steveh0607

steveh0607

Lives in United States CT, United States
Has a website at stephenharrisphotos.com
Joined on Mar 16, 2011

Comments

Total: 81, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Little beauty: Nordin Seruyan's macro images article (352 comments in total)
In reply to:

MisterBG: Several of them have a very distracting background.

I saw it as a total piece. My eye moved around the frame taking it all in. I found it refreshing, but each his/her own.

Direct link | Posted on May 10, 2014 at 11:32 UTC
On A travel-sized large-format 4x5 camera? article (219 comments in total)

At last, a true full frame camera! Now we don't have to suffer the poor depth of field the 35mm offers.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 22, 2014 at 16:35 UTC as 26th comment | 3 replies
On Fujifilm X-T1 Review preview (592 comments in total)
In reply to:

J2Gphoto: This Fuji got my attention and I was giving it serious thought. Like I posted before I like the Olympus lens line up better. But now after reading Steve Huff's review of it and seeing the SOOC JPEG's and several other things he said the E-M1 does much better I am now convinced the E-M1 will be my next system. I'd advise anyone considering this camera to read Steve's review. He never pulls punches and gives honest real world use reviews.

But what do you really think? Try to be nice.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 19, 2014 at 13:30 UTC
On Photographing bubbles, one bubble at a time article (76 comments in total)

Wow! what beautiful abstracts. Thank you for posting this.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 29, 2014 at 12:04 UTC as 43rd comment
On Apple applies for dual-sensor camera patent post (71 comments in total)
In reply to:

Scottelly: Before long they'll have multi-sensor cameras with one color captured from each. STOOOOOOOPIIIIIIID! WTF do they think a regular Bayer pattern sensor is?!? A 20 megapixel camera with a Bayer pattern sensor is basically a 3 color module with 5 million red sensors, 5 million blue sensors, and 10 million green sensors!

This dual sensor stuff would make more sense if they were planning to include 3D for better face recognition or something.

But the colored filters are placed on top of the sensor. Having two sensors, one for color, one for luminance should produce a cleaner image and so is a good idea for phones which generally look crummy at any reasonable size.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 26, 2014 at 17:29 UTC
On Kodak reborn: A look at JK Imaging's 2014 lineup article (195 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marty4650: I think we should remember that the Kodak "legacy" isn't for making high end cameras.

Their legacy was always "cameras for the masses" like the Brownies, 126 and 110 Instamatics, Disc cameras, etc. While they did occasional produce a high end camera, their main goal was make photography easy and affordable. So these Kodak branded cheapies might fit right in.

These are probably aimed at emerging third world markets.

that's true Higuel. Kodak invented the Bayer sensor and should have owned the digital camera market but the company was to lazy or whatever to capitalize on what they invented.

Then they sold off the sensor division!? Kokak is the poster child for how not to take advantage of your own invention.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 22, 2014 at 12:05 UTC
On Am I missing something here? article (637 comments in total)
In reply to:

peevee1: "But then again, this is a model with an optional viewfinder so that people who don't want a viewfinder don't have to pay for it, that Nikon US plans only to sell in bundles with the viewfinder. At which point, I'm beginning to wonder whether any of this makes sense."

Here is the sense for you. Markets are different. Asia likes their small, viewfinderless form factor. They got it. US likes their bigger, DSLR-like form factor. We got it too (with EVF and grip on). And Nikon saved a bunch of money in fixed costs designing and preparing for mass production only 1 model of this class instead of 2 (unlike, say, Olympus with both E-P5 which does not sell well in the US and E-M10 which should sell better). And then they saved fixed costs in the low-volume (for mirrorless) US again shipping (and of course marketing etc) only one kit instead of several different kits. And for low volumes fixed costs is all that matters.

Nikon bundled the camera with the grip and EVF and priced it accordingly. That's why it costs $1,200.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 15, 2014 at 12:18 UTC
On Am I missing something here? article (637 comments in total)

This camera is loaded with great technology. If Nikon joined the 4/3 group they would own that market. The 1 strategy doesn't make sense to me.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 13, 2014 at 12:34 UTC as 172nd comment | 5 replies
On Nikon Df Review preview (1618 comments in total)

I noticed this camera was only given a numeric score. No "gold" or "silver" designation. Why?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 21, 2013 at 12:54 UTC as 165th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

Dolan Halbrook: It seems to have been mostly missed but this update adds camera profiles for pretty much all Olympus m43 bodies, the E-5, and XZ series. Great news for Oly shooters.

Lightroom doesn't have lens profiles for Olympus.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 12, 2013 at 22:27 UTC
On Retro Nikon 'DF' emerges from the shadows article (1396 comments in total)
In reply to:

Donnie G: My guess is that this camera will be a bare bones, entry level, full framer that will replace the APS-C D300 series in the Nikon lineup. Having some type of hybrid ovf/evf switchable viewfinder and support for full compatibility with all of Nikon's legacy dslr glass along with completely analog controls will be the camera's defining feature set. I'm also guessing that this camera will be priced at around USD $1800, just like the D300 series was. To me, that would be the move that would make the most sense within the Nikon marketing scheme. :)

I'm in Donnie's camp. It seems to be a niche camera and the leaked specs seem to put it below the 610. If priced right, somewhere between $1,400 - $1,800 it should sell well.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 3, 2013 at 16:08 UTC
In reply to:

Cheezr: Here is my test. I took an image at ISO 12800 in decent light and converted it in Adobe Camera Raw CC, Aperture (latest), DxO8 and DxO9. Below are the links to the dropbox files, enjoy.
PS in both DxO I used default but smart lighting to medium and luminance to 15
Aperture was apple defaults and ACR adobe defaults

ACR https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/31373150/K5211836PS.JPG
Aperture https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/31373150/K5211836Aper.jpg
DxO8 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/31373150/K5211836_DxO8.jpg
DxO9 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/31373150/K5211836_DxO9.jpg

Original DNG (Pentax K5IIs) https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/31373150/K5211836.DNG

also btw, DxO8 took 11 seconds to export and DxO9 took 2 minutes 7 seconds (both as reported by the software). Both on a Mac Mini i7 w/8GB ram and SSD

I compared DXO Prime against NIK DeFine 2.0. I found no real difference except that NIK was much, much faster.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 27, 2013 at 18:54 UTC
In reply to:

photonius: Well, despite the advantages of dSLR, a nice print on good quality film paper should last a long time. In that time you have to keep buying new technology every few years and copy your stuff again and again if you want to save it into the future. Hopefully some new stable technology will come along. I thought CDs and DVDs would last, but seems they don't. (hard drives fail of course routinely).

A quality inkjet print can last well over 100 years framed, even longer in storage.

Nevertheless, it's good to see film surviving for those who prefer to use it.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 2, 2013 at 12:13 UTC
In reply to:

(unknown member): Awesome post but all three of those photographs shown, and every other one on the photographer's site under "Storms," is of American extreme weather, not Canadian, Mexican, Nicaraguan, or any other country on the continent. Since that is the case why are you mentioning the continent??

Sorry, but the increasingly common habit of referring to the continent every time something America specific is mentioned is getting very old, and annoying. People that write for a living should not be making such obvious mistakes.

The name of the country is The United States of America. So saying America is shorthand for USA.

No one would think the word America refers to El Salvador.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 2, 2013 at 12:07 UTC
In reply to:

attomole: anyone using this for fuji Xtrans? what are your experiences ?

Iridient is best at processing Trans-X files.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 24, 2013 at 12:01 UTC

This kid has great imagination! Keep at it and have fun!

Direct link | Posted on Jul 13, 2013 at 12:10 UTC as 50th comment
On Best DSLRs and ILCs for less than $1000 article (276 comments in total)
In reply to:

dougjgreen1: My main issue with this list is that right now, the Panasonic Lumix G5 is a better deal than the G6, because its available for roughly half the price, and it's around 90% the same camera.

But I get the fact that it's politically incorrect on a gear site like this to recommend a camera that's on end of life clearance over the model that is replacing it.

Just because the D7000 has been replaced doesn't make it a worthless camera. It's an excellent camera.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 29, 2013 at 11:40 UTC
On Best DSLRs and ILCs for less than $1000 article (276 comments in total)
In reply to:

Valterj: In this list many good cameras are not included: Sony NEX-5R, Samsung cameras, ...

In the title : "Best DSLRs and ILCs for less than $1000"

Why did you include Olympus OM-D E-M5: $1299 with 12-50mm kit lens

And Fuji cameras like Fujifilm X-E1 16.3MP $799.00 are not included in this list...

The OM-D is under $1,000 now.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 29, 2013 at 11:37 UTC

Orange and yellow?? Yikes!

The garish color aside I wonder why Pentax hasn't crashed the mirrorless party in a big way? The company used to be forward thinking, but now it seems they only offer pretty much more of the same (except for the bizarre colors).

Direct link | Posted on Jun 15, 2013 at 12:18 UTC as 14th comment

What he does is actually a traffic safety hazard. Other drivers could be temporarily blinded by the light and hit something or someone. This guy needs to rethink what he's doing.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 14, 2013 at 16:35 UTC as 32nd comment | 1 reply
Total: 81, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »