OrdinarilyInordinate: This just looks like a Samsung NX3000/NX300M hybrid to me in a Sony package (shape and compact power zoom lens of the same range like NX3000, hybrid AF and touch screen like NX300/NX300M and many other Samsung versions, and 180 selfie screen like NX300M/NX3000).
Lot of common DNA in the modern digital camera. But Samsung models have looked like Sony.
Chaitanya S: Sony needs to start releasing some good lenses for mirrorless system and stop pushing so many bodies. Micro 4/3 and fuji x system have best choices of glass options right now.
Samsung NX also. But I expect there are more than enough lenses for any system out there now.
5400 RPM 8 MB Cache is not an impressive specification.
Thanks for the generous sharing of your image and technique and doing something "nontraditional" and "different," which I think portrays this obviously magical place in a more profound way.
dash2k8: Don't know if anyone already commented on this, but as an owner of the A7s, I absolutely HATE the position of the video record button. Would it have killed Sony to place it anywhere else? As it is, pressing the REC button induces a shake that ruins the first 10 or so frames of the video. This annoyance aside, so far it's been great.
Exactly. Silly red video buttons. Except cameras that put it on the top. Otherwise, these push forward buttons are terrible, especially with finderless cameras you are already holding precariously.
We don't know what we've lost until it's gone. If the camera has to be in Movie Mode, the more useful shutter button can be used to start and stop video recording.
I think comparative reviews like this are a good idea:
VideoAF speed and precisionDynamic rangeViewfinder systems (Although only Fuji and to a certain extent Sony have attempted to innovate)
Just 4 of the areas in which such reviews could be useful.
I know I need more knowledge about what it really means when a Canon PS 300HS and Canon EOS-M both do 1980 x 1080 HD video-think of the difference in sensor size!
Execution doesn't quite match from what I expected from the description. Overmanipulated. Underwhelmed. Great potential if done subtly.
tipple: With the Sony RX100mk111, Panasonic FZ1000, the Samsung NXMini, Nikon V3, it looks as if nthe 1inch sensor cameras have a lot to offer anyone in the market for a new/different camera. Results are very good pics.
I agree except at these prices, even if somewhat larger, I'd go APS-C sensor, maybe even Sony A6000.
Don't care if I get panned. USPS is superb. The speed packages go cross-country and the local delivery person knows you and watches for your items. The "deficits" are because of the way USPS must fund pension and health care obligations vis a vis other nonprofit organizations, as I understand it.
I find less "crush" issues when USPS and FedEx deliver a package. A great postal system is an important part of a democracy.
Just a Photographer: None of the images shown in the example require 79 AF Points nor 12 fps.
If DPReview was serious with their real world samples. Why didn't they go to a football match, motorsports or shoot birds in flight?
Good to see some Sony enthusiasts in the comments. This camera is quite appealing and I like that Sony (and Fuji, although in different ways) are trying to push the technology envelope versus some other OEMs.
I think Ricoh should focus on premium quality compact that would appeal to its APS-C owners. Olympus only has micro 4/3rds, but it has some excellent to outstanding compact cameras for its "family:" the XZ cameras, the Stylus 1, even the SH cameras are strong.
MOD Manufacture on Demand.
mwstebbins: I just bought this camera at the HIGHER price. IT has NOT yet arrived at my house. Does anyone know if SOny will rebate the difference? Or do I have to send the camera back to them UNOPENED, and buy another one? Thanks. M
Impressive and sensible response.
Poss: Thanks Apple for pushing me firmly into Adobe’s hands.One of the deciding factors of getting a MBP instead of a “regular” win laptop was Aperture. I was opening my wedding business and wanted a good, project oriented, raw workflow solution that enabled me to post process and output stuff under an integrated environment all within a colour managed umbrella throughout. Aperture was that application. To this very day, its integrated album design/ book making is better than anything else on the market. I know some would argue there are better solutions out there and I agree to a degree but in terms of an integrated one app stop, Aperture is still better (no offence to other wedding folk out there with a CC-Fundy or similar workflow).It is obvious Apple is more concerned now with its iOS/ consumer cash cows than its old pro user base. What this will mean for the working pros remains to be seen. My new workhorse is an 8 core Dell and my next laptop might end up being a high spec Asus….
Apple has gotten stubborn. For years now, many of us old-timers would like an affordable ($1,000) new tower. Would it sell like iPad or iPhone, no, but what does that matter. With modern manufacturing, Apple could offer an affordable tower. Companies get stubborn and not interested in upgrade path any longer.
Stewart McKInlay: As there is no mention of the new Photos for OSX being able to manipulate photos like Aperture we can only assume a dumbing down as suggested is happening. Most of us who enjoyed Aperture will feel sorely let down. But as usual Apple will expect loyalty from us!
"As someone said here already: apple used to define their own markets and now they're just following the masses.:"
It's really about manipulating a photo on a smartphone or tablet screen. I plan on migrating to specialist pro solutions, i.e. PhotoNinja for RAW processing.
BHPhotog: I should have seen it coming when Apple "updated" Pages, redesigned it for the iOS crowd and dropped (at last count) 87 features turning what was an elegant feature-rich alternative to MSWord into a piece of crap. Same thing here, throw the serious users under the bus. Good for Apple I guess, butmI remember when they created markets instead of following them.
Next up: taking away the computer mouse. We will be editing photos and writing documents by waving our hands in front of our field of vision with about 1/1,000 the proprioception if the best mouses. Progress is not always so.
Interesting to see. Photos for OSX sounds like an enhanced iPhoto? Interestingly, iPhoto and even Preview can manipulate RAW files.
Non-event. The photo industry is getting awful mature.
similaar: That is unheard of!!Oh, no, wait, I did the exact same thing 18 months ago...http://www.similaar.com/foto/oldcam/oldcam.html
What surprised me most is that the image didn't look "old" by itself: the lens in that 100-year-old camera is slow but not bad at all.
Nicely done. Thanks for sharing.