pacnwhobbyist: Would like to see sample photos with the 18-140 lens as well. Given that a lot of folks will have it as their first lens when they buy the kit that includes it.
@Neil Holms -- the consistency of the autofocus from shot to shot. Best to read DPReview's own review from September 2013 section 5 -- http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/sigma-18-35-1-8
Would you recommend this lens if intended for all-day shooting at an indoor convention event? (e.g., comic con, car show, etc.)
D Webb: I don't even know why anyone bothers with these sample galleries unless it's a radically new design. We all know what the pictures are going to be like. Unless there is yet another failure of some kind with this camera, it's going to be just like the D7000/7100 until you get down to the nitty-gritty and start getting threads posted from real users.
I like the galleries very much. Keep them coming, thanks.
Did the Sigma exhibit any of the autofocus problems, as described in its own review?
Very nice video. Keep them coming, DPR!
jonmcguffinphoto: It never ceases to amaze me the ignorance of modern day digital photographers and their insistence that not using photoshop somehow makes them a "pure" photographer as this is simply a misguided assumption.
All digital files are processed! You are either doing it yourself with tools such as Lightroom, Photoshop, or others or you are allowing the Engineers at Canon/Nikon to be your post processor by running your image through their jpg processing engine and spitting out what "it" thinks is the best way to present the image.
To imply that there is anything truly "straight out of camera" is really absurd and does nothing but show their ignorance of the photographic process in a digital world.
Don't break your arm getting down off your high horse.
This same question can be asked regarding computers and cell phones. We tend to objectify these things and lose sight of their (basically) utilitarian nature.