mg_k

mg_k

Lives in Australia Australia
Joined on May 1, 2011

Comments

Total: 29, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II Review preview (1166 comments in total)
In reply to:

Love Photography 888: This camera makes the D750 look like the bargain of the year.

@ Thys D750 is an entry level DSLR? lol
What a retarded comparison comparing a 24mp ff vs 20mp APS-C to being with.
D750 cr@ps all over the 6D, it's not even remotely close.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 15, 2014 at 07:19 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II Review preview (1166 comments in total)
In reply to:

DanK♂ FP6900: I looked at some image comparisons in this review and other sites with FujiFilm X-A1 and this and I don't know who would be smart enough to buy this overpriced POS with subpar IQ. When you can get better IQ in a smaller and cheaper package why bother with this at all? Yes, there are more features and lens options with this cam, but I personally don't need all that.

@ DanK♂ FP6900 - Can X-A1 even do continuous AF? LOL
For moving subject if your camera can't focus it doesn't matter how good the IQ is, so stop comparing apple with oranges.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 14, 2014 at 07:18 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II Review preview (1166 comments in total)
In reply to:

Love Photography 888: This camera makes the D750 look like the bargain of the year.

@ lightmatters - Extra reach is the main reason why "amateur/low budget* bird/wildlife guys still prefer APS-C over fullframe.

There, fixed it for ya.

Direct link | Posted on Dec 14, 2014 at 07:16 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II Review preview (1166 comments in total)
In reply to:

across_mountains: I have a 7D. I was hoping for the Mark II to have an articulated screen. Unfortunately, the 7D Mark II lacks it. While most of my photography doesn't need it, I've taken enough that I wish the Mark II had an articulated screen so that I wouldn't have to engage in Hail Mary picture taking. I'm disappointed.

7D is *serious*?

Direct link | Posted on Dec 14, 2014 at 07:15 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2702 comments in total)
In reply to:

Zerg2905: OK: the first one that will post a high ISO picture (at 6400, say...) from the new 7D II will get a beer from me, as I am curious if this is the 70D, or something else.

tbcass fyi @ ISO6400 the Sony sensor in your A77II is no better than the Canon, meaning they are both crap.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 13:10 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2702 comments in total)
In reply to:

Lab D: First I read this and then I saw the new Samsung. I don't know anyone who buys Samsung, but it seems to beat the 7D in every spec.
For example 10 FPS is not exciting when others are offering 11,12 and 15 FPS. "Full HD" video is boring when other shoot 4K.
I just hope the 7D does use the same technology in this new sensor as found in the Rebel T2i.

@ tbcass LOL @ world class.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 13:08 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2702 comments in total)
In reply to:

Geomaticsman: If Nikon doesn't respond with (or even leak news of) a DX competitor by the time the 7DII is available for purchase, I dare say is sayonara Nikon for me. No doubt the "70D" sensor is a disappointment, but virtually everything else in the 7DII is exactly what I'm looking for in a DX body. Add Canon's superb supertele selection to the mix and superior TC's, plus the fact that Nikon killed my favourite post processing engine (CNX2), and you know...I think I could live with the sensor performance everything else being considered. Certainly nothing wrong with the 1Dx or 5DIII as a backup either.

Sorry Nikon, I only have so much patience...life is short and death is long.

@ tbcass Don't embarrass yourself.

A77II's 15 crosstype vs 7D2's 65 crosstypes (with dual cross in middle), with a whole array of custom AF configuration and HUGE buffer depth.

The 7D2 simply excels in what it's meant to do best. Don't even put the Sony in the same sentence.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 13:06 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2702 comments in total)
In reply to:

photo nuts: Same old same old 11+ stops of dynamic range at base ISO?

Sigh Sigh Sigh

@ 3tagebart you can't?

Then this camera clearly isn't for you.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 12:53 UTC
On Canon EOS 7D Mark II First Impressions Review preview (2702 comments in total)
In reply to:

photo nuts: Same old same old 11+ stops of dynamic range at base ISO?

Sigh Sigh Sigh

lol no target audience buys this camera to shoot at base ISO nor care much about the DR. Learn to identify the right tool for the right job.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 15, 2014 at 12:44 UTC
On DSCF0160_1 photo in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (4 comments in total)

severely underexposed too.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 7, 2014 at 05:13 UTC as 3rd comment
On Fujifilm X-T1 real-world samples gallery article (187 comments in total)
In reply to:

SiliconVoid: I was not aware DPR, or the photographic community in general, had begun evaluating camera equipment on the basis of whether the user, or subjective audience, is instantly elevated to being a better photographer simply by holding/using or viewing images taken with said equipment... O.o
An image does not need to awe its audience in subject, composition, or creative lighting in order to represent a technical example of what the equipment is capable of providing. These are 'real-world' shots after all, that means just like the bulk of your 'real-world' shots sitting on 'your' computer there are any number of images that would not impress anyone photographically..
Just as one can strip a nut with a $75 wrench, someone else can get the job done with a $5 pair of pliers - the tool is being evaluated here, not the wielder... Enough already.

@ Ranford Stealth - at the end of the day, it's d preview that looks bad by posting these mediocre samples.

If I'm Fuji I would stop sending pre-production Fuji to d preview, they just make camera look bad than what they really are...

Direct link | Posted on Feb 5, 2014 at 04:48 UTC
On Fujifilm X-T1 real-world samples gallery article (187 comments in total)
In reply to:

SiliconVoid: I was not aware DPR, or the photographic community in general, had begun evaluating camera equipment on the basis of whether the user, or subjective audience, is instantly elevated to being a better photographer simply by holding/using or viewing images taken with said equipment... O.o
An image does not need to awe its audience in subject, composition, or creative lighting in order to represent a technical example of what the equipment is capable of providing. These are 'real-world' shots after all, that means just like the bulk of your 'real-world' shots sitting on 'your' computer there are any number of images that would not impress anyone photographically..
Just as one can strip a nut with a $75 wrench, someone else can get the job done with a $5 pair of pliers - the tool is being evaluated here, not the wielder... Enough already.

I have to disagree.

Fuji gave d preview to showcase their camera. Therefore the photos make a huge impact for us readers to determine whether or not to purchase the product.

Uploading mediocre samples really isn't helping Fuji.

Thanks D preview, your samples helped me NOT to buy this camera.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 5, 2014 at 03:43 UTC
On Olympus OM-D E-M1 Review preview (2066 comments in total)
In reply to:

Zigadiboom: You see the Mazda 6 is a very good quality car in its own right. However if you try and price it the same as a BMW 5 series or Mercedes E class then it doesn't seem like such a good deal anymore.

Well said.

This is like when netbook first came out. It was meant to be cheaper, lighter and easier to carry compared to normal laptop.

As time goes by, they are packing more features, getting faster, bigger and heavier, and priced it the same as a well featured laptop, and that's how it all went wrong....

So let me ask you - where is netbooks now? :P

Direct link | Posted on Sep 10, 2013 at 14:04 UTC
On Sony Cyber-shot RX1R Samples Gallery Expanded! article (70 comments in total)
In reply to:

white shadow: A reasonably good selection of shots in a variety of situation. Keep it up for other camera reviews like the coming 70D.

A good pocketable camera for travel but the price is rather expensive.

I am using a similar setup for travel; using a Zeiss ZE 35mm f/2.0 on the Canon 5D MkII. Seems to get better results.

Maybe DPR should do a comparison, if not with the 5D MkII then with the 5D MkIII with a Zeiss ZE 35mm f2.0 lens. If the result is on par or better then this IS the camera to go for if one want to travel light.

I just had a look at the samples too, pretty impressive, but I think my 5D3 + Sigma 35 combo is sharper.

I know it's a different beast, but just sayin...

Direct link | Posted on Aug 20, 2013 at 05:22 UTC
In reply to:

nofumble: Supersize your sensor please

Not gonna happen...

I sort of agree thou, no matter how feature-rich it is, it's still just a 16mp 4/3 sensor. That will always be the bottleneck.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 1, 2013 at 07:04 UTC
On DxOMark examines lenses for the Canon EOS 5D Mark III article (60 comments in total)

Wow so according to DxOMark the best combo with the highest sharpness prime is Sigma 85!? What a surprise!

Maybe I should re-purchase it :P

Direct link | Posted on Apr 5, 2013 at 12:08 UTC as 17th comment
In reply to:

Anaxagoras: No built-in flash - disappointing
No built-in GPS - disappointing

No viewfinder - APPALLINGLY BAD, Canon

@Anaxagoras

Funnily enough, no professional photographers use mirrorless, regardless of whether it has an EVF/OVF or not.

So what's your point??

'And as far as I know, ALL Canon's dSLRS (professional or amateur) have viewfinders.'

And this isn't a DSLR...so your point again?

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 13:59 UTC
In reply to:

t ait: Great that they copied the big sensor and the compatibility to their "standard" lenses from Sony. But they are making a big mistake by positioning this camera as a "beginner's" device. They should not be trying to protect their budget DSLRs, but should replace them with much compacter cameras. No enthusiast photographer buys big cameras anymore, they simply make no sense anymore...

'No enthusiast photographer buys big cameras anymore'

um define enthusiast??

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 13:57 UTC
In reply to:

Peter Sills: Well, let's see.

Very interesting.

No EVF. No tilting display. No real controls (physical thumb dial).

Camera aimed at the amateur. Camera aimed to knock Nikon's V1 out.

Too expensive for what it is. Canon, you need to cannibalize your own market in order to succeed. Why should I buy this vs. the Sony offerings? Are you going to have a "pro" version in time for Photokina?

@ Mike99999

You seriosuly think an EP2 + Pana 20f1.7 combo is better than this?? The EVF for the EP2 is crap anyway, I wouldn't even bother with that.

Sure m43 has more lenses available if you are building a COMPLETE system.

A lot of people are buying this as a smaller, lighter second package alongside a ff setup. I am more than happy with the EF-M and the 35mm FoV pancake only.

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 09:43 UTC
In reply to:

Peter Sills: Well, let's see.

Very interesting.

No EVF. No tilting display. No real controls (physical thumb dial).

Camera aimed at the amateur. Camera aimed to knock Nikon's V1 out.

Too expensive for what it is. Canon, you need to cannibalize your own market in order to succeed. Why should I buy this vs. the Sony offerings? Are you going to have a "pro" version in time for Photokina?

expensive compared to what?

It's about the same price as an EPM1 + Pana 20 1.7.

I take the Canon offering anyday. Larger sensor, standard 35mm FoV pancake, touch screen, 31 AF points, AF with all EF/EF-S lens via adapter.

What's not to like??

Direct link | Posted on Jul 23, 2012 at 09:26 UTC
Total: 29, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »