Gesture

Gesture

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Jun 21, 2009

Comments

Total: 971, showing: 461 – 480
« First‹ Previous2223242526Next ›Last »
On Buyers' Guide: Compact Digital Cameras article (23 comments in total)
In reply to:

dszc: Ok, now I know what class of camera I want, but where is the info to help me choose which one?

Horrible. Not at all a typical dpReview quality article. :(

When are going to look more at printers and printing.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 10, 2013 at 03:37 UTC
On Pentax K-3 preview (959 comments in total)

Don't mind the GearShop at all. But why is camera after camera GearShop recommended, available for order before it is even in user's hands. The idea was these were cameras that DPReview know to be good cameras and thus recommended.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 9, 2013 at 17:57 UTC as 182nd comment
On Samsung announces curved Galaxy Round post (144 comments in total)

Should be a parabolic curve.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 9, 2013 at 17:52 UTC as 74th comment
On Pentax K-3 preview (959 comments in total)
In reply to:

raimaster: at least 10 highlights:
1. 24 MP
2. 8,3 fps - 23 raw buffer (first firmware)
3. 25 crosstype sensor - 3 luminance flux
4. On/Off AA Filter
5. Robust WR - metal + magnesium alloy body
6. AF -3EV
7. 86K pixel metering
8. 200.000 shutter circle
9. USB 3.0
10. Body IS
.....
also dual slot card, 14 bit raw video, focus peaking etc ...

I am impressed, also. Next, Pentax needs to develop the AF on sensor so LiveView is more valuable.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 8, 2013 at 02:42 UTC

Welcome, welcome upgrade and features to K-5 and a great competitor to Nikon D7100. But what is it with companies and naming. The next camera will be the K-1 and, then, there is no where to go. Others have boxed themselves in with naming everything the X Z and/or 1.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 8, 2013 at 00:30 UTC as 42nd comment | 6 replies
On Ten items you should have in your camera bag article (288 comments in total)

Good thoughts, also 25 centers for the phone booth ... oh, scratch that.

Small LED flashlight?

Direct link | Posted on Oct 5, 2013 at 02:40 UTC as 105th comment | 3 replies
On Olympus PEN E-P5 Review preview (499 comments in total)

I thought it was less costly to produce a camera without optical viewfinder and mirror box???

Direct link | Posted on Oct 3, 2013 at 23:55 UTC as 176th comment | 1 reply
On Nikon Coolpix P7800 real-world samples article (80 comments in total)

Utterly amazing. You can get many a 4/3rds camera from Olympus or Panasonic, even a DSLR, for less than the Nikon 7800 or Canon G16. Instead, why doesn't Canon advance the G1X and let Nikon come up with something similar.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 3, 2013 at 15:54 UTC as 13th comment | 2 replies

I hope PhotoNinja also takes a stab at Foveon sensor. You get great highlight recovery and noise handling for starters; also, PN handles the black point much better than other RAW converters I've tried.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 3, 2013 at 03:08 UTC as 15th comment
On Site update: two new forums article (32 comments in total)

Great idea. Have a place to discuss sensors, advances in focusing technology, lens design, etc.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 1, 2013 at 19:41 UTC as 29th comment
On First Impressions Review: Using the Canon PowerShot G16 article (352 comments in total)
In reply to:

AlexBakerPhotoz: These cameras are really nice but there are getting to be so many new small pocketable cameras with significantly larger sensors that I can't picture a serious enthusiast buying one in this category anymore. I'm in the market for a new small camera to have with me all the time instead of my bulky DSLRs, but am tilting to the 1" or APS-C sensor small cameras now available for not too much more $$.

Exactly.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 26, 2013 at 15:08 UTC
On First Impressions Review: Using the Canon PowerShot G16 article (352 comments in total)

I question whether this camera merits review with so many other exciting products being introduced. Regardless, it is disappointing that cameras of this size and cost haven't migrated to at least the sensor size of the Nikon 1, RX100 cameras. Develop the GIX. This model was ready for retirement.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 26, 2013 at 15:06 UTC as 97th comment
On Sony A3000 preview (678 comments in total)

How much, really, is one LCD over another? $5? $10?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 23, 2013 at 12:17 UTC as 31st comment
In reply to:

MPA1: Never been a big fan of Sigma lenses, or any of the third party makers to be honest.
My Nikkors have always seemed better built and drawn nicer images.

Some of our OEM lenses are made by the third party manufacturers and the OEMs have sold third party designs as "their own." I wouldn't thrown Tokina, Tamron and Sigma under the bus.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2013 at 21:18 UTC

What about the cameras?

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2013 at 21:16 UTC as 39th comment | 3 replies

Neat stuff. Looks high-tech and old school. We all remember grinding a telescope mirror as kids. Fantastic article by Dave and kudos to DPReview for linking it.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 20, 2013 at 20:26 UTC as 43rd comment | 3 replies

7-bladed diaphragm. Not to minimize, but, clearly, with modern design, prototype and manufacturing systems, it seems easier to move new models out the door. And that's not to say that the quality and technical accomplishments isn't quite high.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2013 at 02:29 UTC as 11th comment
On Fujifilm X-M1 Review preview (220 comments in total)
In reply to:

white shadow: I am looking for an excellent APS-C size mirrorless camera which can out perform a micro 4/3 camera in overall usage. The numerous succession of NEX has not been successful due to its poor lens collection and its "unfriendly" photographer user interface / Menu system. The Fuji X series could offer some hopes. However, it too falls short of expectation in many areas, many of which were pointed out in the reviews.

I like the size of the X-M1 but the slow AF speed and many other compromises cause me to hesitate buying this camera despite it getting a gold award.

Some has attributed the other problems to the X-trans sensor which I wouldn't disagree.

Samsung NX.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2013 at 01:16 UTC
On Fujifilm X-M1 Review preview (220 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mirrorless Crusader: DPR why are you giving almost every half-decent camera a gold star now? Literally a large a majority of $600+ cameras now are getting gold stars, it completely dilutes the rating system and makes it look like you are just using it as a marketing ploy to sell cameras at Gear Shop. Can't you come up with a system where only a few cameras at most each year get the top award? Then we would actually know which you really think are best, because right now it looks like you're just trying to satisfy everybody and as a result satisfying nobody.

They also hit the GearShop before they hit the street and we get some accumulated user experience. Remember, orbs.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2013 at 01:13 UTC
On Fujifilm X-M1 Review preview (220 comments in total)
In reply to:

thx1138: Hadn't realised the M1 had no EVF or option. I had just assumed that was the A1. Oh well another coulda shoulda woulda camera.

Not really sure what Fuji's thinking is here. One the one hand they think you are sophisticated enough to understands the benefits of a big sensor, and IL, and DoF and manual control, but think you are still so amateurish as to hold a camera at arms length to frame a scene, in bright sunlight where the VF can hardly be seen and the camera is far less stable and more prone to shake.

So is it still a P&S or a serious camera?

+++

Direct link | Posted on Sep 18, 2013 at 01:06 UTC
Total: 971, showing: 461 – 480
« First‹ Previous2223242526Next ›Last »