citizenlouie

Joined on Jan 25, 2012

Comments

Total: 144, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Panasonic GX7 First Impressions Review (1200 comments in total)

Good new test method! I like it. I see no surprise with the test result though. RX100 II's IQ is the worst, the other three cameras shows similar results, with NEX 6 slightly better at base ISO. Olympus shows best color (no surprise), but the big surprise here is Panasonic's JPEG engine has improved to be fairly acceptable now. Great achievement.

Link | Posted on Aug 14, 2013 at 23:34 UTC as 196th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

peevee1: Correction data for a lens should be stored in a lens. Every lens has some NVRAM anyway (so body can read its identifier). Nikon and Canon got the protocol wrong.

@Just a Photographer. Nikon can do it like what Olympus does. Hook the lens to the camera body and run the update program. Both my 4/3 and m4/3 cameras/lenses are updated the same way. I think the reason Nikon does it this way though is because there are many legacy lenses in their library, whereas 4/3 and m4/3 are made for digital format from ground up (and distortion data was already embedded in the lens when they released). So what Nikon did was the only feasible way.

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2013 at 14:05 UTC

Just use common sense when reading reviews. If the review contains a lot of hyperboles and lack of objectivity, then I usually discount it more than the one that's more impartial and honest. Another thing I find is, some people are so happy about their purchase, which is nice they rave about their purchase, but please let us know what's the reference point. For example, some people say "it's the sharpest lens I have ever used." Which is nice, but how many lenses you have used is a very important criteria when people judge the quality of your review. Same can be said about negative reviews. I don't know if they're still teaching this in college, but when we do research (reading reviews is kind of like a purchase research), we need to know the credential of the person who wrote the article. An industry expert's words weigh more than someone who's merely very enthusiastic about the subject.

Link | Posted on Jul 16, 2013 at 00:50 UTC as 111th comment
On photo Amour... in the Wedding Rings challenge (11 comments in total)

Well deserved first place. Not only the subject is nice, but the attention to the backdrop is just excellent with meaningful use of shallow DoF. Amour means "love" in Spanish, and the other word in focus is rapport. Both show what a marriage should mean.

Link | Posted on Mar 18, 2013 at 22:08 UTC as 7th comment
On article Complete our survey for the chance to win an iPad (73 comments in total)

The survey is badly written. Feels like it's written by a new college grad who has never taken a statistics class with very limited language skill. Many questions are almost guaranteed to generate useless data. Some of the survey questions are painful to answer (I wanted to stop taking the survey several times) because the questions are so badly written. The survey should be sent to someone with knowledge of photography before it's gone live.

Link | Posted on Mar 6, 2013 at 04:00 UTC as 39th comment | 1 reply

I love the part "According to our exhaustive research" about the Asuka camera. LOL. I am sure you knew that already.

Link | Posted on Jan 29, 2013 at 04:17 UTC as 32nd comment | 3 replies

These are Holga killers. :D

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2013 at 20:02 UTC as 5th comment
On article Panasonic introduces ultrathin DMC-XS1 compact camera (11 comments in total)
In reply to:

logbi77: So we have Fujifilm naming a superzoom X-S1 while Panasonic names an ultrathin compact XS1.

It is very annoying isn't it? There is a Canon G series, and there is also a Panasonic G series. There is a Canon G1x, and there is a Panasonic GX1.

Some marketing department's conversations are weird. They typically ask for a special letter to be in the model name. The most popular ones are X, Z, and Q, but there is no Y. ;)

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2013 at 19:54 UTC
On article Just Posted: Pentax MX-1 hands-on preview (173 comments in total)

It is a nice looking camera. The edges at each side reminds me of the old film cameras made by Pentax and Minolta (both made beautiful cameras). The handling might be a little retro also though. It needs an eveready case for a good hand grip (that's what I do with my Olympus film OM cameras), since it doesn't have the removable hand grip add-on like the Olympus XZ-2 has.

I think the tapered end at the grip for XZ-2 is not just for modern line, but the thinner middle makes the much thicker end, essentially, a grip, without that recognizable hand grip look. A more subtle design of the modern camera. Many better designed compact cameras (including ILCs) have some sort of contour curves to compensate for the aesthetically pleasing but ergonomically awful thinner bodies.

Can't wait see the result of course. Especially a side by side comparison with the XZ-2.

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2013 at 19:47 UTC as 27th comment
On article Leica invites entries for its Oskar Barnack Award 2013 (34 comments in total)
In reply to:

onlooker: This blurb from the entry rules caught my attention:

"The images must also be stored with 72dpi in JPG format".

Good god, can Leica hire someone who actually has a clue? This is embarrassing.

I will not argue further though I do wish you two look out for more competitions that have such DPI requirement, look for your LCD monitors' DPI setting and see if you can change DPI also in your camera and play with Photoshop a bit to see the relationship between print output and DPI and megapixel counts. How that affects file size and print detail while keep the same megapixel counts.

Link | Posted on Dec 11, 2012 at 21:30 UTC
On article Leica invites entries for its Oskar Barnack Award 2013 (34 comments in total)
In reply to:

onlooker: This blurb from the entry rules caught my attention:

"The images must also be stored with 72dpi in JPG format".

Good god, can Leica hire someone who actually has a clue? This is embarrassing.

DPI is dot per inch. It's a resolution measurement, but not a dimension resolution measurement. Higher the DPI gives your photos better detail by increasing the pixel density packed per inch. You can set DPI setting in-camera. It does not affect pixel count, only density of it. DPI setting only affects JPEG, not RAW.

Link | Posted on Dec 10, 2012 at 23:40 UTC
On article Leica invites entries for its Oskar Barnack Award 2013 (34 comments in total)
In reply to:

onlooker: This blurb from the entry rules caught my attention:

"The images must also be stored with 72dpi in JPG format".

Good god, can Leica hire someone who actually has a clue? This is embarrassing.

This is a pretty standard rule in photo competitions. They only want 72dpi because that's the resolution of most LCD monitor. Anything higher will just be a waste of disk space. They'll receive thousands of entries, they only want to pre-filter the entries first. If they like your photo, they'll ask for something with higher resolution and possibly a print. Most entries even ask you to downsize your photos to less than 3 megapixel. At least Leica didn't ask you to down resolution your photos.

Link | Posted on Dec 10, 2012 at 19:04 UTC

Unfortunately, I see Aptina's sensor still has a weird color bias from this example shot. I hope Aptina is listening. When you're a sensor maker, you want to show that your sensor is capable of reproducing accurate, life-like color. The special color mix is for camera maker and photographer to decide. While this photo looks /interesting/, but if I were a camera manufacturer, i would not build my professional level cameras with this sensor. It'll be a major headache to tweak the color profile so it'll look natural. Most people still shoot normal photos, Instagram.

Link | Posted on Oct 9, 2012 at 18:56 UTC as 3rd comment
In reply to:

orendanger: am i the only one that wounders what camera that is in the picture?

@orendanger

Yes, there is. It is above the EVF. It's just obscured behind the accessory port cover, which is also hot shoe cover.

Link | Posted on Sep 30, 2012 at 16:55 UTC
In reply to:

Fotogeneticist: Until an EVF has the same refresh rate and dynamic range that matches my eye, it will never replace OVFs for me. What does an EVF give me except for battery drain and shadows you can't see into? And to the poster that said an EVF needs 2MP to out-resolve an OVF, if you out resolve what your eye can see anyways, what good would that do?

I can see more things in the dark with OVF than EVF. This varies of course from person to person, because OVF depends on your own eyes' unaided light sensitivity. EVF boosts the light level at the cost of color accuracy and noise level. I think current gen of EVF is good enough in term of resolution, but what's lacking is refresh rate and noise level under low light and lack of color accuracy under extreme bright light (which is quite often in California that you see light above EV16, which is cloudless sunlight, sometimes you might even encounter EV18 situation).

Link | Posted on Sep 30, 2012 at 16:53 UTC
On article Photokina 2012: Olympus Stand Report (48 comments in total)
In reply to:

David Burren: The most interesting news (for me) from Olympus is the new 15mm/8 lens. But no mention of it here? What gives?

As a fixed-aperture manual-(2-step)-focus lens it should even work on Pany bodies (although the lack of in-body stabilisation might be a drawback at f/8). At the suggested price it's almost a no-brainer: a slightly expensive lens cap that doubles as a super-cheap 30mm-e walkaround lens. It'll be interesting to hear more about it over time.

But not even a mention? Had me double-checking that I wasn't imagining it. :)

It's an interesting product, but don't expect it to be stellar in image quality. Notice it's not even a Zuiko lens, so Olympus doesn't think it's quality enough.

It's really a lomo lens to make E-PMx series pocketable and already ready for shoot. And when I feel like shooting with a Holga, this would be a digital alternative (i do expect it to be sharper than a Holga). But it's a fun lens. US$50 is a good price.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 19:49 UTC
On article Photokina 2012: Sony Stand Report (44 comments in total)
In reply to:

JRApprentice: I am just about to display my ignorance but what the heck.

You say 'just how hard it is to get so much camera into such a small body...' re the RX1. Funny that, from the exploded view it looks like a 35mm lens set in a body in front of of an image sensor with with a body back behind. The little Halina I had as a lad and loads of other rangefinder cameras in he sixties and seventies managed that and didn't claim any special achievement as a result. Is it the electronics which make this difficult or is there some other mystery of digital camera construction that I am unaware of?

Just asking.

John

Don't know the details, but heat is a major design constraint for modern DSLR, because of that LCD screen in the back. You need to space things out before the heat shut the entire camera down or simply make the final image too noisy (heat will introduce interference).

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 17:13 UTC
On article Photokina 2012: Sony Stand Report (44 comments in total)

The picture of RX1 shows off its aperture blades very well. Is it 9-blade construction? I think that might follow Zeiss philosophy very well for perfect bokeh.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 17:08 UTC as 10th comment | 1 reply
On article Photokina 2012: Olympus Stand Report (48 comments in total)
In reply to:

buongustaio: any news about the sooo much craved body that would better handle top-pro 4/3 lenses?
17mm aside, this is all i'm asking from this stand :)

Thank you Richard for keeping us posted. :-)

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2012 at 22:33 UTC
On article Photokina 2012: Olympus Stand Report (48 comments in total)
In reply to:

buongustaio: any news about the sooo much craved body that would better handle top-pro 4/3 lenses?
17mm aside, this is all i'm asking from this stand :)

Yes. And will there be a new 4/3 DSLR for that matter? (an E-5 or an E-620 successor?)

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2012 at 17:56 UTC
Total: 144, showing: 41 – 60
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »