Wye Photography

Wye Photography

Lives in United Kingdom Chepstow, United Kingdom
Works as a Photographer Designer
Has a website at www.wyephotography.com
Joined on Feb 16, 2009

Comments

Total: 319, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On Fujifilm X100T Overview preview (399 comments in total)
In reply to:

picsnmorepics: Whoaa, this sounds interesting. I just about came out of my skin waiting and waiting for a X100. It must have been about 4 months coming and just before a big trip to Europe. After about 2000 shots I had to finish several days of the trip at f/2. Fortunately there was enough control to do that and the lens at f/2 was good enough to give me decent results. That SAB problem was eventually fixed, the firmware updates happened and every time I pick up my F100, I thank Fuji for hanging in there but I'll always wonder what they as a company expect of me as a customer next.

This looks like a very nice upgrade to my X100. I also use a Ricoh GR Digital, and a couple of Nikon DSLRs plus a Nikon 1 V2. All pass through my LR/PSCC with wonderful results. All I hear is grief about the X-Trans and Adobe. Lots of workarounds with other software, but when I'm already well established into a RAW workflow with three other sensor technologies, why would I wish the X-trans on myself on purpose.

@ tedolf

The camera never lies????????

Direct link | Posted on Sep 12, 2014 at 17:03 UTC
On Fujifilm X100T Overview preview (399 comments in total)
In reply to:

picsnmorepics: Whoaa, this sounds interesting. I just about came out of my skin waiting and waiting for a X100. It must have been about 4 months coming and just before a big trip to Europe. After about 2000 shots I had to finish several days of the trip at f/2. Fortunately there was enough control to do that and the lens at f/2 was good enough to give me decent results. That SAB problem was eventually fixed, the firmware updates happened and every time I pick up my F100, I thank Fuji for hanging in there but I'll always wonder what they as a company expect of me as a customer next.

This looks like a very nice upgrade to my X100. I also use a Ricoh GR Digital, and a couple of Nikon DSLRs plus a Nikon 1 V2. All pass through my LR/PSCC with wonderful results. All I hear is grief about the X-Trans and Adobe. Lots of workarounds with other software, but when I'm already well established into a RAW workflow with three other sensor technologies, why would I wish the X-trans on myself on purpose.

@photo perzon

You badly need PortraitPro

http://www.portraitprofessional.com

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2014 at 09:02 UTC
On Fujifilm X100T Overview preview (399 comments in total)
In reply to:

Boss of Sony: Am dis a contraption wot produces two-dimensional images of three-dimensional space? In dat case, it am truly a wonderful invention. Quite worthy of spending your hard-earned dollars and precious time.

Sorry!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 11, 2014 at 08:58 UTC
On Cold War camera: 1950s Berlin in color (part 2) article (38 comments in total)

Wonderful pictures!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 10, 2014 at 14:36 UTC as 4th comment
On Cold War camera: 1950s Berlin in color (part 2) article (38 comments in total)

Love the photos.

I came across this site recently, the tone of the pictures is very similar and worth a look (they are NOT mine).

http://www.pbase.com/beppuu/halframe

Direct link | Posted on Sep 7, 2014 at 21:06 UTC as 15th comment
On Cold War camera: 1950s Berlin in color (part 1) article (117 comments in total)

Nice photos. I enjoyed browsing and more to come - Fab!

Direct link | Posted on Sep 1, 2014 at 14:09 UTC as 30th comment
In reply to:

Danny: Mac version please.

I like you!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2014 at 16:32 UTC
In reply to:

The Photo Ninja: Too bad not for Mac.

I run windows on my Mac using Virtualbox (mainly for Active Directory work). Works a treat! You can delete it in seconds and "snapshots" really work.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2014 at 07:52 UTC
In reply to:

Danny: Mac version please.

Have you tried Pixelmator?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2014 at 07:45 UTC
On Hands-on with the Pentax K-S1 article (312 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wye Photography: Is it available in Fluorescent Pink?

BarnET,

I concur, not only should the designers all be fired, I would recommend Seppuku.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 29, 2014 at 07:40 UTC
On Hands-on with the Pentax K-S1 article (312 comments in total)

I think Ricoh Pentax need to sack their designers!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2014 at 11:33 UTC as 59th comment | 1 reply
On Hands-on with the Pentax K-S1 article (312 comments in total)
In reply to:

Wye Photography: Is it available in Fluorescent Pink?

Purple! That's dark Pink isn't it? Just one of the most depressing of colours.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2014 at 11:29 UTC
On Hands-on with the Pentax K-S1 article (312 comments in total)

Is it available in Fluorescent Pink?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2014 at 07:37 UTC as 76th comment | 5 replies
On Opinion: Do we really need the Fuji X30? article (303 comments in total)
In reply to:

Aroart: My fuji x20 got me laid more than my sony rx100 or canon 70 d...nuff said...

@ Mirfak,

LOL.

What came first, the chicken or the Aroart?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 28, 2014 at 07:35 UTC
On Opinion: Do we really need the Fuji X30? article (303 comments in total)
In reply to:

Aroart: My fuji x20 got me laid more than my sony rx100 or canon 70 d...nuff said...

Laid by what tho?

If the X20 got you laid, does this mean that without the X20 you don't get laid?

Direct link | Posted on Aug 27, 2014 at 11:04 UTC

If an animal makes an exposure using a photographer's gear they (the animal) should be classed as "photographer by proxy" i.e. they make the exposure on the behalf of the photographer.

I think that would solve all future issues.

IF the current judgement stands and is adopted by others countries then in future similar cases where an animal makes an exposure or triggers an exposure the photographer will simply lie and say "I made the exposure" and that will end the matter.

(tongue-in-cheek) I suspect that in this case the photographer actually did make the exposure but said the monkey did it for the publicity.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 26, 2014 at 07:23 UTC as 13th comment
In reply to:

stawarz: So will this set a precedent whereby if an animal takes a picture of itself the photographer who's equipment took the image no longer assumes copyright? Now what happens to all the other wildlife pictures whereby they were triggered by the animal tripping a remote release and not by the photographer, have they in fact taken a selfie?

Only in some US states, the rest of the world may have a different view.

Direct link | Posted on Aug 26, 2014 at 07:08 UTC
In reply to:

sixtiesphotographer: That is one handsome monkey with a great smile.

If I looked like that, I'd've been married by now.

:-(

Direct link | Posted on Aug 23, 2014 at 06:43 UTC
In reply to:

Marty4650: Now that the matter is settled, shouldn't we be paying bananas to that monkey for royalties?

Marty4650

You obviously missed this paragraph from the your own link which throws doubt on the judgement...

"In the internet age, publication online may be considered publication in every sufficiently internet-connected jurisdiction in the world. It is not clear what this may mean for determining "country of origin". In Kernel v. Mosley, a U.S. court "concluded that a work created outside of the United States, uploaded in Australia and owned by a company registered in Finland was nonetheless a U.S. work by virtue of its being published online". However other U.S. courts in similar situations have reached different conclusions, e.g. Håkan Moberg v. 33T LLC.[4] The matter of determining the country of origin for digital publication remains a topic of controversy among law academics as well"

The convention goes on to mention the country origin (which ISNT the bl00dy US), so US law (as quoted at the outset of the article just shouldn't apply. I agree with Stu above. Not settled yet!

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2014 at 17:47 UTC
In reply to:

Langusta: “What do you call 500 lawyers at the bottom of the ocean?”

Whale 5h!t

Direct link | Posted on Aug 22, 2014 at 17:38 UTC
Total: 319, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »