Lives in United Kingdom United Kingdom
Works as a IT Consultant
Has a website at
Joined on Jun 27, 2011
About me:

Nikon > D7100, D800, D5100
Canon > Canon Eos M
Sony > A3000
Panasonic > GH3

To Buy > Sony A7R, Canon 17-40, Metabones Canon EF Adapter.


Total: 84, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Nikon D810 Preview preview (1094 comments in total)

Looks good enhancement but still don't get Nikon reason on why not putting 1 X XQD Card to accompany the SDXC card slot, to have a larger user take up of XQD Cards and as a natural progression for users who would like to add / move up to their Full Pro Cameras D4/s +

Direct link | Posted on Jul 9, 2014 at 22:09 UTC as 75th comment
On Nikon D810 Preview preview (1094 comments in total)
In reply to:

larrytusaz: Why does anybody care about the video specifications of this high-grade stills camera? If I had $3000 to drop on this I'd do so for the amazing pictures it can take, not the Vimeo or YouTube clips it can record. It's an SLR, not a camcorder.

Not now it all changed when Nikon introduce the D90 - DSLR's are now both still cameras and camcorders - which is good as you only need one device. Wished Nikon did the D8100 with 4K as 1080p is all hat now and 4k is taking over now.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 21:07 UTC
On Nikon D810 Preview preview (1094 comments in total)
In reply to:

InTheMist: What full-frame cameras natively record 4K video?

Canon 1d C.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 26, 2014 at 21:00 UTC

Looks like a great camera and a good price 2.

Direct link | Posted on May 1, 2014 at 10:41 UTC as 25th comment
On Apple is on camera-engineer hiring spree post (87 comments in total)

They should do a joint venture like joining up with Nikon = sell for both company...

Direct link | Posted on Mar 14, 2014 at 14:12 UTC as 19th comment | 6 replies
On Sony Alpha 7 Review preview (1600 comments in total)

I like it - why no gold award ?

Direct link | Posted on Jan 23, 2014 at 22:51 UTC as 173rd comment | 1 reply
On DPReview Gear of the Year - Part 1: Fujifilm X100S article (307 comments in total)

Good write up- how come you haven't review excellent Nikon D4 or the excellent Canon 1d MK X|

Direct link | Posted on Nov 12, 2013 at 10:50 UTC as 55th comment | 8 replies
On Nikon D610 preview (634 comments in total)
In reply to:

57even: Would be interested to be a fly on the wall at the product planning office in Japan. Lots of red faced apologies no doubt, but I suspect the issue was with one of their component suppliers, since it all seems to narrow down to the shutter itself.

But if anyone is thinking of actually getting a D610 it should be a very nice camera with very few issues and at current prices it's a bargain. I really liked mine, even though I did exchange it for a D800. The latter is objectively better, but I doubt you'd notice 90% of the time.

If you wait a few months price should go down to be as the Canon 6D.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 8, 2013 at 14:42 UTC
In reply to:

Abhijith Kannankavil: i don think nikon is going into making phones, unless they pair up with some phone makers. if they do it alone, it's almost sure to be a market failure.

Agree should team up with HTC, Google Android, Nokia - Windows Phone company.

Also be more open with JVC and RED in the Pro / Semi pro video and bring out their own D4 C 4K Video camera.

Also be wary of what Sony is doing and try to bring their own models into play. Example RX1, Rx100, VG10 and Mirrorless F Mount DSLR style cameras also.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 10, 2013 at 10:22 UTC

Looks good - reported fast AF via Live-view and video as you expect from a company that has camcorder presence. Also improved AF like 7d and Wi-fi (free), wished they built in GPS rather charging extra.

Looks like a good camera - hopefully the Sensor is improved - however still like the images I get from my Nikon's...

Direct link | Posted on Jul 2, 2013 at 18:00 UTC as 34th comment
On Sony unleashes Cyber-shot RX100 II with BSI CMOS sensor article (174 comments in total)

Looks good... where's Canon and Nikon equivalents of RX-1 & RX-100 ?

Direct link | Posted on Jun 27, 2013 at 08:24 UTC as 33rd comment | 4 replies

Looks like a great flash and also caters for when shooting Video shooting and quite a good price.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 27, 2013 at 08:18 UTC as 17th comment

I want one and expect Nikon to update their lens improving optics; flare and offer the same 1.4 in-built TC but charge more than Canon version.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 25, 2013 at 19:18 UTC as 32nd comment

Nice feature set; Wi-fi, large screen, 20mp - however wasn't 2 keen on the Image quality when I tried it out with the NX 100. I stick with my Nikon's....

Direct link | Posted on Jun 20, 2013 at 19:25 UTC as 74th comment | 4 replies

Looks like good cameras; dig the colors, good resolution at 16mp, competitively price and some good lenses.

Only wish was that they included 1 D-LI109 battery with the camera and you may need quite few sets of 4xAA batteries and higher capacity ones to have decent battery life and the battery compartment could get a tad warm as well.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 13, 2013 at 11:35 UTC as 24th comment | 3 replies
On Nikon UK offers summer cashback on 1 system cameras article (50 comments in total)

Good thing for nikon to offer but one difference to Canon's Cashback which is done via Bacs to your bank via credit to your Card or cheque you get a pre-paid card to value of cashback you use for future purchases in the future.

Direct link | Posted on May 31, 2013 at 15:47 UTC as 13th comment
On Just posted: Nikon D5200 in-depth review article (233 comments in total)

Good review ; but can you give ABP / estimate if you're planning to do review of the Canon 1D-x & Nikon D4, some of us may want to upgrade to these cameras from a DX model like a D300s, 7D, etc and would like to review how good / bad these cameras are.

Direct link | Posted on May 17, 2013 at 08:49 UTC as 26th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Scott Wilson: Canon must be smoking crack. I mean really 11K for a 200-400 F4 lens even with a built in 1.4x extender is crazy. You can buy a 200-400 for a lot less and just put on a much cheaper 1.4x extender when you need it.

Come on are we getting so lazy that we can't do this ourselves. Plus if we keep bowing to the big camera companies and paying crazy money for all of these new lens they will just keep going up and up.

A lens is not a car and they don't cost anywhere nears as much to manufacture. Nikon fell and hit their heads when they increased the 200-400 they make and charged almost 2K more for adding VRII. Heck there was nothing wrong with VRI so I didn't see the big upgrade to this lens so I still have mine VRI lens. Before long even us pros won't be able to justify buying new gear. Even Nikon's new 80-400 4.5-5.6 is 2.5K. Are they serious. No 4.5-5.6 variable aperture lens is worth that. Come on Nikon and Canon get real in your pricing before we all have to switch to Sigma/Tamron

Agree with you Scott another evidence of wacky backy pricing is the 18K Nikon charges for the 800 F5.6 AFS VR whereas Canon's version was only £10k. Glad I got majority of my lenses couple of years ago when prices were cheaper; only regret was not picking up a Nikon 200-400 F4 AFS VR I back in 2007.

Direct link | Posted on May 15, 2013 at 21:39 UTC
In reply to:

nplanet: The Sony RX1 is such a big step forward that no other company is even close to releasing something similar.

How do you know; Canon and Nikon could be in later design or about to release one soon ?

Direct link | Posted on May 15, 2013 at 21:35 UTC

Rx1 is good winner; thought the Sony A99 or Nikon D7100 would win over the 6D or the Nikon D600 instead ?

Direct link | Posted on May 15, 2013 at 21:34 UTC as 21st comment | 1 reply
Total: 84, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »