Wye Photography

Wye Photography

Lives in Australia Australia
Joined on Feb 16, 2009

Comments

Total: 492, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On A closer look at the Nikon Coolpix P900 megazoom article (191 comments in total)
In reply to:

KonstantinosK: I found myself spending more time reading about this than the D7200. Hmmm...

Strangely, so have I.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 3, 2015 at 08:38 UTC
On A closer look at the Nikon Coolpix P900 megazoom article (191 comments in total)
In reply to:

maxnimo: If this camera can produce images as good as the Nikon D750, I will be impressed. Keeping my fingers crossed.

...and me!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 3, 2015 at 08:37 UTC
On A closer look at the Nikon Coolpix P900 megazoom article (191 comments in total)
In reply to:

chillgreg: It's f*cking MASSIVE!!!

lol

Direct link | Posted on Mar 3, 2015 at 08:36 UTC
On A closer look at the Nikon Coolpix P900 megazoom article (191 comments in total)
In reply to:

grasscatcher: You'll need to get your long-distance shots early in the morning, before the heat waves set in, and atmospheric haze sets in. Afternoon longshots will be limited to cool, cloudy days. Moonshots will be limited to clear, cold nights with the moon directly overhead.

On the other hand, it might be just the tool for photographing a small critter/bug in your neighbor's yard in the afternoon, if it doesn't move too fast.

No hotshoe means the Olympus RDS won't fit on it, so no action shots.

I just maybe at an advantage then in the UK.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 2, 2015 at 14:51 UTC
On A closer look at the Nikon Coolpix P900 megazoom article (191 comments in total)

It will be very interesting looking at sample pix from all over the zoom range especially at the long end. Will I laugh or cry or both!

An ideal camera for pedos, it's bound to sell well!

Direct link | Posted on Mar 2, 2015 at 10:10 UTC as 76th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

munro harrap: There is also another good reason for keeping all the art we have here here. Its called war. You can see online what IS and the Taliban do, so their people's culture would be safer were it in the UK, all of ity, rather than in Iraq, Syria or Afghanistan, and we now also have to control who is allowed to buy stuff as any number of artworks purchased privately not only disappear into bank vaults,

but can be bought by people who then destroy them as ideologically unacceptable.
I dare say that is already happening, so stop sales and guard our human heritage.

@JDThomas,

Sorry mate, you mis-understood. I wasn't even thinking about or referring to Texan/Mexican history at all but the amount of Mexicans flooding over your border. I mean you talk about the lack of British border control (and that is certainly true) when you have major issues there yourself. It is reckoned that within 20 years Spanish will be the most spoken language in the USA.

I'm a bigot it seems, an anti-american one then. At least I can understand why people want to fly aircraft into your buildings, cut your heads off and blow you up, wrong as it all is.

The way black americans are still treated by some white americans and the police is nothing but disgraceful.

"One nation under god"! (or "una nación bajo Dios" as it will soon be) More like "One nation under Satan" is a more apt description.

Like the British empire fell, the american one is about to go.

Direct link | Posted on Mar 1, 2015 at 15:53 UTC
In reply to:

munro harrap: There is also another good reason for keeping all the art we have here here. Its called war. You can see online what IS and the Taliban do, so their people's culture would be safer were it in the UK, all of ity, rather than in Iraq, Syria or Afghanistan, and we now also have to control who is allowed to buy stuff as any number of artworks purchased privately not only disappear into bank vaults,

but can be bought by people who then destroy them as ideologically unacceptable.
I dare say that is already happening, so stop sales and guard our human heritage.

@JDThomas - one word mate - Mexicans!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 28, 2015 at 21:57 UTC
In reply to:

AbrasiveReducer: I hadn't heard of Rejlander since I was a photo student. Nice to see the old boy getting some attention. This and Meyer Goerlitz lenses in the same week; wow.

I have a Meyer Goerlitz lens! Er, never actually used it - yet!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 28, 2015 at 21:54 UTC
In reply to:

Elmos: Wow.. so much hostility against the UK. What is being proposed doesn't seem unreasonable to me. Nothing is being destroyed or hidden or faked. The images were made in the UK by someone living in the UK and are now considered culturally valuable what is the issue here ? do we have too much time on our hands folks ?

@DaveE1,
But it's fun! and I like pulling the todger of those who should know better. You won't deprive me of some secret puerile sniggering would you? Would you?

@Tom Goodman
Don't you mean pseudo-intelligensia elitist axe grinding Trolls?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 27, 2015 at 20:50 UTC
In reply to:

Papi61: So, this is a British national pride issue. To hell with the FACT that the photographer was actually Swedish... Priceless.

But then again, these are the same people who used to claim that Egyptian obelisks and artifacts retrieved from archeological sites were rightfully theirs... (and even though they might have changed mind on that, I don't think they're going to return anything any soon...)

Just to be clear, I'm against all forms of stupid nationalism. Yeah, I'm perfectly aware that the latter is tautology... :)

Human art belongs to all humans, regardless of nationality.

@Papis61,

In answer to your stupid comment: NO!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 27, 2015 at 20:38 UTC
In reply to:

bluevellet: Just don't send the album to Mosul Iraq

Seeing ISIS going through that museum smashing 3000 year old artifacts with sledgehammers... Just awful.

Keep calm, don't lose your heads!

The good ol' USAF will go in and smart bomb ISIS, women and children to Hellfire!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 27, 2015 at 20:36 UTC
In reply to:

JDThomas: Is England going to require the return of all foreign works of fine art to their country of origin? What is the British Museum doing with Egyptian mummies and Greek statues?

Surely they should be returned to their rightful place in the world?

JDThomas,

You actually trust the Egyptians, Greeks and others to adequately care for their priceless works of antiquity taking into account the political and/or financial instability of their home countries?

Direct link | Posted on Feb 27, 2015 at 09:45 UTC
In reply to:

Papi61: So, this is a British national pride issue. To hell with the FACT that the photographer was actually Swedish... Priceless.

But then again, these are the same people who used to claim that Egyptian obelisks and artifacts retrieved from archeological sites were rightfully theirs... (and even though they might have changed mind on that, I don't think they're going to return anything any soon...)

Just to be clear, I'm against all forms of stupid nationalism. Yeah, I'm perfectly aware that the latter is tautology... :)

Human art belongs to all humans, regardless of nationality.

Born in Sweden, lived most in his life in Britain, married a British woman, had Royal patronage, did the majority of his work in Britain. I think this actually qualifies that his body of work stays in Britain.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 27, 2015 at 09:42 UTC
In reply to:

steelhead3: the British have so little in the way of great Art through the ages, they thought it necessary to rob foreign lands of their treasures by military force.

At least we have HISTORY! and lots of it, unlike some!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 27, 2015 at 09:29 UTC
In reply to:

Steve in GA: Goodness. I don't think I have seen this many anti-Brit comments since, oh, 1776 or so.

Yeah, DPReview readers are so racist!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 27, 2015 at 08:21 UTC
In reply to:

Reinhard136: excellent news, valuing culture like that. the British of course will not want to be accused of being hypocritical, so they will be packing the Elgin Marbles in cases for return right now ......

Whilst we are at it, I think the former colonies should return to the crown as well.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 27, 2015 at 08:19 UTC
On Adobe celebrates 25 years of Photoshop article (366 comments in total)
In reply to:

Marty4650: People who enjoy paying $10 a month for the rest of their lives to get the latest tools are right. This is the "best deal for them" even if it is a very poor deal for others. But there are plenty of other people who don't want or need to upgrade every year. And their attitude seems to be... "that's their problem.... I got what I want."

I wonder if these those people lease their cars rather than buy them? I wonder if they upgrade to every release of Microsoft Office? Do they rent their homes? Or rent their furniture? Do they upgrade their wives every year?

I think the whole point of the complaints is that Adobe stopped giving you a choice of renting or buying. Everyone has to rent now, or use some other software. Take it or leave it.

This may be great for the people who were upgrading every year anyway, and for Adobe's bottom line, but it shouldn't be hard to understand why other people would rather own their homes, cars, furniture or software rather then renting.

I am with you there Marty4650,

Adobe are playing the long term view, that you'll rent over a long period of time and end up paying more during that time.

Photoshop really ceased being useful to me after CS2. My current version CS 5.5 I am only using because of the Education site license my School has. I will use 5.5 for a long time to come and look to an alternative such as Affinity Photo or Pixelmator. IF LR goes CC full time then I will continue using my current version. It's better than my photography.

PC users have a better choice when it comes to alternatives such as from Serif or Corel.

CC is all about the business model and making money. Adobe is not a charity. They design software to make money from you.

No product can be developed forever, there will come a time when Photoshop can be developed no further. I bet you Adobe are crapping themselves over that "day".

If I had the choice CC or nothing. Then I will choose nothing, lose interest and move on to something else.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 19, 2015 at 16:47 UTC
In reply to:

srados: Company that excludes pc users is the same like what Canon that chose not to release their Eos-m3 to north America.

@ srados,

Affinity Photo is a new piece of software built from the ground-up specially for the Mac.

The PC "version" (and I use that word in the loosest sense possible) is Photo Plus X7, a very capable and very inexpensive piece of PC software. I suppose that is praise indeed coming from a dedicated Mac user.

Have a go at the free trial version and see what you think. What do you have to lose!

Direct link | Posted on Feb 19, 2015 at 16:30 UTC
On Adobe celebrates 25 years of Photoshop article (366 comments in total)
In reply to:

lucinio: Cloud license at 9,99$ is less expensive than previous way (if u want to have your software up to date). I'm very happy with the new selling politic and really I don't understand all those critics. But ok: maybe they prefer to spend more and finally the world is beautiful because it is varied :-)

Lets say Adobe had a subscription of $10 per month since inception, that means you would have spent $3000 on it to date. Hmmm, that sounds like an expensive piece of software to me!

$10 per month isn't expensive but that is a very short term view and one that Adobe is banking on you to make. The whole point of CC is the long term view and Adobe are banking on it.

Direct link | Posted on Feb 19, 2015 at 11:50 UTC
In reply to:

Wye Photography: Apparently PS CC costs $9 per month. $9 a month may sound cheap but that is $108 per annum, $324 over three years, $540 over 5 years.

Affinity photo will cost you $50 to begin with, the $50 you have already paid after one year. The $50 you have already paid after three years and the $50 you have already paid after five years. $50 vs $540.

This software is BETA

It can only get BETTER.

If you want to pour money into Adobe's coffers...

The choice is yours.

@ Arvin Chang

You are right. Over the last few years I don't like the direction that Adobe is going or what they are doing.

Apart from Lightroom I don't like Adobe products anymore. The term "flogging a dead horse" comes to mind. Photoshop CS2 was the last version that was any good for me, since then the "upgrades" have been rather pointless.

I only use Photoshop CS5.5 because I benefit from an educational site licence.

So you are right, there is a good deal of dissatisfaction with Adobe.

I have not used Affinity Photo enough to give it a good honest appraisal, I will though because there are a lot of benefits. I am quite excited that, at long last, I may be able to rid myself of expensive Adobe products. The term "expensive" is relative. I don't like CC. People often view it in the very short term, that is what Adobe banking on and not how much you'll spend on it after 5, 10 or 15 years of use.

Hand waving - Sorry, I don't understand that metaphor. Please elaborate

Direct link | Posted on Feb 14, 2015 at 16:40 UTC
Total: 492, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »