Dan Tong

Lives in United States Chicago, United States
Works as a Computer Consultant, Photographer
Joined on Jan 3, 2003
About me:

Olympus 2100UZ
Minolta Dimage 7i
Canon S400
Canon EOS 300D

Comments

Total: 189, showing: 101 – 120
« First‹ Previous45678Next ›Last »
On article CameraMator connects your mobile devices and DSLR (56 comments in total)
In reply to:

KenEis: Wonder if I can use a cable and not the hot shoe for my Nikon D800 with this devise. HDMI or usb cable???
Ken

You don't have to use the hot shoe (it's simply for mechanical mount), and you use an L bracket w hot shoe and USB cable to connect the device to your camera.
See their web page w L bracket photo here:
http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/urashid/cameramator-wireless-tethered-photography

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2013 at 02:04 UTC
On article CameraMator connects your mobile devices and DSLR (56 comments in total)
In reply to:

Suave: A used Galaxy s2 off craigslist was $120, DSLRController was $10, and now I can control not "some" but pretty much any function of my camera.

As much as I like DSL controller, it requires a cable, and only works with a very limited set of cameras as of yet (and does not look like it will work with a lot more).

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2013 at 01:48 UTC
On article CameraMator connects your mobile devices and DSLR (56 comments in total)

This sounds like the best way to get a really good large screen remote view and also have lots of remote control over the camera. I'm waiting for a Android version that works with Sony RX-100 and Sony NEX cameras. It would also be extremely useful for it to work with video with all of the cameras. Great product and excellent pricing.

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2013 at 01:46 UTC as 5th comment
In reply to:

rogerhyam: What I would like is manual focus feedback in the *optical* viewfinder so these cameras behaved more like "real" range finders.

I find EVFs horrible to use. It feels like you are losing touch with the subject and going to watch TV instead.

As I get long sighted with age back-screens are becoming worse. I either need longer arms or half moon glasses - not sure which is worse.

This leaves me with DSLRs or Leica's as my only options. We need to eat so Leica's are out.

It is a shame as these Fujifilm cameras are soooo nearly right. Oh and Raw support on Mac would be nice ;)

Get yourself eyeglasses that focus at the correct distance for your cameras LCD screens (measured for comfortable arm position). Bifocal or Trifocal should do the job and still allow you, normal reading, camera LCD, and long distance vision.

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2013 at 23:39 UTC

A very good explanation of this feature. We need more articles of this caliber.

Another reason to admire Fuji for innovative thinking and the courage to be different.

Thanks,

Dan

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2013 at 23:36 UTC as 27th comment

Fuji deserves a lot of credit for innovation in sensor technology, look and feel, and for common sense design such as manual zoom lens control.

I'm very happy for the success of their newest set of cameras beginning with the X1 etc.

It's great when a company like Fuji is not simply doing the me too copycat routine - lacking innovation of its own.

Congratulations! and may you have well deserved success with these new models.

Thanks

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2013 at 21:52 UTC as 13th comment
On article Toshiba making Lytro-like lens for smartphones (13 comments in total)

I would have liked to find out whether they licensed the Lytro technology or developed their own version to avoid licensing fees.

Link | Posted on Dec 30, 2012 at 19:01 UTC as 2nd comment
On article The Lightroom catalog (304 comments in total)
In reply to:

rambler35: I believe Adobe made a big initial mistake by using the term "Import".

So often we hear of people being deterred from using LR because they think the word implies that somehow an extra copy of the file is always being created and/or moved to some special LR location on the HD.

I suppose the phrase "Make Lightroom aware of where the file is located, or being placed, on your hard drive" would have been more accurate (but wordy!) description of what is happening.

Trouble is, that like Adobe, I can't think of another word or simple expression which could be used instead of that slightly misleading word "Import".

-- Richard --

manage or index

Link | Posted on Dec 29, 2012 at 07:15 UTC
On article The Lightroom catalog (304 comments in total)
In reply to:

Pythagoras: how is this better than picasa? free software integrated with my email and websharing that has allowed metadata (tags) for years. as well as multiple organizing options and simple editing tools.
this is a real question. i haven't used lightroom, and i want someone to explain to me why i should use lightroom instead of picasa.

As far as organizing your images it is not better, it's just version of a data base and in my opinion not all that good.
However the editing power of Lightroom is very good. I don't care for enforced database management so I'm happy using Photoshop and one of several other image management programs with database management features which supplement Photoshop Bridge.

Link | Posted on Dec 29, 2012 at 07:13 UTC
On article 500px expanding into the cloud (34 comments in total)

A very good and even handed review of this site, but it would be extremely important to discuss the licensing issues, that some commenters have brought up.

Thanks

Link | Posted on Dec 28, 2012 at 17:47 UTC as 3rd comment
On article Roundup: Enthusiast Zoom Compact Cameras (424 comments in total)
In reply to:

Ron Outdoors: I'm don't see a mention of video quality.

Also, the page menus, usually on the right, are not there. Makes it a little hard to navigate. Maybe I'm missing the video page.

These days video features are, in my opinion, so much a part of the versatility of these smaller cameras that leaving it out is a terrible mistake.

Imagine a review of smartphones with little or no mention of still and video capabilities, even though the primary function is telephony.

As for the navigation for this review, once again, you have chosen for your convenience not for the viewers convenience.

Your new article system may make publishing these articles more convenient, but if the reader would like to re-read a section of the review without having to hunt page by page for a particular camera she/he is out of luck.

Does it take all that much work effort to have a table of contents for each camera and the conclusion section?
Do you think you have done your best to make the presentation excellent?

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2012 at 19:44 UTC
In reply to:

Cane: So funny watching all the old men enthusiast brick wall testers in here get their adult diapers in a wad when someone comes out with a product like this that's obviously not made for them. "What, your not taking pictures the same way it's always been done! This is blasphemy!"

Eat your apple sauce, this isn't made for you. And here's a shocker, you don't make up the target demographic for anything except maybe medicine and adult scooters, and especially most camera products. College and high school kids that aren't camera nerds far outnumber you. This is for them. They can have fun with this and anything new to the camera market isn't a threat, it's an asset. You don't have to buy it for it to succeed. You will be long gone by the time this is mainstream.

I don't think it has to do with age, but more with brains.

Link | Posted on Nov 16, 2012 at 21:09 UTC

Even if you have no interest in buying a Lytro camera you have to be impressed by the technological breaktrough that it represents, as well as how fast it went from the laboratory to an actual commercial product.

It's also a good indicator of the stupidity and arrogance of many of our posters, who smirk and insist on airing their ignorance whenever Lytro is discussed.

It reminds me of the many inane comments about other early digital camera innovations which these like minded "geniuses" dismissed.

It is often associated with the attitude that "If I have no interest in it (fill in whatever) then it is of no interest to anyone else and it is just plain dumb".

I can imagine a not too distant future where Light Field technology is used to make films and the director and editor will be able to change the DOF as well as some of the perspective after the film is shot.

Enjoy,

Dan

Link | Posted on Nov 16, 2012 at 21:07 UTC as 17th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

nicolaiecostel: Lytro is a joke. A cellphone takes better pictures. Just watch the DigitalREV review on youtube, it's a cracker :)

It's a joke only to someone who is ignorant and does not even know it.

Link | Posted on Nov 16, 2012 at 20:54 UTC
On article Adobe Photoshop CS6 for Photographers (54 comments in total)
In reply to:

Camediadude: I came here just to gaze at the girl.

I agree wit h S. Dilworth to some extent, especially after the rather inane tutorial by M. Evening we had recently.
There is no question that a pretty face captures my attention pretty quickly, so that serves the marketing of such books very well. But would it not be more interesting to do something a bit more creative? rather than the usual high fashion look. Isn't the goal of great photography to be creative rather than Slave to Fashion? : )

So, even though I agree w S. Dillworth, I think he goes a bit too far.

Dan

Link | Posted on Nov 5, 2012 at 23:39 UTC

A truly creative image. It's great to have the story of how it was done. I also enjoyed his comment on how it reflects the difference between the Powered (or Powerful) and the Powerless.

The more I look at this image, the more I appreciate it the angle of view, so dependent on the height, the framing angle (focal length & distance), the color tone, etc. Clearly you will not find an image like this on microstock : )

Iwan Baan is one photographer who, based on this example of his work, well deserves his success.

Thanks,

Dan

Link | Posted on Nov 5, 2012 at 23:26 UTC as 15th comment | 3 replies
Total: 189, showing: 101 – 120
« First‹ Previous45678Next ›Last »