Myari

That's still a Nex camera with E-mount https://vimeo.com/63672082

In Fuji X-E1 review  http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/fuji-x-e1/fuji-x-e1A.HTM k-5II is one of the camera in comparison

"Sensors are different, but Fuji trick is the same..."

There is no "trick". Dxomark "measured" ISO is measuring highlight clipping. It's not measuring shutter speed/exposure. This is not standard...

No, it's not. Read the DPR review. It's worst in the class

These are all your opinions. The reviewers who have used both cameras agree with what I posted above.

If you want to review your own cameras, start your own site. Don't insult reviewers by calling...

These are all your opinions. The reviewers who have used both cameras agree with what I posted above.

If you want to review your own cameras, start your own site.

Keep in mind that the difference between ISO 2500 (RX1) and ISO 2900 (Nikon D800) is only 1/4 stops.So in fact, these ISO scores are really close. You aren't going to notice 1/4 stop difference...

"Maybe they know something is coming from Canon?"

Canon is not a big player in sensor technology. There are other far far bigger (for example, Samsung) players here.

Plus Canon doesn't even sell...

"The K 01 is every bit as good"

Apart from image quality, which might be equal, K 01 is worse in every single imaginable way. No viewfinder. Slower AF. Thicker. Worse ergonomics.

"The K 01 is every bit as good"

Apart from image quality, which might be equal, K 01 is worse in every single imaginable way. No viewfinder. Slower AF. Thicker. Worse ergonomics. Worse design....

D1N0 is known to post idiotic comments like these. Yes, we are talking about RAW already, genius!

D1N0 is known to post idiotic comments like these. Yes, we are talking about RAW already, genius! The topic is sensor itself.

If it's selling for $299 that's because it was a flop. No one was buying it at a price that would generate profit for the company. That's not a technical reason for the camera to exist. That just...

If it's selling for $299 that's because it was a flop. No one was buying it at a price that would generate profit for the company. That's not a technical reason for the camera to exist. That just...

Nex was a commercial success. K01 was a flop. Apparently that is too difficult for you to understand.

Nex is a commercial success. K01 is a flop. Apparently that is too difficult for you to understand.

http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2013/02/25/imaging-resource-camera-of-the-year-awards-2012

RX1 does gave external EVF. K01 didn't even have such an option.

Yes on this planet. Check OMD review. Compare studio shots. Read the DPR conclusion. Only rabid Pentax fanboys claim anything negative about OMD image quality.

fakuryu, that's BS. OMD more than holds image quality compared any APSC on the planet. OMDvhas incredible image quality. It's one thing to be a Pentax fanboy, and it's another thing to be a liar.