Lives in United States Sunnyvale, CA, United States
Works as a Software Engineer
Joined on Jan 31, 2012


Total: 23, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article Sony introduces new XQD and SD cards (57 comments in total)

The irony is there is no Sony digital camera to support these fast cards.
Been years they've stick to USB 2.0 and UHS-I, even worse with A7rII which generate 80MB raw files.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 7, 2016 at 20:50 UTC as 20th comment | 4 replies

It's like FZ1000 vs RX10 all over again:
6 month later, but with more affordable price and features.
anticipate discounts with RX100 series, love the competition.

Direct link | Posted on Jan 5, 2016 at 20:03 UTC as 23rd comment | 1 reply
On article Fujifilm X-T10 Review (508 comments in total)

I really want fuji to consider upgrade their sensor to at least 24Mp to match the competition.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 4, 2015 at 20:47 UTC as 86th comment | 7 replies

I don't know how is that bundle price comes from.
Got my panasonic 14mm f2.5 for only $129 years ago.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 20, 2015 at 21:38 UTC as 26th comment | 2 replies
On article Ricoh GR II: What's new and what does it mean? (205 comments in total)

I think GR II did 2 things right:
1. Save you $30 to buy a eye-fi card
2. You can now purchase clearance priced GR

Direct link | Posted on Jun 17, 2015 at 22:43 UTC as 67th comment | 1 reply

Looks like Sony recycled the lens on RX10, it's still say "Carl Zeiss" instead of "Zeiss".

Direct link | Posted on Jun 10, 2015 at 23:22 UTC as 78th comment

Actually, the optical construction worth $499, it's the golden ring triple the price, Can't imaging what will happen when Nikon release a lens with double golden rings...

Direct link | Posted on Oct 17, 2013 at 04:14 UTC as 64th comment | 1 reply
On article Google+ gets improved Raw-to-JPEG conversion (50 comments in total)

Fuji user don't Google+

Direct link | Posted on Sep 26, 2013 at 20:42 UTC as 25th comment
In reply to:

Marek Rucinski: This is an example of an interesting practice: put some hardware in the device, for which the user pays (the cost of the wifi chip was included in the price), and then increase the value proposition of the product (by enabling the feature) *after* the product has been sold (!)... or not.

I think this practice is not only dishonest, but also damaging to the client (who pays for a feature he may never see enabled in the end) and therefore should attract attention of relevant regulating bodies.

Sadly, examples of very similar practices start to pop out regularly (uncompressed hdmi in Canon 5d III, cropped hdmi output in Nikon D600), but this seems to be the boldest example to date. In case of Canon/Nikon it's difficult to prove dishonesty, because they can claim genius, and incompetence of their engineers, respectively. Situation here is different, because there are physical chips that were obviously meant to be there from the beginning, but were intentionally not enabled.

I have a Sony action camera got the latest firmware to enable 1080/60p recording, previously it only have 1080/30p.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 20, 2013 at 00:42 UTC

My jaw dropped

Direct link | Posted on Jun 14, 2013 at 05:59 UTC as 130th comment

Nice~ I guess the price is no less than $499

Direct link | Posted on Apr 17, 2013 at 05:06 UTC as 27th comment | 1 reply
On article Pentax offers K-30 in a variety of colors and finishes (118 comments in total)

No green one?? how can I complete my rainbow sets.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 2, 2013 at 23:58 UTC as 66th comment | 2 replies
On article Just posted: Sony Alpha NEX-6 Review (330 comments in total)

I was on the edge to sell my NEX-6 for NEX-7n and saw this, NEX-6 is great, but I prefer NEX-7/n's Tri-nav control style.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 26, 2013 at 00:39 UTC as 81st comment | 5 replies
On article Hands-on with Nikon V2 (455 comments in total)

Nice, another reason to prank those nikon fanboys.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 25, 2012 at 19:41 UTC as 191st comment
On article Interview - Phil Molyneux, President Sony Electronics (132 comments in total)
In reply to:

Scrozzy: Did anyone else play the drinking game where you have to take a shot every time he says "disruptive"?

I was wondering the same thing... he mentioned "disruptive" 3 times, it seems to me, like Sony want to be the "Apple" in mobile world.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 15, 2012 at 20:18 UTC
On Connect post Cameras get 'smart' to stay competitive (58 comments in total)

My brief test of NEX-5R using wifi viewfinder:

Direct link | Posted on Oct 13, 2012 at 00:59 UTC as 22nd comment
In reply to:

Combatmedic870: *Face Palm*

Its just a phone....Just like the 15 other phones that have been released this year. There are better phones with better cameras.

Once one has one of the exmor RS sensors wake me up.

iPhone share the same sensor with others, but it has distinctive apps make it better for casual and creative photo taking and sharing.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 24, 2012 at 19:04 UTC
On article Apple releases version 1.1 of iPhoto for iOS (15 comments in total)

What's good on iOS and Mac is you buy the app once and enjoy on 5 different computers/devices with years of free major updates (PS: OS excluded). So no worries to be an early bird with a trustworthy company.
I just hope Microsoft/Adobe can make this happen to their loyal users. I hate to buy different license for different platform and pay a premium when newer version comes out.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 19, 2012 at 23:20 UTC as 8th comment | 3 replies
On article Leica reveals D-Lux 6 fast-lensed enthusiast compact (19 comments in total)
In reply to:

qwertyasdf: When I hear of rebranding, I think of Vivitar, Pro-optic, Opteka, Bower, Rokinon. Etc.
Well, I guess I'll have to add Leica to the list

you should add it 3 years ago...

Direct link | Posted on Sep 17, 2012 at 21:26 UTC
In reply to:

ageha: "Battery Life (CIPA) 230"


maybe canon use a Pentium 4 EE for its cpu

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 10:36 UTC
Total: 23, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »