-
That's still a Nex camera with E-mount
https://vimeo.com/63672082
-
In Fuji X-E1 review
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/fuji-x-e1/fuji-x-e1A.HTM
k-5II is one of the camera in comparison
-
"Sensors are different, but Fuji trick is the same..." There is no "trick". Dxomark "measured" ISO is measuring highlight clipping. It's not measuring shutter speed/exposure. This is not standard...
-
No, it's not. Read the DPR review. It's worst in the class
-
These are all your opinions. The reviewers who have used both cameras agree with what I posted above. If you want to review your own cameras, start your own site. Don't insult reviewers by calling...
-
These are all your opinions. The reviewers who have used both cameras agree with what I posted above. If you want to review your own cameras, start your own site.
-
Keep in mind that the difference between ISO 2500 (RX1) and ISO 2900 (Nikon D800) is only 1/4 stops.So in fact, these ISO scores are really close. You aren't going to notice 1/4 stop difference...
-
"Maybe they know something is coming from Canon?" Canon is not a big player in sensor technology. There are other far far bigger (for example, Samsung) players here. Plus Canon doesn't even sell...
-
"The K 01 is every bit as good" Apart from image quality, which might be equal, K 01 is worse in every single imaginable way. No viewfinder. Slower AF. Thicker. Worse ergonomics.
-
"The K 01 is every bit as good" Apart from image quality, which might be equal, K 01 is worse in every single imaginable way. No viewfinder. Slower AF. Thicker. Worse ergonomics. Worse design....
-
D1N0 is known to post idiotic comments like these. Yes, we are talking about RAW already, genius!
-
D1N0 is known to post idiotic comments like these. Yes, we are talking about RAW already, genius! The topic is sensor itself.
-
If it's selling for $299 that's because it was a flop. No one was buying it at a price that would generate profit for the company. That's not a technical reason for the camera to exist. That just...
-
If it's selling for $299 that's because it was a flop. No one was buying it at a price that would generate profit for the company. That's not a technical reason for the camera to exist. That just...
-
Nex was a commercial success. K01 was a flop. Apparently that is too difficult for you to understand.
-
Nex is a commercial success. K01 is a flop. Apparently that is too difficult for you to understand.
-
http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2013/02/25/imaging-resource-camera-of-the-year-awards-2012
-
RX1 does gave external EVF. K01 didn't even have such an option.
-
Yes on this planet. Check OMD review. Compare studio shots. Read the DPR conclusion. Only rabid Pentax fanboys claim anything negative about OMD image quality.
-
fakuryu, that's BS. OMD more than holds image quality compared any APSC on the planet. OMDvhas incredible image quality. It's one thing to be a Pentax fanboy, and it's another thing to be a liar.
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
| Total messages |
441 |
| Threads started |
53 |
| Last post |
2 months ago |
Myari has not added any dpreview gear yet.
|