Jostian: iPhone 6+ is fine but the Note 4 matches its IQ, quite a few comparative reviews show this, I'm not that impressed with what I see from my friends 6+ and the 1020 easily beats the 6+ for IQ and should be rated.
As the for IQ (only reason DxO rates the 1020 lower is due to its poor video score, but for photos it wallops everything else)... come on Connect lose the iPhone bias for once, its good but it aint the best....
Even if it is outdated and slow it would still be nice to see the lumia 1020 in the comparison, as I I'm sure it remains the gold standard with regards to image quality (not mentioning the 808). It is in a different league to the 930 (and presumably the 1520). Some of us are happy to buy a phone second hand if it allows us to get the best images
Jogger: Its good to have options, but, i dont bother with RAW on sensors smaller than APSc. At that point, you are just shooting for fun and need convenience more than absolute image quality.
Put another way, if you do care enough about image quality to shoot RAW.. why bother with anything less than APSc.
What if you want a camera with decent image quality in a pocketable package? The Sony RX100 JPEG quality is good but RAW gives more headroom in many situations. The sensor is very much smaller than APSc
Jogger: Surface Pro is so much better, esp. with far better display and Wacom digitizer, and no Apple Tax.. but, youre not a real photographer if you dont use Mac.
The surface pro 2 is a great device for photography. I have been using the 8GB/256GB version and it is super speedy for photo processing. The wacom digitiser is the big feature that really can make a difference to workflow. Having gotten used to a high res display I would not been keen on downgrading to MBA resolution. The screen size for me however too small for serious work and a MBA 13 inch (HD of course) would probably work for me much better. On a plus side the SP2 will output to a 4K monitor through the displayport if need be.
T3: It's really too bad that Nokia only uses Windows OS (and now is owned by Microsoft). If Nokia offered Android versions of their devices, I'd buy them. They make good hardware. I'm just not interested in Windows Phone 8 or Windows 8. And a lot of people feel the same way: like the Nokia hardware, don't like the Windows OS,
I actually hope they don't offer this on android. I like the windows OS and hope that these excellent cameras will help build up a strong user base.
I look forward to similar articles when the next android, windows phone and blackberry operating system updates are released
Installed the trial version of photoshop CC as I was interested to know whether camera shake reduction could help salvage a few important photos that had a little too much shake. Sadly I didn't find it very helpful and therefore will be sticking with CS5 - the software I own
VivaLasVegas: Same old SLT technology, a Van Gogh machine needing a modern set of brushes at high ISOs. The AWB is extreme off too. Oh please, don't blame DPR staff, only if DPR gives gold for specs.
Another predictably negative response from yourself
Sorry I meant to mention - New Zealand
I think the review is spot on. With such a thorough analysis it is easy to draw your own conclusion and determine which of the pros and cons are important to you. I'm looking for a compact which will potentially photograph the aurora at mid latitudes. F1.8 at the widest setting with good ISO ability sets it apart from others for this purpose however I don't think it goes quite wide enough for my liking. I would have liked ability to add ND grad filters and an intervalometer.