just one of the many areas where the D7100 falls so very short.

My Nikon D300s paired with the Sigma 70mm macro 2.8 looks and feels monstrous compared to my K3 with the 100mm macro or even worse with the 70mm Ltd. 2.4, let alone image quality. Nikon has nothing like it that even remotely compares.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 11, 2014 at 00:52 UTC
On Pentax K-3 Review preview (498 comments in total)
In reply to:

halai: Not that I care about the score...but don't you think the K-3 should have a higher score than 83 DPR? :-)
- No oil spots
- No light leak
- Has video
- Very very good raw file

Isn't this what we want for our photography???

- No gas leaks - and feels very good in my hands with all the hard buttons in the right place. The RAW's are excellent and with the 'Limited' line of lenses it's a great system for travel and street photography.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 10, 2014 at 22:15 UTC
On Pentax K-3 preview (961 comments in total)
In reply to:

Joe Ogiba: The Nikon D7100 received an 85% Gold award so I wonder what the K-3 will get, hmm. Heck the D600 with all it's problems received an 87% Gold award.

Is it really that important what kind of approval number somebody sticks on a camera?

Direct link | Posted on Mar 27, 2014 at 05:12 UTC
On Pentax K-3 preview (961 comments in total)
In reply to:

LSPhotography: The K-3 rocks. It nails focus virtually every time, (unlike the K-5) and the image quality/files are fantastic. Images really seem to "breathe" and have fantastic depth, they can look very 3d. I have had mine for 5 months and use it every day. I'm still as excited to use it as when I first got it. The only thing it is missing (in my case) is more limited lenses : )

If you don't own one and have been waiting for a review here before you have bought one, you've missed out on a lot of shots that you could have taken with it!

Could not agree more. I would have lost more than 4 month of shooting with this great camera if I would have waited for a DPREVIEW assessment. Thankfully there are quite a few other sites and hands on videos on Youtube to get a pretty good idea what this camera is capable of.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 27, 2014 at 04:51 UTC
On Pentax K-3 preview (961 comments in total)
In reply to:

oselimg: We would like unpacking of certain brands' cameras which is more exciting and in line with current voyeuristic trends than a hasty publication of a serious camera. As excitement will ware off Dpreview should consider exposing private lives of certain brands' engineers.

The stuff You are smoking does not do You any good - - - I think.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 26, 2014 at 12:03 UTC
On Review: Ona Lima camera strap article (142 comments in total)

A camera strap review! Wow! Got nothing more urgent on Your plate??

Direct link | Posted on Mar 25, 2014 at 07:33 UTC as 66th comment | 1 reply
Total: 58, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous123Next ›Last »