Wye Photography

Wye Photography

Lives in United Kingdom Chepstow, United Kingdom
Works as a Photographer Designer
Has a website at www.wyephotography.com
Joined on Feb 16, 2009

Comments

Total: 376, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »
On Cold War camera: 1950s Berlin in color (part 2) article (41 comments in total)

Wonderful pictures!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 10, 2014 at 14:36 UTC as 5th comment
On Cold War camera: 1950s Berlin in color (part 2) article (41 comments in total)

Love the photos.

I came across this site recently, the tone of the pictures is very similar and worth a look (they are NOT mine).

http://www.pbase.com/beppuu/halframe

Direct link | Posted on Sep 7, 2014 at 21:06 UTC as 16th comment
On Cold War camera: 1950s Berlin in color (part 1) article (119 comments in total)

Nice photos. I enjoyed browsing and more to come - Fab!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 1, 2014 at 14:09 UTC as 32nd comment
In reply to:

Danny: Mac version please.

I like you!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2014 at 16:32 UTC
In reply to:

The Photo Ninja: Too bad not for Mac.

I run windows on my Mac using Virtualbox (mainly for Active Directory work). Works a treat! You can delete it in seconds and "snapshots" really work.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2014 at 07:52 UTC
In reply to:

Danny: Mac version please.

Have you tried Pixelmator?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2014 at 07:45 UTC
On Hands-on with the Pentax K-S1 article (326 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wye Photography: Is it available in Fluorescent Pink?

BarnET,

I concur, not only should the designers all be fired, I would recommend Seppuku.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2014 at 07:40 UTC
On Hands-on with the Pentax K-S1 article (326 comments in total)

I think Ricoh Pentax need to sack their designers!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2014 at 11:33 UTC as 65th comment | 1 reply
On Hands-on with the Pentax K-S1 article (326 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wye Photography: Is it available in Fluorescent Pink?

Purple! That's dark Pink isn't it? Just one of the most depressing of colours.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2014 at 11:29 UTC
On Hands-on with the Pentax K-S1 article (326 comments in total)

Is it available in Fluorescent Pink?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2014 at 07:37 UTC as 82nd comment | 5 replies
On Opinion: Do we really need the Fuji X30? article (305 comments in total)
In reply to:

Aroart: My fuji x20 got me laid more than my sony rx100 or canon 70 d...nuff said...

@ Mirfak,

LOL.

What came first, the chicken or the Aroart?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2014 at 07:35 UTC
On Opinion: Do we really need the Fuji X30? article (305 comments in total)
In reply to:

Aroart: My fuji x20 got me laid more than my sony rx100 or canon 70 d...nuff said...

Laid by what tho?

If the X20 got you laid, does this mean that without the X20 you don't get laid?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 27, 2014 at 11:04 UTC

If an animal makes an exposure using a photographer's gear they (the animal) should be classed as "photographer by proxy" i.e. they make the exposure on the behalf of the photographer.

I think that would solve all future issues.

IF the current judgement stands and is adopted by others countries then in future similar cases where an animal makes an exposure or triggers an exposure the photographer will simply lie and say "I made the exposure" and that will end the matter.

(tongue-in-cheek) I suspect that in this case the photographer actually did make the exposure but said the monkey did it for the publicity.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 26, 2014 at 07:23 UTC as 13th comment
In reply to:

stawarz: So will this set a precedent whereby if an animal takes a picture of itself the photographer who's equipment took the image no longer assumes copyright? Now what happens to all the other wildlife pictures whereby they were triggered by the animal tripping a remote release and not by the photographer, have they in fact taken a selfie?

Only in some US states, the rest of the world may have a different view.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 26, 2014 at 07:08 UTC
In reply to:

sixtiesphotographer: That is one handsome monkey with a great smile.

If I looked like that, I'd've been married by now.

:-(

Direct link | Posted on Aug 23, 2014 at 06:43 UTC
In reply to:

Marty4650: Now that the matter is settled, shouldn't we be paying bananas to that monkey for royalties?

Marty4650

You obviously missed this paragraph from the your own link which throws doubt on the judgement...

"In the internet age, publication online may be considered publication in every sufficiently internet-connected jurisdiction in the world. It is not clear what this may mean for determining "country of origin". In Kernel v. Mosley, a U.S. court "concluded that a work created outside of the United States, uploaded in Australia and owned by a company registered in Finland was nonetheless a U.S. work by virtue of its being published online". However other U.S. courts in similar situations have reached different conclusions, e.g. Håkan Moberg v. 33T LLC.[4] The matter of determining the country of origin for digital publication remains a topic of controversy among law academics as well"

The convention goes on to mention the country origin (which ISNT the bl00dy US), so US law (as quoted at the outset of the article just shouldn't apply. I agree with Stu above. Not settled yet!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2014 at 17:47 UTC
In reply to:

Langusta: “What do you call 500 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?”

Whale 5h!t

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2014 at 17:38 UTC
In reply to:

straylightrun: Breaking news just in: It has now been confirmed that If your photo is captured using the camera's self timer, it is legally not your photo any more but is the property of your camera.

ONLY in the US. The rest of the world is NOT subject to US law. Judges in the other 192 countries may judge differently - what then!

Should the US dictate to the rest of the world? No wonder people are P!55ed at them!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2014 at 09:49 UTC
In reply to:

Marty4650: Now that the matter is settled, shouldn't we be paying bananas to that monkey for royalties?

The matter may be settled in the US (for now). As the world doesn't do obeisance to, and isn't under US law, I wonder what a copyright ruling would be in the UK.

I don't see why a ruling in the US has worldwide effect. The company in question may be US based, the ruling should apply only to the US. If a judge in one of the other 192 countries of the world deems the copyright to be the holder of the photographer - What then!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2014 at 09:46 UTC
On Nikon D810: A sport photographer's impressions article (245 comments in total)
In reply to:

ysengrain: Do you think useful to get those snaps by using a very-nec plus ultra-the most high tech possible to show this kind of photos ?

Pardon!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 13, 2014 at 07:38 UTC
Total: 376, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »