Lives in United States CO, United States
Works as a retired
Joined on Jun 22, 2010


Total: 26, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »

Sony will focus on sensors for vehicles and phones, each heading rapidly toward a billion sensors a year. Sony is doing extremely well in this market. Sensors for cameras, a rapidly declining market measured at less than 1/10th of one percent of the phone/ vehicle market.

With a growing multi-billion sensor market out there, they will soon stop wasting their time on the collapsing multi-million sensor camera market.

My worthless opinion, within 5 years, only Panasonic will be making camera sensors.

If Pany just made a full frame version of their current 4/3rds sensor, it would be 64 MP. When it comes to sensor technology, Panasonic is the world leader; not Sony, Samsung, Fuji or Canon.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 20, 2015 at 04:32 UTC as 37th comment | 4 replies
On More things we found cut in half (CP+ 2015 edition) article (140 comments in total)

"Here's the buttock-clenchingly expensive Zeiss Otus 85mm f/1.4 Apo Planar T* ZE - a $4500 lens - brutally converted into a $2250 42.5mm. Shame."

Cutting the lens in half doesn't change the focal length. Otherwise an interesting article.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 15, 2015 at 08:21 UTC as 69th comment | 3 replies
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 Review preview (814 comments in total)
In reply to:

jack123torr: Hi all,

I am tempted to sell my Nikon D7100 + 18-200 lens (old vesion, "red NR") and replace by the FZ1000. It is smaller, lighter, more options (rotating screen, panorama, wifi, NFC, etc etc etc).

The only point that concerns me is: "will there be a noticeable difference on 4x6 prints at ISO 3200 and 6400"?

Any comments? Thanks.

If 4x6 inch and not foot prints are your target, there is no need for you to spend more than a couple hundred for a camera. You won't see a difference between a Fuji F900 and a $100,000 Hasselblad system.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 3, 2014 at 05:59 UTC
In reply to:

Peiasdf: Wow, for the price of these adapter, might as well pick up an extra Rebel SL1 when you want to shoot Canon lenses.

Lens bulk, what are you smoking?
The Canon 100-400 yields a 200-800 equivalent. Now what is the size weight comparison with the 800mm Canon canon, I forget?
This smart adapter is just the thing to get me to buy into the OMD system though it would be to enable the operation of a Canon 100mm macro.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 30, 2014 at 05:43 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 First Impressions Review preview (1267 comments in total)

After comparing the images to those from a Nikon D90/D300/D300S, IMHO it exceeds the IQ of those cameras if only slightly. These are amazing results for a $900 all in one camera, I doubt whether Panasonic is making any money on it. Just shows what 8 years of sensor technology advancement can do.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 29, 2014 at 04:21 UTC as 175th comment | 1 reply
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 First Impressions Review preview (1267 comments in total)
In reply to:

ISK: More FZ1000 samples here:

The RAW files are there for download, just click on the link. Unfortunately Lightroom doesn't yet support this camera.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 29, 2014 at 03:25 UTC
On Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 First Impressions Review preview (1267 comments in total)
In reply to:

Timmbits: I like more controls...
but I prefer the large LCD on the Sony, and I hate swing-out screens with a passion - no matter what you tell me about these two, I couldn't live with that LCD.
I guess we all have our preferences... but for me, it would be the Sony.

I too vote for a Fuji X-S2 with a larger sensor and a larger and faster RAW buffer. A battery grip would be a nice option and of course the latest in EVF technology. The ergonomics and size are terrific, a camera for adults instead of these little toy cameras for folks with the hands of an 8 year old.

Direct link | Posted on Jun 29, 2014 at 03:19 UTC
In reply to:

starwolfy: Before talking about isos people should learn what a correct exposure is. I shoot iso400 film hand held at night with no tripod on a 55 years old film camera. Look at my results on my gallery (just night examples of what I do, me who is just an amateur).

iso 400.000. Is it what you guys need ? Really ? Really ???

What a joke.

Go up into the Rocky Mountains to photograph wildflowers. Set up your RRS or Giottos tripod with your favorite camera and lens, compose and calculate exposure. Then notice that you'll need 1/4000 to 1/8000 sec to stop the fluttering flowers and leaves from the ever present wind. I forgot to mention that you are in the shade to get the deepest and richest colors and that some flowers only bloom in the shade such as the Lady Slipper Orchid or a Coloradian's favorite, the Columbine. The shadows are a good 8 EV darker than sunlight.

Of course multiple image HDR is impossible under 4,000 frames per second due to ghosting.

A beautifully clean ISO above 400K? I'd take out a second mortgage were it available. For now I'll keep saving my nickels for a D3S or D4S.

from a former D300S user

Direct link | Posted on Jun 22, 2014 at 18:28 UTC

8GB of RAM for serious image editing, NOT!

Direct link | Posted on May 20, 2014 at 23:08 UTC as 52nd comment | 5 replies
On Blood moon eclipse: Night of April 14-15 article (64 comments in total)
In reply to:

MLWestphal: What a shame it will be cloudy in NJ.........

Or didn't buy a Tesla. Wonder when the press is going to get wise to Teslagate. Christie is just another pawn of the oil companies aka Bushy and Ronnie.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 04:55 UTC
On Hands on with the Pentax 645Z article (663 comments in total)

Maybe the price of used 645D's will drop to a more affordable level. That and a 200mm macro would be just fine for me.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 15, 2014 at 04:33 UTC as 196th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

vadimraskin: What is the point in small camera that needs big lenses? Balancing it is a pain!

The point of a small camera is that they are basically jewelry as Leica discovered 40 years ago. Designing camera bodies for the hands of an 8 years old is an admission that few buyers are serious about photography. This is all about sales and not usability. They even lossy compress the raw images from the A7 bodies and nobody complains.

Direct link | Posted on Apr 8, 2014 at 03:58 UTC

While WayneHuangPhoto hit most of the top issues, there is still the almighty stupidity of the camera makers.

10's of thousands of Nikon D300/D300S owners did not replace their cameras because of the tiny raw buffer on the D7100.

Fuji is covering every silly mm and f/stop below 60mm with nothing meaningful above 60mm. Where is the 80-400/100-500 long lens, where is the 150mm macro...? If those lenses had existed, I would have purchased the X-Pro and then replaced it with the X-T1 even with the silly top shutter speed of 1/4000th sec. It's got an electronic shutter Fuji, give us high shutter speeds so we can actually use your f/1.2 lenses and eventually long telephotos.

Canon hasn't built a new camera in several years, just 60's Detroit styling changes and miniscule technical upgrades.

Sony,they can't do anything right.

Olympus, the only company getting almost everything right. They now have almost 50% of the interchangeable lens mirrorless market share. I wonder why?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 24, 2014 at 19:43 UTC as 115th comment | 2 replies

No different than what Jony Ive designs for Apple. Fashion is more important than function. Leica has been in the jewelry business for 40 years.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 4, 2014 at 05:28 UTC as 158th comment | 2 replies
On Adobe expands Photoshop and Lightroom offer article (628 comments in total)

By pumeco "Yes indeed, alternatives, paid or free - just alternatives"

What alternative is there to Lightroom? Nothing compares at any price. Though Aperture is almost there, Apple's approach to removing features from their photo and video apps with each new release makes that a silly option.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 21, 2013 at 21:24 UTC as 143rd comment | 5 replies
On Nikon Df preview (2792 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpix345: I heard they will soon offer a limited edition version with no LCD for only $1000 more.

And they are going to hire Hasselblad to make an $8000 wooden grip so that it can be held comfortably by an adult.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 5, 2013 at 05:40 UTC
On Nikon Df preview (2792 comments in total)
In reply to:

nathantw: WTF, no XQD card? And SD instead of CF? What the heck?

You got it. SD = toy camera. At least the other FX cameras have 2 slots so that one can be used as a backup. Clearly the shutter is from the D610 as well. Getting D4 IQ for $2000 less would be a deal if not for the toy memory card and the top shutter speed of 1/4000. As all but one of my lenses are FX, this would have been a no brainer move from my D300S.

Direct link | Posted on Nov 5, 2013 at 05:33 UTC
On PPE 2013: Hands-on with new Manfrotto 190 tripods article (18 comments in total)

For a Nikon D300S and Sigma 180 macro, I found this rig to be insufficiently sturdy and went with the Manfrotto 055XB. Heavy yes but I stop so often to take pictures that it is not really noticeable.

I use the Manfrotto 3275 Gear head (replaced by 410jr). Tripod and head weigh 126 oz (7 lbs 14 oz) or 3.6 kg.

While the light Manfrotto ball heads lack stiffness and security, I found the 498 to be both sturdy and secure. There is a safety catch on the release lever so that it takes 2 hands to remove the camera. Though, this is a heavy head, it compares favorably against heads costing twice as much.

Sometime in the next few months, I hope to have the opportunity to do some wildlife photography with a Sigma 50-500 on my D300S. I will bring both the gear and ball head for some parallel testing. My GUESS is that I'll be sticking with the gear head for landscape work and the ball head for wildlife. Yes a gimbal head would be nice but any under about $600 seem to not work that well.

Direct link | Posted on Oct 24, 2013 at 23:38 UTC as 6th comment
On First Impressions: Using the Nikon D4 article (183 comments in total)

See Thom Hogan's review at:

Direct link | Posted on Oct 22, 2013 at 06:32 UTC as 14th comment
On Can computer corrections make simple lenses look good? article (163 comments in total)
In reply to:

Henry Falkner: They are re-inventing the wheel. Such corrections are incorporated in the firmware of my 24x zoom Olympus SZ-30MR pocket P&S and a multitude of similar dedicated cameras, and presumably in all cell phone cameras.

Academe is sometimes so isolated, they have no clue as what is happening around them.

Too bad you had to demonstrate to the world that you didn't understand the article. This is known as trolling.

Direct link | Posted on Sep 30, 2013 at 21:10 UTC
Total: 26, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »